The FTC settled with NTT Global Data Centers Americas, Inc. for deceiving consumers about its participation in the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield framework. The company's certification lapsed in 2018, but it continued to claim compliance in its privacy policy and marketing materials. Under the settlement, NTT is prohibited from misrepresenting its participation in any privacy program and must apply Privacy Shield protections to previously collected personal data or delete it.
The company is banned from misrepresenting its participation in privacy or data security programs and must either maintain Privacy Shield-level protections for personal data collected during participation or delete or return that data.
In-house legal teams should review vendor, customer, and data processing agreements that involve international data transfers or reference privacy frameworks like Privacy Shield. Focus on clauses where the company represents participation in or compliance with specific privacy or data security programs (e.g., Privacy Shield, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework), cross-border data transfer mechanisms (e.g., Standard Contractual Clauses), and data handling obligations (retention, deletion). Changes may be needed to: (1) require parties to verify and maintain accuracy of any certification or participation claims; (2) add notification obligations if a certification lapses; (3) include fallback data protection measures (e.g., deletion or application of equivalent safeguards) if a referenced framework is no longer valid; and (4) ensure marketing materials and privacy policies attached to contracts do not misrepresent participation in any government-sponsored or self-regulatory program.
Entity
NTT Global Data Centers Americas, Inc.
Also known as: NTT Global Data Centers Americas
Industry
TechnologyOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2020/10/ftc-finalizes-settlement-data-center-company-over-allegations-it-deceived-consumers-about-its
1823189d09386ragingwireorder2
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/1823189d09386ragingwireorder2.pdf
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"NTT Global Data Centers Americas, Inc. (NTT), formerly known as RagingWire Data Centers, Inc."
"allegedly deceived consumers about its participation in the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield framework"
$930K
The FTC finalized orders requiring CMG Media Corporation (doing business as Cox Media Group), MindSift LLC, and 1010 Digital Works LLC to pay a total of $930,000 for falsely claiming they offered an AI-powered service that could target ads based on conversations captured from consumers' smart devices, and that consumers had opted into such targeting. The orders also prohibit the companies from making misrepresentations about their advertising services, voice data collection, and consumer consent.
The FTC announced it is seeking public comment on a proposed enforcement policy statement regarding personalized pricing, which is the use of personal data to set prices based on what a company believes an individual consumer is willing to spend. The statement warns that undisclosed collection or use of personal data for personalized pricing could violate the FTC Act's prohibition on unfair or deceptive practices. The Commission voted 2-0 to authorize the Federal Register notice.
$4.0M
The FTC and Connecticut secured a $4 million settlement with Chase Nissan LLC (doing business as Manchester City Nissan) over allegations the dealership charged consumers unauthorized fees, including double-charging for 'certified pre-owned' vehicles and inserting charges like total loss protection into financing agreements without consent. The settlement requires $4 million in consumer redress, prohibits misrepresentations about vehicle certification and warranties, mandates prominent disclosure of the maximum total vehicle price, and requires express informed consent for all charges.
The FTC filed a complaint against Credit Glory LLC and related entities for deceptive credit repair practices, including false promises, impersonating debt collectors, charging illegal upfront fees, and using negative option billing without consent. A federal court temporarily halted the operation.
The FTC issued a policy statement abandoning disparate-impact liability, stating it will no longer bring claims based on this theory. It also modified compliance obligations for several companies based on past decisions.
The FTC, along with Utah and California, filed a complaint against Hims & Hers alleging the telehealth provider shared consumers' sensitive health information with third-party advertising platforms without consent, and deceived consumers about billing and cancellation practices. The complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act and the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act.