Rule 10.762. Cross-assignments for court interpreter employees
Cal. Rules of Court, rule 10.762
Current text effective January 1, 2016.
#(a) Purpose
This rule implements a process for cross-assignment of a court interpreter employed by a superior court under Government Code section 71810(b).
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007.)
#(b) Definitions
As used in this rule:
#(1) "Home court" means the superior court in which the court interpreter is an employee. An employee's home court includes all locations of a superior court within a county.
#(2) "Away court" means the superior court to which the court interpreter is temporarily cross-assigned.
#(3) "Cross-assignment" means any assignment to perform spoken language interpretation for a superior court other than the interpreter's home court.
#(4) "Regional court interpreter coordinator" means a Judicial Council employee whose duty it is to locate, assign, and schedule available court interpreter employees for courts within and across regions, which are described under Government Code section 71807(a).
#(5) "Local court interpreter coordinator" means an employee of a superior court whose duty it is to locate, assign, and schedule available court interpreter employees for his or her court.
(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2016; previously amended effective January 1, 2007.)
#(c) Procedure for cross-assignments
#(1) Under Government Code section 71804.5(b) a court interpreter employed by a superior court is not permitted to be an employee of more than one superior court. A court interpreter employed by a superior court may not contract with another court, but may accept appointments to provide services to more than one court through cross-assignments.
#(2) A superior court may attempt to fill an interpreting assignment with the employee of another court before hiring an independent contract court interpreter.
#(3) If a superior court wants to fill an interpreting assignment with the employee of another court, the court must notify the regional court interpreter coordinator to locate an employee of a court within or across regions.
#(4) Each local court interpreter coordinator must provide the schedule of each court interpreter employee available for cross-assignment to the regional court interpreter coordinator.
#(5) A superior court may adopt additional internal procedures for cross-assigning a court interpreter employee that are not inconsistent with Government Code section 71810 and this rule.
#(6) A Regional Court Interpreter Employment Relations Committee may approve alternative procedures for cross-assigning a court interpreter employee that permit the interpreter to directly arrange cross-assignments with an "away" court, provided that the procedures require notice to the regional coordinator.
(Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2007.)
#(d) Payment for cross-assignments
The home court must issue payment to the court interpreter for all cross-assignments, including per diem compensation and mileage reimbursement. Judicial Council staff will administer funding to the home court for payments associated with cross-assignments.
(Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2016; previously amended effective January 1, 2007.)
#(e) Duties of a court interpreter on cross-assignment
A court interpreter who accepts a cross-assignment is responsible for following the personnel rules of the home court while performing services for the away court.
#(f) Superior courts of Ventura and Solano Counties
The superior courts of Ventura and Solano Counties may participate in the procedure for cross-assignments as follows:
#(1) The Superior Court of Ventura County may accept or provide interpreters on cross-assignment under the procedures established in Region 1, as defined by Government Code section 71807.
#(2) The Superior Court of Solano County may accept or provide interpreters on cross-assignment under the procedures established in Region 2, as defined by Government Code section 71807.
(Subd (f) amended effective January 1, 2007.)
Chapter 7 adopted effective January 1, 2008.
#History
Rule 10.762 amended effective January 1, 2016; adopted as rule 6.662 effective March 1, 2003; previously amended and renumbered as rule 10.762 effective January 1, 2007.
What this rule requires
Chambers Communication Rules
If a superior court wants to fill an interpreting assignment with the employee of another court, the court must notify the regional court interpreter coordinator to locate an employee of a court within or across regions.
Each local court interpreter coordinator must provide the schedule of each court interpreter employee available for cross-assignment to the regional court interpreter coordinator.
A Regional Court Interpreter Employment Relations Committee may approve alternative procedures for cross-assigning a court interpreter employee that permit the interpreter to directly arrange cross-assignments with an "away" court, provided that the procedures require notice to the regional coordinator.
Official text: courts.ca.gov , checked October 19, 2026.