Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Enforcement ActionLow RiskMultistate

CT AG and FTC Sue Uber Over Deceptive Uber One Subscription Practices

Uber Technologies, LLC and Uber USA, LLCDecember 15, 2025Connecticut Attorney General

Summary

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, along with the FTC and 21 other states and counties, filed a lawsuit against Uber Technologies, LLC and Uber USA, LLC for deceptive practices related to their Uber One subscription service. The lawsuit alleges Uber used negative option marketing, misled consumers about savings, made cancellation difficult, and charged consumers prematurely. The action seeks restitution, penalties, and an injunction under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act and the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act.

Remedy

The lawsuit seeks restitution for affected consumers, monetary penalties, an injunction to stop the deceptive practices, and costs.

Monetary PenaltyInjunctionConsumer Refunds

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review all customer-facing subscription and service agreements, particularly those for membership or loyalty programs like 'Uber One.' Focus on clauses governing free trials and negative option offers, automatic renewal terms, cancellation procedures (including ease of cancellation and any required steps), billing and payment timing representations, and any express or implied promises about cost savings or discounts. Changes may be needed to ensure clear, conspicuous disclosures about automatic charges, simple cancellation mechanisms (e.g., a single-step process), accurate savings calculations, and compliance with specific state and federal laws on online shoppers' confidence and unfair trade practices.

Contract Search Terms

negative option marketingfree trial enrollmentcancellation processbilling datesavings claimsautomatic renewalsubscription agreementconsumer consentunfair trade practicesRestore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act

Laws Cited

Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices ActU.S. Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Uber Technologies, LLC and Uber USA, LLC

Also known as: Uber

Industry

Technology

Multistate Coalition

Federal Trade CommissionAlabamaArizonaDistrict of ColumbiaIllinoisMichiganMinnesotaMissouriMontanaNebraskaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew YorkNorth CarolinaOhioOklahomaPennsylvaniaVirginiaWest VirginiaWisconsinAlameda County District Attorney

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Uber Technologies, LLC and Uber USA, LLC"
Laws Cited
"Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act"
Laws Cited
"U.S. Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act"
Violation Types
"Uber improperly used negative option marketing tactics when it offered free trial subscriptions – a practice that automatically charges consumers if they do not cancel a free trial."
Violation Types
"the companies made it extraordinarily difficult to cancel Uber One once enrolled."

Related Enforcement Actions

CT

SunRun, Inc.

$500K

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced settlements with SunRun, Inc., Elevate Solar Solutions, and two salespeople over allegations of deceptive solar sales, including impersonating consumers and locking homeowners into long-term contracts without consent. SunRun must pay $300,000 and provide consumer relief; Elevate and the salespeople face a stated $200,000 penalty, with $100,000 suspended subject to ongoing compliance.

CT

Mylan

$8.0M

Connecticut announced an $8 million settlement with Mylan over allegations that it used agreements to delay generic EpiPen competitors and took other actions that inflated prices. Mylan also agreed to provide 10,000 free EpiPens; the release states that Mylan denies wrongdoing.

CT

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined a coalition of 22 attorneys general in filing an amicus brief challenging DHS’s policy and practice of conducting warrantless civil immigration arrests. The press release describes a court challenge, not a privacy enforcement action or monetary penalty.

CT

Frontier Communications Parent Inc.

$625K

Connecticut reached a $625,000 settlement with Frontier Communications Parent Inc. over an April 2024 breach in which compromised employee and vendor credentials were used to access internal systems and exfiltrate unencrypted personal information of 58,841 Connecticut residents. The settlement requires Frontier to strengthen its security program, implement specific safeguards and training, and obtain an independent third-party assessment.

CT

Boston Children’s Health Physicians and XTIUM

$2.6M

Connecticut and New York found that Boston Children’s Health Physicians and its security vendor, XTIUM, failed to use reasonable safeguards, resulting in hackers accessing sensitive personal, medical, and employee information. The companies agreed to pay penalties totaling $2.64 million and implement enhanced cybersecurity measures.

CT

Character Technologies, Inc.

Connecticut joined a coalition of state attorneys general filing a notice in Character Technologies, Inc.’s bankruptcy proceedings, raising concerns about the company’s safety and privacy practices and the sensitive information it holds. The states seek protections for children and consumers if the company’s business or assets are sold or transferred; the filing does not impose a fine or other remedy.