Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Regulatory ReportLow Risk

Connecticut AG Urges PURA to Reject Eversource Storm Cost Interest Payments

EversourceApril 29, 2026Connecticut Attorney General

Summary

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong filed a brief on April 29, 2026, urging the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) to reject Eversource’s request for $340 million in interest payments on nearly $1 billion in unvetted storm costs from 2018 to 2023. This press release does not describe a privacy-related enforcement action, as no data privacy violations are alleged, and no final enforcement action has been taken against Eversource. The matter involves utility cost recovery and regulatory advocacy, not privacy compliance.

Contract Impact

This matter does not involve privacy violations, so no privacy-related contract clauses require review. In-house legal teams in the energy and utility sectors may wish to review cost recovery, regulatory filing, and delay-related clauses in agreements with regulators or contractors, but this is outside the scope of privacy enforcement contract review.

Contract Search Terms

storm cost recoveryinterest payment clauseregulatory approvalcost prudence reviewdiscovery extension

Laws Cited

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-234
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-234

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Eversource

Industry

Other

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Eversource"
Laws Cited
"Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-234"
Event Date
"04/29/2026"
Document Urls
"https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/ag/press_releases/2026/25-12-13-storm-costs-prudency-brief.pdf?rev=62bba5f7d68f42108665629adfeea744&hash=276E65EFAD99C2AC0C3B717DBC8B2F4D"

Related Enforcement Actions

CT

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined a multistate coalition suing the EPA over its repeal of greenhouse gas pollution limits for power plants and separately filed a notice of intent to sue over regulation of existing gas plants. The coalition asks the court to overturn the repeal and restore the protections; the release reports no monetary penalty or final order.

CT

Sandoz Inc. and Fougera Pharmaceuticals Inc.

$400.0M

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced a $400 million settlement with Sandoz Inc. and Fougera Pharmaceuticals Inc. resolving allegations that the generic drug manufacturers conspired to inflate prices, limit competition, and restrain trade. The settlement includes consumer restitution and injunctive reforms; court approval was being sought.

CT

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined a coalition of 21 attorneys general in submitting a comment letter opposing a DHS rule that allows certain affirmative asylum applications to be referred to removal proceedings without an asylum officer interview. The coalition argues the rule violates federal law and harms asylum seekers, including unaccompanied children; this was a policy opposition letter, not a privacy enforcement action.

CT

NextEra Energy and Dominion Energy

Connecticut and Massachusetts co-led a coalition protest urging FERC to reject the proposed NextEra Energy-Dominion Energy merger. The coalition argued that the merger could increase market power and threaten energy affordability, reliability, and competition; the release does not report a final enforcement decision or penalty.

CT

Unspecified home improvement contractors

Connecticut officials warned residents about potential home improvement scams before an approaching nor’easter, including unlicensed contractors, high-pressure sales tactics, and demands for full payment upfront. The release provides consumer guidance on checking contractors and contract requirements; it does not announce an enforcement action or penalty against a named entity.

CT

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined a coalition of 22 attorneys general and Pennsylvania’s governor in a letter urging HHS to keep federal vaccine recommendations grounded in scientific and medical evidence. The letter asks HHS to preserve the ACIP’s role and current vaccine recommendation categories; it is a policy advocacy action, not a privacy enforcement action.