Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Enforcement ActionHigh RiskMultistate

State AGs Sue Meta for Addictive Features and COPPA Breaches

MetaOctober 24, 2023New York Attorney General

Summary

A coalition of 42 attorneys general filed a federal lawsuit against Meta, alleging that the company designed addictive features that harm youth mental health and violated COPPA by collecting children's data without parental consent. The lawsuit seeks injunctive relief, monetary penalties, and restitution.

Remedy

The lawsuit requests an injunction to halt the deployment of harmful features, monetary penalties, and restitution for affected users.

InjunctionMonetary PenaltyConsumer Refunds

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review all vendor, customer, and data processing agreements that involve minor users or youth-oriented services, particularly those related to social media platforms, educational tools, or gaming. Specific clauses to scrutinize include: data collection consent mechanisms (ensuring verifiable parental consent for users under 13), age verification procedures, restrictions on addictive or manipulative design features (e.g., infinite scroll, push notifications), algorithmic transparency requirements, data retention schedules for minor data, and user safety/disclosure obligations. Agreements may need amendments to incorporate robust age-gating, obtain explicit parental consent, limit features that encourage compulsive use, add clear warnings about mental health risks, and ensure compliance with COPPA and analogous state laws. Employee agreements involving access to minor data should also be assessed.

Contract Search Terms

parental consent mechanismage verification processdata collection from minorsaddictive design featuresCOPPA compliance clauseuser safety featuresalgorithmic transparencycompulsive use mitigationminor data handlingyouth mental health safeguards

Laws Cited

COPPA

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Meta

Industry

Social Media

Multistate Coalition

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Meta"
Laws Cited
"Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)"
Violation Types
"Meta routinely collects data on children under 13 without informing parents or obtaining parental consent"
Violation Types
"designed and deployed harmful features on Instagram, Facebook, and its other social media platforms that purposefully addict children and teens"

Related Enforcement Actions

TX

Meta

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton launched an investigation into Meta regarding its Meta AI Glasses, alleging unlawful collection of facial biometric data, deceptive privacy representations, and unauthorized sharing of user data with subcontractors. The investigation follows concerns that the glasses’ always-on recording mode lacks proper notice, subcontractors access private user content including intimate moments, and Meta plans to deploy facial recognition technology to collect unsuspecting individuals’ facial geometry. The AG issued a Civil Investigative Demand to determine if Meta violated Texas law by deceptively misrepresenting its data use practices.

CT

Meta

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, leading a coalition of 35 attorneys general, urged Meta to enforce its policies against misleading AI-generated weight loss ads on Instagram and Facebook. The ads promote non-FDA approved GLP-1 drugs without disclosing risks and use fake AI content. The coalition demands Meta restrict such ads, require clear risk disclosures, and label AI-generated content.

TX

Meta

$1.4B

Meta captured facial recognition data from millions of Texans without consent, violating Texas biometric privacy laws. The company agreed to pay $1.4 billion over five years to settle the case. This is the largest privacy settlement obtained by a single state.

FTC

Meta

The FTC proposed modifications to its 2020 privacy order with Meta, alleging violations including non-compliance with the order, misleading parents about Messenger Kids, and unauthorized data sharing. The proposed changes include banning monetization of youth data, pausing new product launches, and strengthening privacy requirements.

NY

N/A

New York Attorney General Letitia James issued a consumer alert on May 18, 2026, warning residents of potential price gouging by transportation service providers during the Long Island Rail Road strike. The alert reminds businesses that New York’s price gouging laws prohibit unconscionable price increases on essential services like transportation during market disruptions. No specific privacy violations or enforcement actions against individual entities were announced in the alert.

NY

No specific entity cited

New York Attorney General Letitia James issued a consumer alert on May 18, 2026, warning businesses against engaging in price gouging on transportation services during the Long Island Rail Road strike. The alert reminds businesses that New York’s price gouging laws prohibit unconscionable price increases on essential goods and services during market disruptions, with potential penalties of up to $25,000 per violation. No specific enforcement action against a particular entity was announced, only a general warning for businesses and a call for consumers to report suspected price gouging.