Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Enforcement ActionLow RiskMultistate

CT AG and FTC Sue Uber Over Deceptive Uber One Subscription Practices

Uber Technologies, LLC and Uber USA, LLCDecember 15, 2025Connecticut Attorney General

Summary

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, along with the FTC and 21 other states and counties, filed a lawsuit against Uber Technologies, LLC and Uber USA, LLC for deceptive practices related to their Uber One subscription service. The lawsuit alleges Uber used negative option marketing, misled consumers about savings, made cancellation difficult, and charged consumers prematurely. The action seeks restitution, penalties, and an injunction under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act and the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act.

Remedy

The lawsuit seeks restitution for affected consumers, monetary penalties, an injunction to stop the deceptive practices, and costs.

Monetary PenaltyInjunctionConsumer Refunds

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review all customer-facing subscription and service agreements, particularly those for membership or loyalty programs like 'Uber One.' Focus on clauses governing free trials and negative option offers, automatic renewal terms, cancellation procedures (including ease of cancellation and any required steps), billing and payment timing representations, and any express or implied promises about cost savings or discounts. Changes may be needed to ensure clear, conspicuous disclosures about automatic charges, simple cancellation mechanisms (e.g., a single-step process), accurate savings calculations, and compliance with specific state and federal laws on online shoppers' confidence and unfair trade practices.

Contract Search Terms

negative option marketingfree trial enrollmentcancellation processbilling datesavings claimsautomatic renewalsubscription agreementconsumer consentunfair trade practicesRestore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act

Laws Cited

Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices ActU.S. Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Uber Technologies, LLC and Uber USA, LLC

Also known as: Uber

Industry

Technology

Multistate Coalition

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Uber Technologies, LLC and Uber USA, LLC"
Laws Cited
"Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act"
Laws Cited
"U.S. Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act"
Violation Types
"Uber improperly used negative option marketing tactics when it offered free trial subscriptions – a practice that automatically charges consumers if they do not cancel a free trial."
Violation Types
"the companies made it extraordinarily difficult to cancel Uber One once enrolled."

Related Enforcement Actions

CT

Zillow Group, Inc. and Redfin Corporation

$2.0M

Attorney General Tong and a coalition of four other states and the FTC sued Zillow and Redfin after Zillow paid Redfin $100 million to shut down its multifamily rental advertising business and transfer clients to Zillow. The settlement requires the companies to restore competition, with Redfin rebuilding its apartment advertising business, and pay $2 million to the coalition.

CT

Anthem, ConnectiCare, and UnitedHealthcare

Attorney General William Tong sent a letter to the Connecticut Insurance Department urging rejection of double-digit rate increases sought by Anthem, ConnectiCare, and UnitedHealthcare for individual and small group health insurance plans covering about 220,000 people. The letter argues the rates exceed inflationary measures and criticizes the carriers for failing to control costs and for poor claims system management, particularly ConnectiCare's transition to Molina Healthcare.

CT

TaxAct

$275K

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced a $275,000 settlement with TaxAct, an online tax preparation company, over allegations that between January 2018 and December 2022, TaxAct improperly disclosed detailed customer financial information to Meta and Google through third-party tracking technologies without notifying taxpayers. The settlement requires TaxAct to pay $275,000 and implement new third-party tracking compliance measures, including a review committee, written policies, a tag monitoring system, and two independent third-party audits.

CT

Manchester City Nissan

$4.0M

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong and the Federal Trade Commission announced a $4 million settlement with Manchester City Nissan (Chase Nissan LLC) resolving allegations that the dealership double-charged for 'certified pre-owned' vehicles and collected unauthorized junk fees. The settlement requires payment for consumer redress, prohibits misrepresentations, mandates clear disclosure of the maximum total price, and requires express informed consent for all charges.

CT

U.S. Department of Transportation

Attorney General Tong and a coalition of 21 attorneys general and Pennsylvania filed lawsuits against the U.S. Department of Transportation, FMCSA, and DHS to block demands for the personal information of 17 million CDL drivers. The lawsuits allege violations of federal privacy laws and the Administrative Procedure Act, and seek an emergency order to prevent the data transfer.

CT

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

Attorney General William Tong and a coalition of 10 attorneys general filed a lawsuit challenging a new OCC rule that preempts state laws requiring national banks to pay interest on homeowners' mortgage escrow accounts. The lawsuit argues the OCC ignored federal court decisions and bypassed safeguards, and seeks to block the rule.