Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Consent DecreeMedium Risk

NJ AG: Match Group, Inc. to Pay $650,000 and Change Disclosures to Resolve Allegations It Misrepresented Criminal-Background Screening Policies

Match Group, Inc.September 1, 2026New Jersey Attorney General

Penalty Amount

$650,000

Summary

The New Jersey Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs announced that Match Group, Inc. will pay $650,000 and change its business practices to settle allegations that it misrepresented or failed to disclose its criminal background screening policies and practices to New Jersey users, violating the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and the Internet Dating Safety Act. Under a Consent Order, Match must accurately represent its screening policies, notify existing New Jersey members of updated disclosures within 150 days, and post clear and conspicuous disclosures and safety notifications about the limitations of criminal background screenings.

Remedy

MGI will pay $650,000 to the State. Under the Consent Order, MGI must comply with the CFA by accurately representing to New Jersey members the criminal background screening policies and practices of its affiliates. Within 150 days of the filing of the Order, MGI Affiliates that perform criminal background screenings must send an email or issue a pop-up notification to all existing New Jersey members informing them of updates to the screening disclosure. Those affiliates must clearly and conspicuously disclose, in bold letters and at least 12-point type: the means and methods used to conduct screenings; whether and how often screening information is updated; whether members identified as having convictions (including registrable sex offenders) may access the service; and what crimes disqualify a member. Affiliates must also include safety notifications on their sites regarding the limitations of criminal background screenings, including that screenings are not foolproof, criminals may circumvent search technology, not all records are public or up to date, only publicly available convictions are included, and foreign convictions are not covered.

Monetary PenaltyConsent DecreeInjunctionCorrective Notice

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams—particularly at dating, social networking, and marketplace platforms—should review user-facing terms of service, safety disclosures, and marketing materials for accuracy of any representations about criminal background screening, member verification, or safety measures, since misrepresenting or failing to disclose such policies triggered consumer fraud liability here. Vendor agreements with third-party background-check and screening providers should be checked for data accuracy warranties, commitments on how often screening data is updated, coverage limitations (e.g., public records only, foreign convictions excluded), and indemnification for inaccurate results. Companies operating multiple brands or affiliate platforms should ensure their intercompany and platform agreements require consistent, compliant disclosures across all properties, and should build user-notification obligations into their policies so that when screening practices change, existing members are notified within a defined timeframe (here, 150 days).

Contract Search Terms

criminal background screeningbackground check disclosureInternet Dating Safety Actsafety notificationscreening policy disclosuremember notificationNew Jersey Consumer Fraud Actdeceptive representationuser safety representationsterms of service disclosure

Laws Cited

New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act (CFA)Internet Dating Safety Act (IDSA)NJ Division of Consumer Affairs regulations related to internet dating services

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Match Group, Inc.

Industry

Social Media

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Match Group, Inc."
Fine Amount
"will pay $650,000"
Laws Cited
"New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act"
Laws Cited
"Internet Dating Safety Act"
Violation Types
"misrepresenting or failing to disclose its criminal background screening policies and practices to its New Jersey users"
Event Date
"For Immediate Release: September 1, 2026"

Related Enforcement Actions

NJ

Amazon

On August 31, 2026, New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport and the Division of Consumer Affairs joined the FTC and a bipartisan coalition of 21 other states in suing Amazon, alleging that for over seven years the company secretly rigged its advertising auctions—converting advertised 'second price' auctions into first-price auctions with hidden 'soft reserve price' surcharges—overcharging more than 500,000 small- and medium-sized businesses and extracting tens of billions of dollars. The complaint alleges Amazon actively concealed the surcharges, gave false and misleading answers to advertisers who asked directly about the auction format, and applied inflated upcharges on high-volume shopping days like Prime Day and Black Friday. The lawsuit was just filed; no penalties or remedies have been imposed yet.

NJ

Meta Platforms, Inc.

A bipartisan coalition of state attorneys general led by New Jersey, California, Colorado, and Kentucky is taking Meta Platforms, Inc. to trial, alleging that Meta designed addictive features on Instagram and Facebook that harm minors' mental health, illegally collected data from children under 13 without the required protections under COPPA, and misled users about platform safety. Opening arguments begin August 18, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. No monetary penalty or final remedy has yet been imposed.

NJ

U.S. Department of Transportation

A coalition of 21 state attorneys general and Pennsylvania filed lawsuits against the Trump Administration, DOT, FMCSA, DHS, and AAMVA to prevent the unlawful demand for a database containing personal information of 17 million commercial driver's license holders. The lawsuits allege violations of federal privacy laws and the Administrative Procedure Act, and seek an emergency order to block the data transfer.

NJ

Opportunity Financials, LLC

Attorney General Jennifer Davenport joined a coalition of 17 attorneys general in sending comment letters to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve Board, urging them to deny OppFi's application to acquire BNC National Bank and obtain a national bank charter. The coalition argues that the charter would allow OppFi to circumvent state usury laws and offer high-cost loans with APRs up to 200%, harming consumers.

NJ

Sandoz Inc.

$400.0M

Attorney General Jennifer Davenport joined a coalition of 43 states and territories in announcing a $400 million settlement in principle with Sandoz Inc. to resolve allegations of widespread price-fixing and anticompetitive conduct in the generic drug market. Sandoz will pay approximately $469 million total including prior settlements, and has agreed to internal reforms to ensure fair competition.

NJ

New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs

Press release announcing that Governor Mikie Sherrill will nominate consumer protection expert Christopher L. Peterson to serve as Director of the New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs. Peterson is a former senior CFPB official and legal scholar. No enforcement action or privacy violation is described.