Court Rules
All enforcement actions
CoalitionLow RiskMultistate

CT AG Coalition Presses Meta Over AI Weight Loss Ads

MetaDecember 23, 2025Connecticut Attorney General

Summary

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, leading a coalition of 35 attorneys general, urged Meta to enforce its policies against misleading AI-generated weight loss ads on Instagram and Facebook. The ads promote non-FDA approved GLP-1 drugs without disclosing risks and use fake AI content. The coalition demands Meta restrict such ads, require clear risk disclosures, and label AI-generated content.

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review contracts with advertising platforms and vendors to ensure they include clauses that prohibit misleading health advertisements, require disclosure of AI-generated content, mandate compliance with FDA regulations for drug promotions, and provide for audit rights and corrective actions for violations.

Contract Search Terms

AI-generated content disclosurehealth advertising complianceweight loss product claimsFDA approval verificationmisleading ad policiesconsumer risk disclosureplatform advertising standardsdeceptive marketing clauses

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Meta

Industry

Social Media

Multistate Coalition

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Meta"
Violation Types
"without disclosing the risks and side effects of these medications"

Related Enforcement Actions

TX

Meta

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton launched an investigation into Meta regarding its Meta AI Glasses, alleging unlawful collection of facial biometric data, deceptive privacy representations, and unauthorized sharing of user data with subcontractors. The investigation follows concerns that the glasses’ always-on recording mode lacks proper notice, subcontractors access private user content including intimate moments, and Meta plans to deploy facial recognition technology to collect unsuspecting individuals’ facial geometry. The AG issued a Civil Investigative Demand to determine if Meta violated Texas law by deceptively misrepresenting its data use practices.

TX

Meta

$1.4B

Meta captured facial recognition data from millions of Texans without consent, violating Texas biometric privacy laws. The company agreed to pay $1.4 billion over five years to settle the case. This is the largest privacy settlement obtained by a single state.

NY

Meta

A coalition of 42 attorneys general filed a federal lawsuit against Meta, alleging that the company designed addictive features that harm youth mental health and violated COPPA by collecting children's data without parental consent. The lawsuit seeks injunctive relief, monetary penalties, and restitution.

FTC

Meta

The FTC proposed modifications to its 2020 privacy order with Meta, alleging violations including non-compliance with the order, misleading parents about Messenger Kids, and unauthorized data sharing. The proposed changes include banning monetization of youth data, pausing new product launches, and strengthening privacy requirements.

CT

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

On May 11, 2026, Connecticut Attorney General William Tong led a bipartisan coalition of 21 attorneys general in submitting a comment letter to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) urging the agency to abandon draft guidance that would ease approvals for flavored e-cigarette products. The coalition argues the guidance ignores evidence that flavored e-cigarettes disproportionately drive youth addiction and that FDA has failed to enforce existing authorization requirements for e-cigarette products. The letter references past tobacco and e-cigarette enforcement actions, including the 1998 tobacco master settlement agreement and the 2022 $438.5 million settlement with JUUL Labs.

CT

Bad actor platforms

Connecticut’s legislature passed House Bill 5312, creating new civil enforcement mechanisms for deepfake digital sexual assault, including unauthorized dissemination of synthetically created intimate images and AI-generated child pornography. The bill establishes a private right of action for victims and empowers the Connecticut Attorney General to pursue civil injunctions and penalties against abusers and platforms hosting illegal content. This builds on prior Connecticut laws criminalizing unauthorized intimate image dissemination.