Court Rules
All enforcement actions
InvestigationLow Risk

Texas AG Investigates Lone Star Pups for Deceptive Puppy Sales

Lone Star Pups, LLCJuly 29, 2026Texas Attorney General

Summary

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton opened an investigation into Lone Star Pups, LLC for misleading consumers about the origin and veterinary care of puppies sold online. The company allegedly misrepresents breeder certifications and a '10 Year Health Guarantee' with restrictive fine print. The investigation focuses on potential violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review vendor agreements with breeders and veterinary providers to ensure representations about care and certifications are accurate and not misleading. Additionally, review customer-facing warranty and guarantee clauses to ensure fine print does not contradict marketing promises. Specifically, examine clauses related to health guarantees, warranty duration, conditions for coverage, and any requirements for consumers to maintain insurance.

Contract Search Terms

health guaranteewarranty fine printveterinary care standardsbreeder certificationOFA certificationdeceptive advertisingpet insurance requirementorigin disclosureguarantee duration

Laws Cited

Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Lone Star Pups, LLC

Industry

Other

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Lone Star Pups, LLC"
Laws Cited
"Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act"
Summary
"misleading Texas consumers about the origin and veterinary care of the puppies it sells"
Summary
"false promises behind fine print"

Related Enforcement Actions

TX

Open AI Global, LLC

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued Open AI Global, LLC and affiliated entities, alleging that ChatGPT was marketed as safe and reliable without disclosing risks of inaccurate or harmful outputs. The suit also alleges harms to minors and collection of their data without parental oversight; the release states no monetary penalty or specific remedy imposed.

TX

Lululemon USA Inc.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton secured an Assurance of Voluntary Compliance with Lululemon USA Inc. after investigating potential PFAS and consumer representations about product safety. The agreement requires the company to maintain supply-chain chemical standards, verify vendor compliance through testing or certifications, and take corrective action for three years; no monetary penalty is stated.

TX

PDD Holdings, Inc. and WhaleCo Inc. (doing business as Temu)

$3.0M

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced a settlement requiring Temu to protect Texans’ sensitive personal data from exposure to the Chinese Communist Party and to strengthen product-safety practices. Temu must pay Texas $3 million, comply with data-security requirements backed by a potential $8 million annual penalty, conduct annual independent product testing, and take specified action on products found to contain harmful substances.

TX

Albertsons Companies, Inc.

$773.0M

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced that a multistate coalition had secured an opioid settlement with Albertsons, which would require the grocery chain to pay more than $773 million nationally once final. Texas and its political subdivisions may receive up to $57.8 million for opioid abatement; the release does not identify privacy violations.

TX

Gerber Products Company and Nestlé USA, Inc.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued Gerber Products Company and Nestlé USA, Inc., alleging that Gerber made deceptive safety and testing claims while its baby food contained dangerous levels of toxic heavy metals. The lawsuit asserts claims under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act; the release does not report a settlement, monetary penalty, or court order.

TX

Rubinsky Roofing LLC

$1.5M

The Texas Attorney General obtained a judgment holding Rubinsky Roofing LLC liable for 27 violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, including deceptive practices involving older consumers and payment for unnecessary or unfinished repairs. The judgment requires more than $1.5 million in civil penalties, allocates at least $500,000 to consumer restitution, and permanently bars the company and its owner from the practices at issue.