Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Enforcement ActionLow RiskMultistate

State AGs Sue HHS to Block $10B Child Care Funding Freeze

U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesJanuary 16, 2026California Attorney General

Summary

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, alongside attorneys general from New York, Colorado, Illinois, and Minnesota, filed a motion for preliminary injunction to continue blocking the Trump Administration's unlawful freeze of $10 billion in federal funding for child care and family assistance programs and to prevent broad data requests for personally identifiable information of millions of residents. The funding freeze targets five Democratic-led states without evidence of fraud, and the data requests are part of the challenged unlawful actions. A temporary restraining order was previously granted blocking these measures.

Remedy

The motion seeks to extend the court's temporary restraining order that blocks the funding freeze and prohibits HHS from enforcing its broad data and document requests related to state use of federal funding.

Injunction

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review agreements involving federal funding, such as vendor contracts with service providers for child care and family assistance programs, customer agreements with government entities, and data processing agreements. Key clauses to examine include data sharing and privacy provisions, government audit and oversight rights, termination conditions related to funding loss or government actions, and compliance with federal regulations. Changes may be needed to add explicit terms for handling funding freezes, protecting personally identifiable information from broad data requests, ensuring service continuity, and incorporating force majeure or similar provisions for unlawful government directives.

Contract Search Terms

federal grant agreementdata sharing provisionPII handling clausegovernment audit rightscompliance certificationfunding freeze clausedata request responseprivacy impact assessmenttermination due to funding losssubcontractor data obligations

Laws Cited

Administrative Procedure ActU.S. Constitution Appropriations ClauseU.S. Constitution Spending ClauseSeparation of Powers

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Also known as: Department of Health and Human Services

Industry

Other

Multistate Coalition

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"sued the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)"
Laws Cited
"violate the Administrative Procedure Act, the Separation of Powers, and the U.S. Constitution’s Appropriations Clause and Spending Clause"
Violation Types
"broad requests for data and documents related to the states’ use of the funding, including the personally identifiable information of millions of residents"

Related Enforcement Actions

CA

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

California Attorney General Rob Bonta sent a letter to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services opposing a proposed rule that would eliminate model card requirements for AI tools in healthcare, warning that such rollbacks could lead to biased and unsafe healthcare decisions by reducing transparency.

OR

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Civil rights and health enforcement action where Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield, joined by 11 other states, sued the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) over a policy that conditions federal health, education, and research funding on states' agreement to discriminate

CA

Paramount Skydance Corporation

A coalition of 12 state attorneys general, led by Colorado AG Phil Weiser, obtained a temporary restraining order from a federal court in California to halt the proposed $110 billion merger of Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. by Paramount Skydance Corporation. The lawsuit alleges the merger violates Section 7 of the Clayton Act by substantially lessening competition in film distribution, anticipated blockbuster film distribution, and licensing cable TV channels.

CA

California Privacy Protection Agency

The California Privacy Protection Agency (CalPrivacy) joined a coalition of 18 Attorneys General and state agencies in opposing the proposed SECURE Data Act, a federal privacy bill that would preempt stronger state privacy laws like the CCPA. The coalition argues the bill would weaken consumer privacy protections, limit enforcement remedies, and undermine California's Delete Request and Opt-out Platform (DROP).

CA

General Motors

$12.8M

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, along with multiple district attorneys and the California Privacy Protection Agency, announced a $12.75 million settlement with General Motors for illegally selling hundreds of thousands of Californians' location and driving data to data brokers Verisk and LexisNexis without notice or consent. The settlement includes the largest CCPA penalty to date, a five-year ban on selling driving data to consumer reporting agencies, and requirements to delete retained data and implement a robust privacy program.

CA

California Privacy Protection Agency

The California Privacy Protection Agency Board voted to support two bills (AB 1542 and SB 1106) and took a 'support if amended' position on a third bill (AB 883). These bills aim to strengthen privacy protections by expanding sensitive data protections, improving deletion rights under the Delete Act, and providing expedited deletion for elected officials and judges.