Penalty Amount
$60,000,000
Colorado and other states reached a settlement with Family Dollar after finding that customers were charged more at checkout than prices advertised or shown on shelves. The settlement calls for consumer restitution and discounts, a Colorado payment, and requirements for pricing controls, assessments, reporting, and consumer notices.
Family Dollar must pay $43 million in restitution to eligible consumers, fund a $20 million discount program, and pay Colorado $87,989. It must implement a comprehensive price accuracy system, obtain annual third-party assessments, annually certify compliance in reports to states, report price discrepancies, and post information about how consumers can file claims.
Review retail vendor, point-of-sale, pricing-data, and promotions agreements for clear responsibility for keeping shelf, website, app, and register prices consistent and for accurately applying discounts and advertised offers. Add or strengthen audit rights, price-accuracy testing, recordkeeping, incident escalation and reporting, and obligations to correct discrepancies promptly; ensure indemnity and remediation provisions allocate responsibility for consumer claims, restitution, and discount programs. Customer-facing terms and notices should also describe claim procedures clearly. This action concerns pricing practices, not a privacy violation.
Entity
Family Dollar Stores, LLC
Industry
RetailOfficial Press Release
https://coag.gov/press-releases/ag-weiser-secures-60-million-multistate-settlement-with-family-dollar-for-overcharging-customers/
Family Dollar Order
https://coag.gov/app/uploads/2026/11/Family-Dollar-Order.pdf
ECF1 Complaint
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/ECF1-Complaint.pdf
Colorado Attorney General Enforcement Page
https://coag.gov/
"settlement with Family Dollar"
"$60 million multistate settlement"
"charged consumers more for products at the register than prices listed on shelves and in advertisements."
"pay back $43 million in restitution to eligible consumers across the country"
"Pay $87,989 to the state of Colorado."
"Nov. 12, 2026"
$183.5M
Colorado and other states settled allegations that Acima deceptively advertised rent-to-own agreements, concealed markups and fees, and automatically placed consumers into more expensive 12-month payment plans. The settlement requires changes to Acima’s practices and provides lease forgiveness and restitution to Colorado consumers, as well as payment to the state.
$130K
Colorado settled allegations that Urban Talent Management and Style Incorporated used unfair paid-training contracts and lending practices, including unlawful contract terms, excessive fees, and inadequate lending disclosures. The companies agreed to stop offering paid training in Colorado, notify affected consumers, halt collection on specified accounts and debt, pay $10,000 in investigation costs, and accept a $120,000 suspended penalty conditioned on compliance.
$48.5M
A multistate investigation found that Progress Residential misled renters through false rental-price advertising and hidden fees, and failed to properly inspect or repair homes and address serious maintenance and billing concerns. The settlement requires clearer fee disclosures and bars improper fees, among other requirements, and requires the company to pay $48.5 million to the FTC and the states.
$220.0M
General Motors agreed to a nationwide $220 million settlement over allegations that it sold drivers’ identifiable driving behavior and location data to data brokers, which then sold it to insurers. The settlement requires affirmative express consent before collecting or disclosing driving and location data, limits data collection, and imposes privacy-program assessments and dealership oversight and training.
Colorado, the FTC, and a bipartisan group of state attorneys general sued Toast, alleging misleading claims about its subscription services and financial products, undisclosed fees, and obstacles to cancelling subscriptions. The coalition is asking the court for an injunction, monetary relief, civil penalties, and other relief; the press release does not report an imposed penalty.
Colorado joined a 21-attorney-general coalition suing to challenge a FinCEN rule that exempts nearly all businesses from Corporate Transparency Act ownership-reporting requirements, as well as plans to delete existing ownership records. The coalition alleges violations of the Corporate Transparency Act and Administrative Procedure Act and asks the court to invalidate the rule and require FinCEN to continue collecting and maintaining the records.