Court Rules
All enforcement actions
CoalitionLow RiskMultistate

Minnesota AG and coalition sue Trump administration over unlawful TANF data sharing

Administration for Children and Families (ACF)August 3, 2026Minnesota Attorney General

Summary

Attorney General Ellison joined a coalition of 23 other states and DC to sue the Trump administration over a policy that would allow the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) to share sensitive TANF recipient data with other federal agencies. The lawsuit argues the policy violates the Administrative Procedure Act and the Spending Clause, and seeks to block its implementation.

Remedy

The lawsuit seeks a court order declaring ACF's policy illegal and preventing it from being implemented.

Injunction

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review any contracts with government agencies or that involve handling of sensitive personal data, particularly data related to social services like TANF. They should ensure that data sharing clauses are strictly limited to authorized purposes and that any disclosure to third parties or other government entities requires explicit consent or legal authority. Additionally, contracts should include robust confidentiality and data security provisions, and should specify that data cannot be used for immigration enforcement or other unrelated purposes. Reviewing data processing agreements and ensuring compliance with the Administrative Procedure Act and constitutional spending clause limitations is also advisable.

Contract Search Terms

data sharinggovernment dataconfidentialityprivacyTANFsocial security numbersimmigration statusdata minimizationauthorized useconsent

Laws Cited

Administrative Procedure ActSpending Clause of the U.S. Constitution

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Administration for Children and Families (ACF)

Industry

Other

Multistate Coalition

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) issued a notice"
Laws Cited
"violates the Administrative Procedure Act and the Spending Clause of the U.S. Constitution"
Violation Types
"illegal sharing of millions of TANF recipients’ private data"

Related Enforcement Actions

OR

Administration for Children and Families (ACF)

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield, joined by a coalition of 23 other states, the District of Columbia, and two governors, sued the Trump administration to block a new policy by the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) that would allow federal officials to access private records of millions of TANF recipients. The coalition argues the policy illegally shares sensitive personal data, including Social Security numbers and immigration status, with other federal agencies and private organizations, violating the Administrative Procedure Act and the Spending Clause. The lawsuit seeks to declare the policy illegal and block it from taking effect.

MN

Credit Acceptance Corporation

$75.5M

Minnesota AG Keith Ellison and a bipartisan coalition of 41 state attorneys general reached a settlement with subprime auto lender Credit Acceptance Corporation requiring it to pay the states $75.5 million and forgive more than $630 million in consumer debt nationwide. The settlement resolves allegations that the company financed auto loans it knew or should have known consumers could not afford, and financed the sale of expensive add-on products that consumers did not know they were purchasing. The company must also fundamentally reform its lending practices, including risk disclosures, loan balance waivers for high-risk defaults, and enhanced consent and cancellation protections for add-on products.

MN

Bipartisan Coalition of 16 State Attorneys General

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison joined a bipartisan coalition of 16 attorneys general in a letter to U.S. Senate Banking Committee leaders opposing the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, warning it would strip states of their ability to combat cryptocurrency scams and fraud. The letter cites over $10 million in crypto scam losses by Minnesotans in 18 months and urges Congress to preserve state registration regimes and enforcement authority. No company was charged and no penalty was imposed; this is legislative advocacy rather than an enforcement action.

MN

Minnesota Valley Cooperative Light and Power Association

Minnesota Attorney General Ellison reached a settlement with Minnesota Valley Cooperative Light and Power Association resolving allegations of deceptive and unfair practices, including disconnecting a customer's electricity despite the customer's need for life-sustaining medical equipment and failing to properly notify customers of consumer protections or offer appropriate payment plans. Under the consent judgment, the cooperative must provide separate disconnection notices, offer written payment plans, maintain records for AG oversight, and forgive amounts owed by the affected consumer.

MN

C4D, LLC

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison filed a lawsuit in Hennepin County against C4D, LLC, its owners Travis Benoit and Steven Legatt, and related entity Five Points Properties, LLC, alleging 18 counts of violating the Minnesota Human Rights Act, federal lending laws, and state consumer-fraud and contract-for-deed laws. The complaint alleges the defendants sold homes through predatory contracts for deed with inflated prices, hidden finance charges, and large annual balloon payments that leave buyers immediately underwater and forfeit all equity upon default, while targeting Somali-American Muslims on the basis of religion and national origin — a form of 'reverse redlining.' The AG seeks an injunction, civil penalties, and cancellation or reformation of existing contracts; no penalty amounts have been determined.

MN

Omega Dental Care

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison announced the first round of restitution, issuing 8 refund checks totaling $38,634 to consumers harmed by Omega Dental Care, a defunct Eden Prairie dental clinic owned and operated by Anne Soberay. The refunds, paid from the state's Consumer Protection Restitution Account (CPRA), compensate consumers who paid out of pocket for dental services that were never provided. The refunds follow an earlier settlement between the AG's office and Omega Dental Care and Soberay. Note: this is a consumer protection (non-delivery of services) action, not a privacy enforcement action; no privacy violation types from the taxonomy apply.