New: a trial court in 1 of every 10 U.S. counties. Read the post
Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementHigh Risk

FTC Walmart Wire-Transfer Fraud Settlement and Consumer Refunds

Walmart Inc.June 10, 2025Federal Trade Commission

Penalty Amount

$10,000,000

Consumers Affected

65,022

Summary

The FTC is distributing more than $9.8 million in refunds to consumers harmed by scammers who used Walmart’s wire-transfer services. The refunds stem from Walmart’s June 2025 settlement over allegations that it failed to implement effective anti-fraud policies, train employees properly, and warn customers about money-transfer fraud.

Remedy

Walmart settled FTC charges for $10 million, with more than $9.8 million being sent to affected consumers. The settlement also requires Walmart to take appropriate actions to effectively detect and prevent fraud-induced money transfers.

Monetary PenaltyConsumer RefundsCompliance Program

Contract Impact

Review vendor and payment-services agreements for clear obligations to monitor transactions, detect and prevent fraud-induced transfers, escalate suspicious activity, and maintain effective anti-fraud policies and procedures. Check training and customer-notice clauses to ensure personnel are trained to identify scams and customers receive timely fraud warnings. Customer terms should accurately describe fraud-prevention and reporting processes, while vendor contracts should allocate responsibility for investigations, consumer refunds, records, and cooperation with regulators.

Contract Search Terms

wire transfer fraud monitoringanti-fraud policies and procedurestransaction monitoring obligationsemployee fraud-prevention trainingcustomer fraud warningsfraud-induced transfer preventionconsumer redress and refund obligationspayment service provider responsibilities

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Walmart Inc.

Industry

Retail

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Walmart’s alleged failure to stop scammers"
Fine Amount
"Walmart to Pay $10 Million to Settle FTC Allegations it Allowed Scammers to Obtain Millions from Consumers Using Company’s Wire Transfer Services"
Violation Types
"the company failed to implement effective anti-fraud policies and procedures, did not properly train its employees and failed to warn customers about potential fraud related to money transfers"
Consumers Affected
"The FTC is sending checks to 65,022 affected consumers."
Remedy Summary
"Under the settlement terms, Walmart is required to take appropriate actions to effectively detect and prevent fraud-induced money transfers."

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

REPS & Company Inc.

The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.

FTC

Digital Forensics Corporation LLC

The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.

FTC

Greenway Auto Group

The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.

FTC

24 healthcare services companies (not individually named)

The FTC sent warning letters to 24 large healthcare services companies, cautioning that incomplete, inaccurate, or untimely pricing information for scheduled medical care may be unfair or deceptive. The letters urge recipients to review their price-disclosure practices and take corrective action; they announce no fine or formal order.

FTC

Premier Franchising Group LLC and Franchise Fastlane LLC

$1.9M

The FTC alleged that Premier Franchising Group LLC and Franchise Fastlane LLC made deceptive and unsubstantiated claims about the Premier Martial Arts franchise opportunity and violated the Franchise Rule. The proposed settlements require the companies to pay a combined $1.85 million to compensate franchisees, prohibit certain misrepresentations, and require Franchise Rule compliance; certain franchisees may also cancel their agreements without penalty.

FTC

Lens.com Inc.

The FTC, Utah, and Nevada sued Lens.com Inc., alleging that it advertised artificially low contact lens prices while hiding mandatory checkout charges and misleading consumers about its AutoRefill subscription. The complaint seeks to stop the alleged practices; the court has not yet decided the case, and no penalty or remedy has been imposed.