Court Rules
All enforcement actions
InvestigationLow Risk

TX AG Investigates Superior Insurance for Illegal Surveillance and Blackmail

Superior InsuranceMarch 27, 2025Texas Attorney General

Summary

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has opened an investigation into Superior Insurance for allegedly using private investigators to spy on lawmakers, journalists, and private citizens with pending insurance claims. The company's CEO admitted to these actions at a legislative hearing, citing concerns about blackmail and leveraging information to secure state contracts and avoid paying legitimate claims, particularly for medical bills.

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review vendor agreements with private investigators for surveillance prohibitions, customer insurance policies for claims handling and data sharing clauses, and state contracts for compliance terms. Specific clauses to examine include data sharing restrictions, surveillance provisions, claims handling procedures, whistleblower protections, and ethics compliance terms. Changes might involve adding explicit bans on illegal surveillance, requiring transparency in third-party investigations, and enhancing oversight to prevent claim denials and blackmail.

Contract Search Terms

Surveillance clauseThird-party investigator useClaims handling proceduresData sharing restrictionsWhistleblower protectionEthics compliance addendumState contract complianceMedical records accessProhibited surveillance practices

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Superior Insurance

Industry

Insurance

Official Sources

Related Enforcement Actions

TX

Open AI Global, LLC

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued Open AI Global, LLC and affiliated entities, alleging that ChatGPT was marketed as safe and reliable without disclosing risks of inaccurate or harmful outputs. The suit also alleges harms to minors and collection of their data without parental oversight; the release states no monetary penalty or specific remedy imposed.

TX

Lululemon USA Inc.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton secured an Assurance of Voluntary Compliance with Lululemon USA Inc. after investigating potential PFAS and consumer representations about product safety. The agreement requires the company to maintain supply-chain chemical standards, verify vendor compliance through testing or certifications, and take corrective action for three years; no monetary penalty is stated.

TX

PDD Holdings, Inc. and WhaleCo Inc. (doing business as Temu)

$3.0M

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced a settlement requiring Temu to protect Texans’ sensitive personal data from exposure to the Chinese Communist Party and to strengthen product-safety practices. Temu must pay Texas $3 million, comply with data-security requirements backed by a potential $8 million annual penalty, conduct annual independent product testing, and take specified action on products found to contain harmful substances.

TX

Albertsons Companies, Inc.

$773.0M

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced that a multistate coalition had secured an opioid settlement with Albertsons, which would require the grocery chain to pay more than $773 million nationally once final. Texas and its political subdivisions may receive up to $57.8 million for opioid abatement; the release does not identify privacy violations.

TX

Gerber Products Company and Nestlé USA, Inc.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued Gerber Products Company and Nestlé USA, Inc., alleging that Gerber made deceptive safety and testing claims while its baby food contained dangerous levels of toxic heavy metals. The lawsuit asserts claims under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act; the release does not report a settlement, monetary penalty, or court order.

TX

Rubinsky Roofing LLC

$1.5M

The Texas Attorney General obtained a judgment holding Rubinsky Roofing LLC liable for 27 violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, including deceptive practices involving older consumers and payment for unnecessary or unfinished repairs. The judgment requires more than $1.5 million in civil penalties, allocates at least $500,000 to consumer restitution, and permanently bars the company and its owner from the practices at issue.