Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementLow Risk

Colorado AG settlement with Sares Regis Group over source-of-income (housing voucher) discrimination

Sares Regis GroupSeptember 17, 2026Colorado Attorney General

Penalty Amount

$30,000

Summary

Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser announced a settlement with Sares Regis Group, a Denver-metro property management company, after an investigation found it told prospective tenants that rental subsidies and housing vouchers were not accepted at its properties, in violation of the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act and the Colorado Consumer Protection Act. Under the settlement, the company must adopt written source-of-income policies, train leasing employees, submit a compliance report to the AG's office, and refrain from misrepresenting its voucher acceptance, and it pays $30,000 to the Housing Rights Initiative. Note: this is a fair-housing enforcement action, not a privacy matter, so no privacy violation taxonomy categories apply.

Remedy

Sares Regis Group must comply with all state and federal housing laws including source-of-income nondiscrimination, adopt and implement written policies ensuring acceptance of lawful sources of income including housing vouchers, train employees involved in leasing and tenant communications on fair housing requirements, and provide a compliance report to the attorney general's office detailing its policies and whether it is renting to tenants using rental assistance. The agreement also prohibits the company from misrepresenting whether it accepts housing vouchers or other lawful sources of income in the future, and it must pay $30,000 to the Housing Rights Initiative to support fair housing enforcement and education efforts.

Monetary PenaltyInjunctionConsent DecreeCompliance ProgramReporting Requirements

Contract Impact

Although this is a fair-housing enforcement action rather than a privacy matter, in-house teams overseeing property management or real estate operations should review property management agreements, leasing vendor and marketing/advertising contracts, and employee training policies for source-of-income nondiscrimination language. Check compliance-with-law clauses requiring adherence to the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act and federal fair housing laws; verify that tenant qualification criteria, leasing scripts, and third-party leasing agent instructions do not exclude Housing Choice Vouchers or Section 8; and confirm agreements obligate staff training and periodic compliance reporting on voucher acceptance. Standard privacy contract clauses (data processing, breach notification, opt-out mechanisms) are not implicated here, but representations-and-warranties regarding regulatory compliance in property management and leasing agreements should be updated to expressly cover lawful-source-of-income obligations and accurate communications with prospective tenants.

Contract Search Terms

source of incomehousing voucherSection 8rental assistancetenant screening criteriafair housingleasing policiesanti-discriminationcompliance report

Laws Cited

Colorado Anti-Discrimination ActColorado Consumer Protection Act

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Sares Regis Group

Industry

Real Estate

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"settlement with Sares Regis Group, a property management company operating in the Denver metro area"
Event Date
"Sept. 17, 2026"
Fine Amount
"Pay $30,000 to the Housing Rights Initiative to support fair housing enforcement and education efforts."
Laws Cited
"violated the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act and the Colorado Consumer Protection Act"
Summary
"the company discriminated against prospective tenants by refusing to accept housing vouchers, including Section 8"
Remedy Types
"Adopt and implement written policies to ensure acceptance of lawful sources of income, including housing vouchers."

Related Enforcement Actions

CO

Toast, Inc.

Colorado, the FTC, and a bipartisan group of state attorneys general sued Toast, alleging misleading claims about its subscription services and financial products, undisclosed fees, and obstacles to cancelling subscriptions. The coalition is asking the court for an injunction, monetary relief, civil penalties, and other relief; the press release does not report an imposed penalty.

CO

General Motors

$220.0M

General Motors agreed to a nationwide $220 million settlement over allegations that it sold drivers’ identifiable driving behavior and location data to data brokers, which then sold it to insurers. The settlement requires affirmative express consent before collecting or disclosing driving and location data, limits data collection, and imposes privacy-program assessments and dealership oversight and training.

CO

U.S. Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)

Colorado joined a 21-attorney-general coalition suing to challenge a FinCEN rule that exempts nearly all businesses from Corporate Transparency Act ownership-reporting requirements, as well as plans to delete existing ownership records. The coalition alleges violations of the Corporate Transparency Act and Administrative Procedure Act and asks the court to invalidate the rule and require FinCEN to continue collecting and maintaining the records.

CO

Colorado Domestic Violence Fatality Review Board

The Colorado Domestic Violence Fatality Review Board’s 2026 report describes domestic violence fatalities in Colorado and identifies trends and prevention opportunities. It is a public report, not a privacy enforcement action, and the release announces no penalty or remedy.

CO

PlayPower and Burke

Colorado, the FTC, and a bipartisan group of state attorneys general filed suit to block PlayPower’s proposed acquisition of Burke, alleging the merger would reduce competition in the commercial playground equipment market. They ask the court to permanently enjoin the merger and award costs, attorneys’ fees, and other appropriate relief.

CO

Character Technologies, Inc.

Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser led a multistate coalition in filing a notice in Character Technologies, Inc.’s bankruptcy, citing concerns about the company’s safety and privacy practices and sensitive chatbot conversations involving children and adults. The filing seeks protections in any sale or transfer of the company’s business or assets; no penalty or final remedy is reported.