Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementHigh RiskMultistate

LabCorp Multistate Settlement Over 2019 Vendor Data Breach

Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LabCorp)September 24, 2026New Jersey Attorney General

Penalty Amount

$2,287,455

Consumers Affected

10,200,000

Summary

Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings agreed to pay $2,287,455 to participating states and strengthen its security and vendor-management practices following an investigation into the 2019 breach at its debt-collection vendor, AMCA. The breach potentially exposed information of more than 27.5 million people nationwide, including sensitive information belonging to approximately 10.2 million LabCorp patients.

Remedy

LabCorp must pay $2,287,455 to participating states and strengthen its information-security and vendor-risk management programs. Requirements include minimizing data shared with vendors, expanding vendor assessments and verification, imposing cybersecurity and audit obligations on debt collectors through contracts, planning for vendor security incidents, and hiring an independent assessor to evaluate vendor-risk management.

Monetary PenaltyCompliance ProgramAudit Requirement

Contract Impact

Review vendor and business associate agreements, especially those with debt collectors and other service providers handling patient or other sensitive information. Confirm data-processing clauses limit shared data to what is necessary; require security controls, data segmentation, risk assessments, audits, and documented compliance verification; and mandate prompt reporting of vendor security events to support internal incident response. Add clear remediation and termination rights for security failures, and ensure customer-facing privacy notices and related agreements accurately describe vendor data sharing and safeguards.

Contract Search Terms

vendor information-security requirementsvendor risk assessment and monitoringdata minimization and sharing limitsincident-response and vendor-event reportingcybersecurity standards in vendor contractsvendor audit and compliance verification rightsdata segmentation requirementsvendor termination for security noncomplianceindependent security assessment

Laws Cited

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LabCorp)

Industry

Healthcare

Multistate Coalition

AlaskaAlabamaArizonaArkansasColoradoDistrict of ColumbiaDelawareFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMissouriNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsin

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"LabCorp will pay $2,287,455 to the participating states"
Fine Amount
"LabCorp will pay $2,287,455 to the participating states, including $68,000 to New Jersey."
Laws Cited
"entities covered by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act"
Violation Types
"The breach occurred at Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, doing business as American Medical Collection Agency (AMCA), a third-party vendor LabCorp used to collect medical debts."
Violation Types
"The compromised information included sensitive data belonging to approximately 10.2 million LabCorp patients, including 417,308 in New Jersey."

Related Enforcement Actions

NJ

Perry Johnson & Associates, Inc.; Perry Johnson, Inc.; Perry Johnson & Associates Coding, Inc.; Perry Johnson & Associates Radiology, Inc.; and Medical Transcription and Coding, Inc.

$10.0M

A March 2023 breach at the Perry Johnson companies exposed personal and protected health information belonging to more than 13.3 million people. The companies agreed to pay at least $300,000 in penalties, with an additional $9.7 million payable if they fail to meet the agreement, and to implement security, incident-response, and data-handling reforms.

NJ

General Motors, Inc.

$220.0M

A 36-attorney-general coalition resolved allegations that General Motors collected and sold identifiable driver behavior and location data to data brokers, which supplied it to insurers for use in assessing drivers and potentially raising premiums. The $220 million nationwide settlement requires affirmative express consent before collecting or disclosing driving and location data, limits data collection, and imposes privacy-program assessments and dealership oversight and training.

NJ

Dollar General Corporation

New Jersey, the FTC, and a coalition of 19 other states sued Dollar General, alleging that customers were repeatedly charged more at checkout than prices displayed on shelves, tags, and advertisements. The complaint alleges deceptive pricing practices and inadequate safeguards despite consumer complaints; the release does not describe a settlement, penalty, or other remedy imposed.

NJ

Character Technologies, Inc.

New Jersey joined a coalition of state attorneys general in filing a notice in Character Technologies, Inc.’s bankruptcy proceedings, raising concerns about the company’s safety and privacy practices and the sensitive conversations it holds, including those involving children and mental health. The states seek safeguards for consumers’ personal information in any sale or transfer of the company’s business or assets; the release does not report a fine or final finding of violations.

NJ

Trump Administration

A multistate coalition co-led by New Jersey won a federal court order rejecting the Trump Administration’s decision not to request funding for the CFPB. The order struck down that decision and directed the Administration to follow the law and fund the agency; no monetary penalty or privacy violation is described.

NJ

Mitragynine pseudoindoxyl, MGM-15, and MGM-16

New Jersey’s Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs alerted the public that three synthetic kratom-related compounds became illegal to possess or sell in the state under a temporary federal scheduling order. The release describes a controlled-substance alert, not a privacy enforcement action, and identifies no company, privacy violation, or monetary penalty.