Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementCritical RiskMultistate

California AG Secures $12.75 Million Settlement with General Motors for Illegal Sale of Driving and Location Data

General MotorsMay 8, 2026California Attorney General

Penalty Amount

$12,750,000

Summary

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, along with multiple district attorneys and the California Privacy Protection Agency, announced a $12.75 million settlement with General Motors for illegally selling hundreds of thousands of Californians' location and driving data to data brokers Verisk and LexisNexis without notice or consent. The settlement includes the largest CCPA penalty to date, a five-year ban on selling driving data to consumer reporting agencies, and requirements to delete retained data and implement a robust privacy program.

Remedy

GM must pay $12.75 million in civil penalties, stop selling driving data to consumer reporting agencies for five years, delete driving data within 180 days absent express consent, request data brokers delete the data, develop a robust privacy program, and report privacy assessments to DOJ, district attorneys, and CalPrivacy.

Monetary PenaltyInjunctionData DeletionCompliance ProgramReporting RequirementsBan

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review vendor agreements with data brokers and analytics providers to ensure explicit consent and notice requirements are met before sharing consumer data. Key clauses to examine include data processing agreements, data sharing provisions, opt-out mechanisms, and data retention policies. Additionally, customer-facing privacy policies and terms of service should be audited to ensure they accurately describe data collection, use, and sharing practices, particularly for connected vehicle services like OnStar. Employee and customer contracts should include clear consent language for any secondary use of data beyond the original service purpose.

Contract Search Terms

data sharing agreementgeolocation datadriving behavior datadata brokeropt-out rightsdata minimizationpurpose limitationconsent for data saleprivacy compliance programdata retention policy

Laws Cited

California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)California's Unfair Competition Law
Cal. Civ. Code 1798.100 et seq.

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

General Motors

Industry

Automotive

Multistate Coalition

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"General Motors"
Fine Amount
"$12.75 million"
Laws Cited
"California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)"
Laws Cited
"California’s Unfair Competition Law"
Violation Types
"sold the names, contact information, geolocation data, and driving behavior data of hundreds of thousands of Californians to two data brokers"
Violation Types
"GM failed to give consumers any notice of the sales"

Related Enforcement Actions

CPPA

General Motors

$12.8M

CalPrivacy and the California Attorney General secured a $12.75 million settlement from General Motors for data sharing practices from connected vehicles. The settlement includes injunctive terms to change business practices.

TX

General Motors

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit against General Motors for unlawfully collecting private driving data from over 1.5 million Texas drivers without consent and selling the data to third parties including insurance companies. GM allegedly deceived customers into enrolling in products like OnStar Smart Driver by falsely claiming enrollment was required to retain vehicle safety features, while concealing that enrollment authorized systematic collection and sale of detailed driving data. The action follows an investigation launched in June 2024 as part of the Texas AG’s data privacy initiative, and seeks to hold GM accountable for violating state privacy laws.

CA

California State Legislature

The California Privacy Protection Agency announced that the California State Legislature approved the Expanding Privacy Rights Act (SB 923), which expands the CCPA's right to delete to cover all non-exempt personal information a business holds about a consumer, including data originally collected from third parties. The bill also requires online-only businesses with a direct relationship to consumers to provide online methods, such as webforms, for submitting access, deletion, and correction requests, and expressly permits businesses to retain suppression lists so deleted information stays deleted. The bill, authored by Senator Becker and sponsored by CalPrivacy, now goes to the Governor for consideration.

CA

Meta Platforms, Inc.

A bipartisan coalition of 33 state attorneys general, led by Minnesota AG Keith Ellison, began trial against Meta Platforms, Inc., alleging the company knowingly designed and deployed harmful features on Facebook and Instagram that drive children and teens to use the platforms compulsively, while falsely assuring parents and the public that its platforms were safe for young users. The states also allege Meta illegally collected personal information from children under 13 without parental consent, violating COPPA. The trial opened before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, with the states seeking monetary penalties and injunctive relief.

CA

Paramount Skydance Corporation

A coalition of 12 state attorneys general, led by Colorado AG Phil Weiser, obtained a temporary restraining order from a federal court in California to halt the proposed $110 billion merger of Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. by Paramount Skydance Corporation. The lawsuit alleges the merger violates Section 7 of the Clayton Act by substantially lessening competition in film distribution, anticipated blockbuster film distribution, and licensing cable TV channels.

CA

California Privacy Protection Agency

The California Privacy Protection Agency (CalPrivacy) joined a coalition of 18 Attorneys General and state agencies in opposing the proposed SECURE Data Act, a federal privacy bill that would preempt stronger state privacy laws like the CCPA. The coalition argues the bill would weaken consumer privacy protections, limit enforcement remedies, and undermine California's Delete Request and Opt-out Platform (DROP).