Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Enforcement ActionLow RiskMultistate

Attorney General Rayfield Wins Lawsuit Against Trump Administration’s Illegal Tariffs

Trump AdministrationMay 7, 2026Oregon Attorney General

Summary

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield led a 24-state coalition in a lawsuit challenging the Trump Administration’s tariffs imposed under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. The U.S. Court of International Trade granted summary judgment to the states, ruling the tariffs illegal as they did not meet the statutory requirement of “large and serious balance-of-payment deficits.” The court invalidated the 10 percent tariffs on most global products, barring their enforcement.

Remedy

The U.S. Court of International Trade issued an order invalidating the Trump Administration’s 10 percent tariffs imposed under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, ruling they were unauthorized by law. The summary judgment in favor of the 24-state coalition prohibits enforcement of the illegal tariffs.

Injunction

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review vendor, supplier, and customer agreements for tariff-related provisions, including clauses governing import duties, tariff shifts, and trade compliance obligations. Supply chain agreements should be checked for force majeure clauses covering tariff changes, while customer contracts should include price adjustment terms tied to tariff modifications. All agreements involving international trade should be reviewed for compliance with the Trade Act of 1974 and International Emergency Economic Powers Act to mitigate future regulatory risk.

Contract Search Terms

tariff clauseimport dutySection 122 Trade Acttrade deficitbalance of paymentsInternational Emergency Economic Powers Acttariff compliancesupply chain tariff

Laws Cited

International Emergency Economic Powers ActSection 122 of the Trade Act of 1974
Section 122, Trade Act of 1974International Emergency Economic Powers Act

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Trump Administration

Industry

Other

Multistate Coalition

Arizona Attorney General Kris MayesCalifornia Attorney General Rob BontaNew York Attorney General Letitia JamesColorado Attorney GeneralConnecticut Attorney GeneralDelaware Attorney GeneralIllinois Attorney GeneralMaine Attorney GeneralMaryland Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Attorney GeneralMichigan Attorney GeneralMinnesota Attorney GeneralNevada Attorney GeneralNew Jersey Attorney GeneralNew Mexico Attorney GeneralNorth Carolina Attorney GeneralRhode Island Attorney GeneralVermont Attorney GeneralVirginia Attorney GeneralWashington Attorney GeneralWisconsin Attorney GeneralGovernor of KentuckyGovernor of Pennsylvania

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Trump Administration"
Laws Cited
"International Emergency Economic Powers Act"
Laws Cited
"Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974"
Remedy Summary
"the President’s tariffs proclamation “is invalid, and the tariffs imposed on Plaintiffs are unauthorized by law.”"
Event Date
"May 7, 2026"

Related Enforcement Actions

NJ

Trump Administration

A multistate coalition co-led by New Jersey won a federal court order rejecting the Trump Administration’s decision not to request funding for the CFPB. The order struck down that decision and directed the Administration to follow the law and fund the agency; no monetary penalty or privacy violation is described.

VA

Trump Administration

A federal judge permanently blocked the Trump administration from penalizing states over SNAP administration and struck down guidance restricting food assistance for certain lawful permanent residents. The release does not state the date of the court’s ruling, so the event date uses the publication date as a proxy.

MN

Trump Administration

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison joined a coalition of 20 attorneys general in suing the Trump administration over new federal contract terms intended to purge DEI. The lawsuit alleges the agencies violated the Administrative Procedure Act by failing to provide public notice or accept comments, exceeding legal authority, and imposing vague requirements that threaten severe penalties on contractors.

VA

Trump Administration

A coalition of 24 states led by Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones won a lawsuit against the Trump Administration, invalidating illegal tariffs imposed under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled the tariffs were unauthorized by law, as a trade deficit does not constitute the required 'large and serious balance-of-payment deficits' under the statute. The ruling prevents the administration from enforcing the 10% worldwide tariffs on most products.

OR

Trump Administration

Health enforcement action: Attorney General Rayfield led a coalition of 22 states and D.C. to secure a federal court order blocking the Trump Administration from threatening to cut off Medicare and Medicaid funding to healthcare providers that offer gender-affirming care to youth with gender dysphoria. The court ruled the administration's actions unlawful, protecting access to care and upholding the right to make personal healthcare decisions.

OR

Trump Administration

Consumer protection enforcement action where Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield led a coalition of 24 states in filing a motion for a preliminary injunction to stop the Trump Administration's imposition of tariffs on imported goods. The states argue the tariffs are unlawful under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, as they cause financial harm to consumers and state governments by increasing prices and procurement costs.