Court Rules
All enforcement actions
CoalitionLow RiskMultistate

Virginia AG Joins Coalition Opposing Proposed H-1B Visa Tax

U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)September 25, 2026Virginia Attorney General

Summary

Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones joined 22 attorneys general in a comment letter opposing a proposed USCIS rule that would impose a $103,265 tax on certain H-1B petitions. The coalition urged USCIS to withdraw the proposal, arguing it exceeds the agency’s authority, harms state staffing, and violates rulemaking requirements.

Contract Impact

This is not a privacy enforcement action, but employers should review vendor and customer agreements covering recruiting, staffing, and H-1B sponsorship. Check clauses allocating immigration petition costs and government fees, reimbursement or pass-through charges, responsibility for filings by staffing subcontractors, and change-in-law mechanisms in case the proposed fee or related requirements change. Employee offer and immigration-support documents should also clearly state which party is responsible for sponsorship and associated costs.

Contract Search Terms

H-1B petition fee allocationimmigration filing fee reimbursementvisa sponsorship responsibilitystaffing vendor pass-through chargeschange-in-law clausegovernment fee adjustmentsubcontractor staffing compliance

Laws Cited

Immigration and Nationality ActAdministrative Procedure Act

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)

Industry

Other

Multistate Coalition

California Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Attorney GeneralArizona Attorney GeneralColorado Attorney GeneralConnecticut Attorney GeneralDelaware Attorney GeneralDistrict of ColumbiaHawaii Attorney GeneralIllinois Attorney GeneralMaine Attorney GeneralMaryland Attorney GeneralMichigan Attorney GeneralMinnesota Attorney GeneralNevada Attorney GeneralNew Jersey Attorney GeneralNew Mexico Attorney GeneralNew York Attorney GeneralNorth Carolina Attorney GeneralOregon Attorney GeneralWashington Attorney GeneralWisconsin Attorney General

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)"
Event Date
"Published on:** September 25, 2026"
Fine Amount
"would impose a tax of $103,265 on non-cap-exempt employers"
Laws Cited
"under the Immigration and Nationality Act"
Laws Cited
"violates the Administrative Procedure Act"
Violation description
"The proposed rule exceeds USCIS’s legal authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act."

Related Enforcement Actions

VA

U.S. Department of Justice

A multistate coalition led in part by Virginia obtained a court ruling blocking the federal government from conditioning public safety grants on states’ acceptance of immigration-enforcement demands. The court declared the conditions unlawful and permanently enjoined their implementation or enforcement; the release reports no monetary penalty.

VA

Coalition of 45 attorneys general

Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones joined a bipartisan coalition of 45 attorneys general urging Congress to pass the Senate version of the Kids Online Safety Act. This is a legislative advocacy announcement, not an enforcement action; it references a separate $17 billion multistate settlement with Meta but does not provide its settlement date or impose a penalty in this announcement.

VA

U.S. Census Bureau

Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones joined a multistate coalition submitting a comment letter opposing proposed changes to the 2030 Census. The release describes a policy challenge, not a privacy enforcement action, and reports no fine or enforcement remedy.

VA

Trump Administration

Virginia’s Attorney General joined a multistate lawsuit challenging a federal Medicaid rule that made it harder for medically vulnerable people to qualify for exemptions from work requirements. The court found the definition of medical frailty unlawful, vacated that language, and issued a permanent injunction; the release does not state the court decision’s date, so the release date is used as a proxy.

VA

General Motors

$220.0M

General Motors agreed to a $220 million settlement with a coalition of 36 attorneys general over allegations that it sold consumers’ driver behavior and location data to third parties, including data brokers that resold it to insurers. The settlement reportedly requires consumer consent before collecting or disclosing driving and location data, and Virginia is to receive about $6.5 million.

VA

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)

Virginia joined a multistate lawsuit challenging a FinCEN rule that exempts nearly all businesses from beneficial-ownership reporting and the agency’s plan to delete ownership information already collected. The states allege violations of the Corporate Transparency Act and Administrative Procedure Act and seek to have the rule set aside and the ownership database maintained; no court outcome or monetary penalty is reported.