This press release announces Virginia's receipt of nearly $110 million from major tobacco companies under the 1998 Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement, a settlement resolving lawsuits against tobacco companies for deceptive marketing and consumer protection violations. The funds will support public health programs including the Virginia Healthcare Fund and Virginia Foundation for Healthy Youth. This document does not describe a privacy-related enforcement action.
Under the Master Settlement Agreement, Virginia and other participating states receive annual payments from tobacco companies to offset smoking-related healthcare costs. The agreement imposes restrictions on youth tobacco marketing, including bans on tobacco brand-name merchandise and tobacco-sponsored entertainment and sporting events. Disbursed funds are directed to public health programs such as the Virginia Healthcare Fund and Virginia Foundation for Healthy Youth.
For tobacco industry entities, in-house legal teams should review vendor, advertising, and distribution agreements for compliance with Master Settlement Agreement terms, including prohibitions on youth marketing, tobacco-branded merchandise, and sponsored events. Agreements should include clauses requiring adherence to state and federal tobacco laws, reporting obligations for underage sales, and terms governing settlement payment and enforcement compliance. This enforcement action has no relevance to privacy-related contracts or data protection clauses.
Entity
Major Tobacco Companies
Industry
Other"Virginia Receives Nearly $110 Million For its Diligent Enforcement of the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement"
"major tobacco companies"
"The Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement became active in 1998."
"Office of the Attorney General of Virginia"
"resolved Virginia's lawsuit against the major tobacco companies"
"The Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement became active in 1998."
Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones joined a coalition of 21 attorneys general in opposing a DHS rule that allows certain affirmative asylum applications to be referred to immigration court without an asylum officer interview. The coalition argues the rule violates federal law, harms asylum applicants, and bypasses notice-and-comment requirements; the release describes a comment letter, not a privacy enforcement action or monetary penalty.
Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones joined 22 attorneys general in a comment letter opposing a proposed USCIS rule that would impose a $103,265 tax on certain H-1B petitions. The coalition urged USCIS to withdraw the proposal, arguing it exceeds the agency’s authority, harms state staffing, and violates rulemaking requirements.
A federal judge permanently blocked the Trump administration from penalizing states over SNAP administration and struck down guidance restricting food assistance for certain lawful permanent residents. The release does not state the date of the court’s ruling, so the event date uses the publication date as a proxy.
Attorney General Jay Jones joined a coalition of 24 attorneys general in filing a comment letter opposing a proposed CMS rule that the coalition says oversteps federal law, could put Medicaid funding at risk, and interfere with state regulation of health insurance. The coalition urges CMS to withdraw or significantly revise the proposed rule.
Attorney General Jay Jones and a coalition of 24 attorneys general obtained a preliminary injunction blocking the Trump administration from demanding a database of state-owned records containing personal information of 17 million CDL drivers from AAMVA and from terminating over $10 million in federal funding. The lawsuits allege DOT, FMCSA, and DHS violated federal privacy laws by secretly creating a database with no guardrails on use or sharing of Social Security numbers and no public notice.
$694.0M
Virginia and 40 other state attorneys general settled with subprime auto lender Credit Acceptance Corporation (CAC) for $694 million in cash restitution and debt relief. The settlement resolves allegations that CAC originated loans it knew or should have known consumers could not afford, and that it encouraged and failed to prevent dealers from unlawfully 'packing' auto-loan contracts with unwanted Vehicle Service Contracts and GAP products. The Consent Judgment was filed September 17, 2026, with the City of Richmond Circuit Court.