Civil rights enforcement action where Oregon Attorney General submitted evidence supporting a lawsuit against federal agents for excessive use of force and First Amendment violations during protests at the Portland ICE building. The AG urges the court to issue a preliminary injunction to stop unlawful crowd-control measures.
The Attorney General is seeking a preliminary injunction to prohibit federal agents from using tear gas, pepper balls, and other crowd-control munitions against peaceful protesters.
In-house legal teams should review agreements with government contractors, security service providers, and event venue operators. Focus on clauses requiring compliance with constitutional rights (particularly First Amendment assembly rights), use-of-force policies, indemnification provisions covering civil rights lawsuits, insurance requirements for law enforcement-related claims, and termination clauses for misconduct. Potential changes include adding certifications of compliance with crowd-control best practices, mandating body-camera or documentation requirements for on-site personnel, enhancing training obligations on de-escalation and protest management, and clarifying indemnity terms to allocate risk for excessive force claims by third parties.
Entity
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Also known as: ICE
Industry
OtherOfficial Press Release
https://www.doj.state.or.us/media-home/news-media-releases/g-rayfield-submits-evidence-in-lawsuit-challenging-use-of-force-by-ice-agents/
99 1 Ex1 Proposed Amicus Brief
https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/99-1-Ex1-Proposed-Amicus-Brief.pdf
Oregon Attorney General Enforcement Page
https://www.doj.state.or.us/consumer-protection/
"ICE"
"First Amendment"
"use of excessive force"
Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield secured a temporary restraining order blocking Paramount Skydance Corporation's proposed $110 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery. The lawsuit, joined by 11 other state attorneys general, alleges the merger would harm Oregonians through higher prices, lower content quality, and reduced competition in film and television distribution.
$29.6M
Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield and a bipartisan coalition of states reached a $29.6 million settlement with Glenmark, a generic drug manufacturer accused of conspiring with other pharmaceutical companies to inflate prices and limit competition for numerous generic prescription drugs. The settlement requires Glenmark to cooperate in ongoing multistate litigations and implement internal reforms to ensure fair competition and antitrust compliance.
Oregon Attorney General Rayfield and a coalition of 11 other attorneys general filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to block the $110 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. by Paramount Skydance Corporation. The lawsuit alleges the merger violates Section 7 of the Clayton Act by substantially lessening competition in theatrical film distribution and basic cable television licensing, which would lead to higher prices and reduced content quality for consumers.
$18.0M
A coalition of 42 state attorneys general settled bankruptcy claims against 23andMe following a 2023 data breach that compromised genetic data of 6.9 million customers. The settlement includes $150 million in allowed claims, with $18 million paid from bankruptcy funds, and requires enhanced data security measures for the successor entity, 23andMe Research Institute.
Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield and a coalition of 12 state attorneys general filed a lawsuit challenging the $110 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery by Paramount Skydance Corporation. The lawsuit alleges the merger violates Section 7 of the Clayton Act by substantially lessening competition in theatrical film distribution and basic cable television licensing, which could lead to higher prices and reduced choice for consumers.
The provided press release is a media release from the Oregon Department of Justice announcing a multistate press conference of attorneys general from Oregon, California, Washington, Nevada, and New York advocating for increased state resources to address antitrust enforcement gaps following reduced federal oversight. No privacy-related enforcement actions, violations, penalties, or remedies are described in the document.