Court Rules
All enforcement actions
GuidanceLow Risk

Virginia AG Announces Price Gouging Protections in Effect Amid Drought State of Emergency

No respondent entity (consumer advisory announcement)September 17, 2026Virginia Attorney General

Summary

Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones announced that Governor Spanberger's declaration of a state of emergency due to prolonged, severe drought has triggered Virginia's anti-price gouging statutes, making it unlawful to charge unconscionable prices for necessary goods and services. A price is unconscionable if it grossly exceeds the price charged during the ten days immediately prior to the emergency. No entity was charged or fined; the release is a consumer advisory explaining how to report suspected price gouging to the Attorney General's Consumer Protection Section.

Remedy

No remedies were imposed on any entity. The release announces that consumer protections under the Anti-Price Gouging Act are now active statewide and directs consumers to report suspected price gouging to the OAG Consumer Protection Section, except gasoline and motor fuel price complaints, which are handled by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.

Contract Impact

Although this action concerns consumer protection rather than privacy, it signals that Virginia's Anti-Price Gouging Act is actively enforceable through the Virginia Consumer Protection Act whenever a state of emergency is declared. In-house teams at companies selling essential goods and services (grocery, fuel, lodging, building supplies, agribusiness) should review customer-facing pricing terms, supply and vendor agreements, and any contracts containing automatic price escalation, surge pricing, or emergency surcharge clauses to confirm they cannot produce prices that grossly exceed the ten-day pre-emergency baseline during a declared emergency. Force majeure clauses should be checked to ensure they do not authorize price increases during emergencies, and supply agreements should include representations that pricing during declared emergencies complies with applicable state anti-price gouging laws. Companies with Virginia operations should also ensure consumer complaint-handling procedures route pricing complaints to legal for assessment.

Contract Search Terms

price gougingstate of emergencyunconscionable pricesnecessary goods and servicesforce majeureprice escalation clauseemergency surchargeanti-price gouging compliancepre-emergency baseline pricingconsumer protection act

Laws Cited

Virginia Anti-Price Gouging ActVirginia Consumer Protection Act

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

No respondent entity (consumer advisory announcement)

Industry

Other

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Title
"Attorney General Jones Announces Price Gouging Protections in Effect Amid Prolonged and Severe Drought Conditions Across the Commonwealth"
Event Date
"September 17, 2026"
Summary
"Governor Spanberger's declaration of a state of emergency triggered Virginia's anti-price gouging statutes."
Summary
"unconscionable prices" for "necessary goods and services" following a declared state of emergency"
Summary
"whether the post-disaster price grossly exceeds the price charged for the same good or services during the ten days"
Laws Cited
"Violations of Virginia's Anti-Price Gouging Act are enforceable by the Office of the Attorney General through the Virginia Consumer Protection Act."

Related Enforcement Actions

VA

Trump Administration

Virginia’s Attorney General joined a multistate lawsuit challenging a federal Medicaid rule that made it harder for medically vulnerable people to qualify for exemptions from work requirements. The court found the definition of medical frailty unlawful, vacated that language, and issued a permanent injunction; the release does not state the court decision’s date, so the release date is used as a proxy.

VA

General Motors

$220.0M

General Motors agreed to pay $220 million to resolve allegations that it sold identifiable driver behavior and location data to data brokers and insurers without adequately disclosing the practice or obtaining consumers’ consent. The settlement requires affirmative express consent before collecting or disclosing driving and location data, limits data collection, and imposes privacy-program assessments and dealership oversight and training.

VA

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)

Virginia joined a multistate lawsuit challenging a FinCEN rule that exempts nearly all businesses from beneficial-ownership reporting and the agency’s plan to delete ownership information already collected. The states allege violations of the Corporate Transparency Act and Administrative Procedure Act and seek to have the rule set aside and the ownership database maintained; no court outcome or monetary penalty is reported.

VA

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones joined a coalition of attorneys general in filing an amicus brief challenging DHS’s practice of conducting warrantless civil immigration arrests without determining whether individuals are likely to escape before a warrant can be obtained. The release reports that a district court had previously granted a preliminary injunction in the underlying case; it does not report a penalty or a new remedy imposed on DHS by this brief.

VA

Character Technologies, Inc.

Virginia joined a multistate coalition filing a notice in Character Technologies, Inc.’s bankruptcy proceedings, raising concerns about the company’s privacy and safety practices and the sensitive chatbot conversations it holds. The filing seeks protections for children and consumers in any sale or transfer of the business or assets; the release does not report a fine or final finding of violations.

VA

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones joined a multistate coalition submitting a comment letter opposing HHS’s proposed changes to Head Start standards. The release describes concerns about proposed reductions to requirements for child safety, staffing, health services, and other program protections; it reports no privacy enforcement action or penalty.