Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementMedium Risk

CT AG Settles Spruce Power 3 for $100K Over Billing and Warranty Violations

Spruce Power 3, LLCMarch 12, 2026Connecticut Attorney General

Penalty Amount

$100,000

Summary

The Connecticut Attorney General announced a $100,000 settlement with Spruce Power 3, LLC to resolve an investigation into billing, customer service, and warranty issues stemming from consumer complaints. The settlement includes refunds for improper charges and requires reforms to improve billing practices and response times. Separately, an investigation was initiated into SunStrong Management LLC based on approximately 65 consumer complaints regarding warranty failures, unresponsiveness, and fees.

Remedy

Spruce Power must pay a $100,000 monetary penalty, provide refunds for improper charges, and implement a compliance program to ensure timely responses to consumer complaints and improved billing practices.

Monetary PenaltyConsumer RefundsCompliance Program

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review solar energy contracts for clauses related to billing accuracy, warranty terms, customer service response times, and procedures for contract assignments or transfers. Ensure contracts include clear refund policies, dispute resolution mechanisms, and obligations for handling consumer complaints to avoid similar enforcement actions.

Contract Search Terms

solar contract billingwarranty compliancecustomer service standardsrefund policiescontract transferconsumer complaint handlingsolar lease agreementspower purchase agreementsbilling accuracyservice response times

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Spruce Power 3, LLC

Also known as: Spruce Power 3

Industry

Technology

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Spruce Power 3, LLC"
Fine Amount
"$100,000 payment"
Violation Types
"billing, customer service, warranty issues"

Related Enforcement Actions

CT

SunRun, Inc.

$500K

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced settlements with SunRun, Inc., Elevate Solar Solutions, and two salespeople over allegations of deceptive solar sales, including impersonating consumers and locking homeowners into long-term contracts without consent. SunRun must pay $300,000 and provide consumer relief; Elevate and the salespeople face a stated $200,000 penalty, with $100,000 suspended subject to ongoing compliance.

CT

Mylan

$8.0M

Connecticut announced an $8 million settlement with Mylan over allegations that it used agreements to delay generic EpiPen competitors and took other actions that inflated prices. Mylan also agreed to provide 10,000 free EpiPens; the release states that Mylan denies wrongdoing.

CT

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined a coalition of 22 attorneys general in filing an amicus brief challenging DHS’s policy and practice of conducting warrantless civil immigration arrests. The press release describes a court challenge, not a privacy enforcement action or monetary penalty.

CT

Frontier Communications Parent Inc.

$625K

Connecticut reached a $625,000 settlement with Frontier Communications Parent Inc. over an April 2024 breach in which compromised employee and vendor credentials were used to access internal systems and exfiltrate unencrypted personal information of 58,841 Connecticut residents. The settlement requires Frontier to strengthen its security program, implement specific safeguards and training, and obtain an independent third-party assessment.

CT

Boston Children’s Health Physicians and XTIUM

$2.6M

Connecticut and New York found that Boston Children’s Health Physicians and its security vendor, XTIUM, failed to use reasonable safeguards, resulting in hackers accessing sensitive personal, medical, and employee information. The companies agreed to pay penalties totaling $2.64 million and implement enhanced cybersecurity measures.

CT

Character Technologies, Inc.

Connecticut joined a coalition of state attorneys general filing a notice in Character Technologies, Inc.’s bankruptcy proceedings, raising concerns about the company’s safety and privacy practices and the sensitive information it holds. The states seek protections for children and consumers if the company’s business or assets are sold or transferred; the filing does not impose a fine or other remedy.