The FTC finalized an order against data broker X-Mode and its successor Outlogic for selling precise location data that could track visits to sensitive locations like medical clinics and places of worship. The order bans them from sharing or selling sensitive location data and requires them to delete collected data, implement privacy programs, and ensure downstream compliance.
The order prohibits X-Mode/Outlogic from selling or sharing sensitive location data, requires deletion of previously collected location data unless consensual or deidentified, mandates creation of a sensitive locations list, implements a supplier assessment program, sets procedures for data recipients to avoid misuse, and establishes a comprehensive privacy program with a data retention schedule.
In-house legal teams should review all vendor, customer, and data processing agreements where location data is shared, sold, or processed. Focus on clauses governing data sharing, consent mechanisms (especially for sensitive locations like medical clinics or places of worship), data retention and deletion obligations, breach notification, and downstream use restrictions. Contracts may need amendments to explicitly prohibit the sale or sharing of sensitive location data, require deletion of previously collected location data, mandate the implementation of privacy programs, and include audit rights or indemnification to ensure downstream recipients comply with restrictions on sensitive location data.
Entity
X-Mode Social and Outlogic
Also known as: X-Mode
Industry
Data BrokerOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/04/ftc-finalizes-order-x-mode-successor-outlogic-prohibiting-it-sharing-or-selling-sensitive-location
X ModeSocialComplaint
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/X-ModeSocialComplaint.pdf
X ModeSocialDecisionandOrder
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/X-ModeSocialDecisionandOrder.pdf
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"X-Mode and its successor Outlogic"
"sold precise location data that could be used to track people’s visits to sensitive locations such as medical and reproductive health clinics and places of worship."
$750K
The FTC finalized an order against Vanilla Chip LLC (doing business as TruHeight) and its principals for deceptively advertising height-enhancing supplements for children and teens without scientific evidence. The company also used fake reviews and incentivized 5-star ratings. The order requires a $750,000 payment and prohibits false health claims and deceptive review practices.
$2.3M
The FTC alleged that RentGrow, a tenant screening company, violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by failing to use reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy of its reports, including by reporting duplicate records and failing to disclose data sources. RentGrow agreed to pay a $2.25 million penalty and is prohibited from further FCRA violations and from misrepresenting dispute outcomes.
The FTC and New York Attorney General took action against Handy Technologies for deceptive earnings claims and failure to disclose fees and fines that led to millions of dollars being withheld from workers' wages. The FTC is sending over $2.7 million in refunds to 62,893 affected consumers.
$35.0M
The FTC alleged that Hopper, a travel booking app, charged consumers hidden and pre-selected fees (Tip and VIP Support) without their consent, misrepresented the benefits of VIP Support and Price Freeze services, and failed to clearly disclose total prices. Hopper agreed to pay $35 million for consumer redress and is prohibited from misrepresenting fees under a proposed order.
$1.5M
The FTC finalized a settlement with Publishing.com LLC and its principals for misleading consumers about potential earnings from self-publishing products. The company will pay $1.5 million and is prohibited from making unsubstantiated earnings claims, failing to disclose refund terms, and misrepresenting endorsements and reviews.
The FTC is seeking public comment on a proposed policy statement addressing concerns that AI companies may be manipulating AI system outputs contrary to consumer expectations for objectivity and accuracy. The statement explains that such conduct could be considered deceptive under Section 5 of the FTC Act. The public comment period runs until July 31, 2026.