Court Rules
Common questions about Kings Superior Court rules

Are courtesy copies required in Kings Superior Court?

For an ex parte application or opposition to be heard within two court days of filing, the moving and opposing parties must lodge an additional complete and unaltered copy of every filed document and exhibit, subject to stated exceptions.

View ruleSource: page 43, section RULE 309 – Legal Research Copy

Does Kings Superior Court require a pre-motion conference or letter before filing a motion?

Kings Superior Court rules set a pre-motion procedure for motion in limines. Before lodging a motion in limine, the parties in every civil case must meet and confer.

View ruleSource: page 44, section RULE 311 – Motions in Limine

What page or word limits apply to motion in limine argument in Kings Superior Court?

Kings Superior Court's rule states these limits: 3 pages; 3 pages. Excludes exhibits, table of contents, and table of authorities. For each opposed motion in limine, the submitted binder document may contain at most three pages of argument for and three pages of argument against, subject to an aggregate six-page-per-motion limit that excludes exhibits, tables of contents, and tables of authorities.

View ruleSource: page 44, section RULE 311 – Motions in Limine

What page or word limits apply to memorandum of points and authorities in Kings Superior Court?

Kings Superior Court's rule states these limits: 10 pages. A memorandum of points and authorities submitted in support of or opposition to a motion, petition, warrant application, or other request may not exceed 10 pages; for affidavits, attached exhibits count toward the limit, and exceeding 10 pages requires prior court permission.

View ruleSource: page 68, section RULE 526 – Felony Pre-Trial Motions

What formatting rules apply to filings in Kings Superior Court?

Kings Superior Court's formatting rule includes must permit word searches of the text. Electronically filed documents must contain searchable text.

View ruleSource: page 25

What must be included with competency evaluation report filings in Kings Superior Court?

The rule identifies required filing content or certificates. The expert must submit a written competency evaluation report to the court, minor’s counsel, the probation department, and the prosecution.

View ruleSource: page 5, section VI. Expert Report

What must be included with written report filings in Kings Superior Court?

The rule identifies required filing content or certificates. A court-appointed expert's competency report must be submitted to the court, child's counsel, probation department, and prosecution.

View ruleSource: page 18, section (g) Written report

How does Kings Superior Court handle sealed or redacted filings?

A motion to seal is required for covered sealed filings in Kings Superior Court. Sealed documents must be filed and lodged conventionally rather than electronically.

View ruleSource: page 24, section General and Administrative Rules

How do I request an adjournment or extension in Kings Superior Court?

Advance notice is not fully stated in the structured details. The request must include reason for request. After report disclosure, the court must grant a reasonable continuance when the opposing party requests additional preparation time and demonstrates good cause.

View ruleSource: page 12, section Appendix 1: California Welfare and Institutions Code § 709

Does Kings Superior Court require motion papers to be bundled?

Yes. Kings Superior Court requires bundling for covered papers. All evidence supporting or opposing an opposed motion in limine must be compiled into one binder.

View ruleSource: page 44, section RULE 311 – Motions in Limine

Is electronic filing required in Kings Superior Court?

No. Electronic filing is prohibited for the covered filings. The court prohibits direct fax filing of documents.

View ruleSource: page 15, section RULE 112 – Facsimile Machine (Fax) Filing

Are filing fees or waivers addressed in Kings Superior Court?

A fee is required for covered filings. Users must pay all required filing fees for electronically filed documents to the Vendor, which must remit the fees to the clerk.

View ruleSource: page 26, section H. PAYMENT OF STATUTORY FILING FEES

When is a filing treated as filed in Kings Superior Court?

The rule addresses filing timing, filing status, or cure windows. Parties must disclose competency experts at least five court days before the hearing.

View ruleSource: page 4, section V. Appointment of Expert Psychologist/Psychiatrist

What service or proof of service rules apply in Kings Superior Court?

The rule addresses service method, recipient, or timing requirements. Details: timing: 5 court days before hearing. An expert's report and qualifications must be disclosed to the opposing party within a reasonable time and no later than five court days before the competency hearing.

View ruleSource: page 12, section Appendix 1: California Welfare and Institutions Code § 709
Complete rules summary for Kings Superior Court

Parties must disclose competency experts at least five court days before the hearing.

The expert must submit a written competency evaluation report to the court, minor’s counsel, the probation department, and the prosecution.

The written report must state whether the minor understands the proceedings and has a rational and factual basis for understanding, together with the basis for those conclusions.

When the expert finds the minor incompetent, the report must address the likelihood of attaining competence in the foreseeable future and recommend effective remediation services if attainment is likely.

The order appointing the expert should identify whether the minor or parents need an interpreter and, if so, specify the language.

The competency evaluation must be submitted to the court at least two court days before the competency hearing.

An expert's report and qualifications must be disclosed to the opposing party within a reasonable time and no later than five court days before the competency hearing.

After report disclosure, the court must grant a reasonable continuance when the opposing party requests additional preparation time and demonstrates good cause.

A court-appointed expert's competency report must be submitted to the court, child's counsel, probation department, and prosecution.

The written competency report must contain the listed information, including referral and competency definition, expert qualifications, evaluation procedures, developmental history, evaluation results, competency analysis, treatment opinion, and placement or service recommendations.

The juvenile competency evaluation report should include the minor’s identifying information and other relevant background details.

The evaluator should interview the minor.

The evaluator should review all available relevant records concerning the minor.

The evaluator should consult with the minor’s counsel.

The evaluator should consult with the minor’s probation officer.

The evaluator should consult with other persons who provided information to the court about the minor’s competence.

The evaluation should gather the minor’s developmental history.

Age-appropriate competence testing should be administered unless the case facts make it inappropriate or unnecessary.

The evaluator should assess the minor’s cooperation and, if it is inadequate or significantly uncertain, consider halting the evaluation and informing the parties.

Where possible, the report should answer the listed competence questions yes or no and provide the rationale for the opinion.

The evaluator must report the efforts made to obtain information that is unavailable.

The report should include a concise summary of the competency findings.

When the minor is found not competent, the report should include additional remediation information.

For a minor found not competent, the report should address whether remediation services could lead to competence in the foreseeable future and explain the basis for that opinion.

For a minor found not competent, the report should identify effective remediation services based on the minor’s current functioning.

For a minor found not competent, the report should identify which aspects of functioning can realistically be remediated.

For a minor found not competent, the report should provide a specific, detailed remediation plan covering available resources, strategies, interventions, timelines, and the estimated likelihood of success.

A trial date may be vacated or continued only for good cause through a duly noticed motion complying with California Rules of Court 3.1332 and 3.1335.

An FL-150 Income and Expense Declaration must be filed and served with moving and responsive papers in matters involving child support, spousal support, attorney fees, or payment obligations, except for individuals in contempt proceedings for nonpayment of support.

Unless notice is waived or the court orders otherwise, the prevailing party must prepare, serve, and file the proposed order as required by California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312.

More Judges in Kings Superior Court

Jennifer Giuliani
Judge
Jim A. Trevino
Judge
Kathy Ciuffini
Judge
Kendra D. Weber
Judge
Marianne Gilbert
Judge
Mark Skinner
Judge
Melissa D'Morias
Judge
Risé Donlon
Judge