Court Rules
All enforcement actions
New LawLow Risk

California Opt Me Out Act (AB 566) Signed into Law

State of CaliforniaOctober 8, 2025California Attorney General

Summary

Governor Newsom signed the California Opt Me Out Act (AB 566), requiring browsers to offer built-in opt-out preference signals (OOPS) by January 2027. This makes California the first state to mandate that browsers provide easy-to-use tools for consumers to automatically communicate their privacy preferences to websites, closing a major gap in CCPA enforcement.

Remedy

Requires browsers operating in California to provide opt-out preference signals (OOPS) to allow users to automatically tell websites not to sell or share their personal information. Effective January 2027.

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review browser vendor agreements and technology procurement contracts to ensure that any browser-based products or services offered to California users include the mandated opt-out preference signals. Additionally, data processing agreements with websites and third parties must be updated to honor these signals when received, potentially requiring amendments to consent clauses, data sale provisions, and compliance obligations under the CCPA.

Contract Search Terms

opt-out preference signal (OOPS)browser requirementdata sale opt-outCCPA complianceGlobal Privacy Controlbrowser configurationconsumer privacy rightsdata sharing opt-outbrowser vendor agreementautomatic opt-out signal

Laws Cited

California Consumer Privacy ActCalifornia Opt Me Out Act (AB 566)
AB 566

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

State of California

Industry

Other

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Event Date
"October 8, 2025"
Entity Name
"Governor Newsom signed the California Opt Me Out Act (AB 566, Lowenthal)"
Laws Cited
"The California Opt Me Out Act (AB 566, Lowenthal)"
Laws Cited
"The California Consumer Privacy Act"
Summary
"requiring browsers to offer a simple, built-in way to tell websites not to sell or share their personal information"
Remedy Summary
"requires browsers operating in California to offer easy-to-use opt-out preference signals (OOPS)"

Related Enforcement Actions

CA

Meta Platforms, Inc.

A bipartisan coalition of 33 state attorneys general, led by Minnesota AG Keith Ellison, began trial against Meta Platforms, Inc., alleging the company knowingly designed and deployed harmful features on Facebook and Instagram that drive children and teens to use the platforms compulsively, while falsely assuring parents and the public that its platforms were safe for young users. The states also allege Meta illegally collected personal information from children under 13 without parental consent, violating COPPA. The trial opened before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, with the states seeking monetary penalties and injunctive relief.

CA

Paramount Skydance Corporation

A coalition of 12 state attorneys general, led by Colorado AG Phil Weiser, obtained a temporary restraining order from a federal court in California to halt the proposed $110 billion merger of Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. by Paramount Skydance Corporation. The lawsuit alleges the merger violates Section 7 of the Clayton Act by substantially lessening competition in film distribution, anticipated blockbuster film distribution, and licensing cable TV channels.

CA

California Privacy Protection Agency

The California Privacy Protection Agency (CalPrivacy) joined a coalition of 18 Attorneys General and state agencies in opposing the proposed SECURE Data Act, a federal privacy bill that would preempt stronger state privacy laws like the CCPA. The coalition argues the bill would weaken consumer privacy protections, limit enforcement remedies, and undermine California's Delete Request and Opt-out Platform (DROP).

CA

Meta Platforms, Inc.

A bipartisan coalition of state attorneys general began trial against Meta Platforms, Inc., alleging the company knowingly designed addictive features on Facebook and Instagram that harm children and teens, deceived parents about platform safety, and illegally collected personal information from children under 13 without parental consent in violation of COPPA. The states seek monetary penalties, an injunction to stop unlawful practices, and other relief. The trial is being litigated in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

CA

General Motors

$12.8M

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, along with multiple district attorneys and the California Privacy Protection Agency, announced a $12.75 million settlement with General Motors for illegally selling hundreds of thousands of Californians' location and driving data to data brokers Verisk and LexisNexis without notice or consent. The settlement includes the largest CCPA penalty to date, a five-year ban on selling driving data to consumer reporting agencies, and requirements to delete retained data and implement a robust privacy program.

CA

California Privacy Protection Agency

The California Privacy Protection Agency Board voted to support two bills (AB 1542 and SB 1106) and took a 'support if amended' position on a third bill (AB 883). These bills aim to strengthen privacy protections by expanding sensitive data protections, improving deletion rights under the Delete Act, and providing expedited deletion for elected officials and judges.