Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Enforcement ActionCritical Risk

Court Orders Operator of Timeshare Exit Scheme to Pay $140 Million Related to FTC Allegations the Scheme Took Millions from Consumers

Christopher CarrollApril 20, 2026Federal Trade Commission

Penalty Amount

$140,000,000

Summary

Following an FTC investigation, a federal court granted summary judgment against timeshare exit scheme operator Christopher Carroll, ordering him to pay $140 million total ($95 million in consumer redress, $45 million civil penalty) for defrauding consumers out of over $90 million. The scheme used deceptive direct mail and in-person pitches, falsely claimed affiliation with timeshare companies, failed to provide refunds, and violated the FTC’s Cooling-Off Rule by forcing consumers to sign non-cancellable contracts. Carroll is also permanently banned from marketing timeshare exit services or engaging in deceptive door-to-door sales.

Remedy

The court ordered Christopher Carroll to pay $140 million total, consisting of $95 million in redress to consumers and a $45 million civil penalty. Carroll is permanently banned from advertising, marketing, promoting, or offering any timeshare exit services, engaging in deceptive door-to-door sales, or other deceptive conduct outlined in the complaint. The order also imposes a permanent injunction barring the specified deceptive practices.

Monetary PenaltyConsumer RefundsInjunctionBan

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams, particularly those in the real estate or timeshare industries, should review customer-facing and consumer contracts to ensure full compliance with the FTC Cooling-Off Rule, including explicit three-business-day cancellation rights for door-to-door sales. Marketing vendor agreements and sales presentation contracts must be audited to prohibit deceptive claims such as false affiliation with third-party timeshare companies, undisclosed exorbitant fees, and unenforceable non-cancellation clauses. Refund policy clauses should be clear, enforceable, and honored in practice, while all consumer contracts should include representations and warranties against deceptive practices and indemnification provisions for FTC rule violations. Companies using direct mail or in-person sales pitches should also review advertising vendor agreements to align with truth-in-advertising standards.

Contract Search Terms

Cooling-Off Rule compliancecontract cancellation clauserefund policydeceptive marketing representationsdoor-to-door sales termsfalse affiliation clausetimeshare service agreement

Laws Cited

FTC Cooling-Off Rule

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Christopher Carroll

Industry

Real Estate

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Christopher Carroll"
Fine Amount
"$140 million"
Laws Cited
"FTC’s Cooling-Off Rule"
Violation Types
"falsely claiming to be associated with timeshare companies; falsely telling consumers that they couldn’t exit a timeshare without paying the defendants’ exorbitant fees; failing to provide promised refunds; and forcing consumers to sign contracts that they were told they couldn’t cancel in violation of the FTC’s Cooling-Off Rule"
Remedy Types
"permanently bans Carroll from advertising, marketing, promoting, or offering for sale any timeshare exit service; from engaging in any deceptive door-to-door sales; and from engaging in other deceptive and misleading conduct"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

Credit Glory LLC

The FTC filed a complaint against Credit Glory LLC and related entities for deceptive credit repair practices, including false promises, impersonating debt collectors, charging illegal upfront fees, and using negative option billing without consent. A federal court temporarily halted the operation.

FTC

Federal Trade Commission

The FTC issued a policy statement abandoning disparate-impact liability, stating it will no longer bring claims based on this theory. It also modified compliance obligations for several companies based on past decisions.

FTC

Hims & Hers

The FTC, along with Utah and California, filed a complaint against Hims & Hers alleging the telehealth provider shared consumers' sensitive health information with third-party advertising platforms without consent, and deceived consumers about billing and cancellation practices. The complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act and the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act.

FTC

Elite Events and Tickets LLC

$300K

The FTC alleged that Elite Events and Tickets LLC, doing business as Smart Scalpers, violated the Better Online Ticket Sales Act by circumventing security measures to bypass ticket purchase limits for over 2,400 events, reselling tickets at a profit. The proposed order requires payment of $300,000 (with a total penalty of $10.7 million partially suspended) and permanently prohibits the company and its owners from engaging in such circumvention tactics.

FTC

Dennise Merdjanian

$45.9M

The FTC permanently banned Dennise Merdjanian from the debt relief industry and telemarketing after she and Superior Servicing LLC allegedly ran a student loan forgiveness scam that took more than $45.9 million from consumers. The proposed stipulated order imposes a partially suspended monetary judgment and resolves the FTC's litigation against the remaining defendants.

FTC

Alexander Mashinsky, Shlomi Daniel Leon, and Hanoch Goldstein

$16.5M

The FTC charged the founders of Celsius Network with deceiving consumers by falsely promising that cryptocurrency deposits were safe and always available. The founders agreed to pay $16.5 million and are banned from marketing or selling products that can be used to deposit or withdraw assets, among other restrictions.