Court Rules
All enforcement actions
New LawLow Risk

CT AG Tong Proposes Legislation to Curb Youth Social Media Addiction

Social Media CompaniesFebruary 10, 2025Connecticut Attorney General

Summary

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced proposed legislation to protect minors from addictive social media features. The bill would prohibit exposing minors to harmful algorithms without parental consent, set default usage limits and notification restrictions, and require annual reporting by social media companies. This follows ongoing legal actions against Meta and TikTok for youth addiction concerns.

Remedy

The proposed legislation requires social media companies to implement default settings for account privacy, usage time limits (one hour per day), and notification bans between midnight and 6 a.m. Parental consent is required to alter defaults. Companies must annually report the number of minors on their platform, those with parental consent, and average usage time by age and time of day.

Compliance ProgramReporting Requirements

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review contracts with social media platforms or services that may be used by minors. Check for clauses regarding minor usage, parental consent mechanisms, algorithm design, usage time limits, and notification settings. Ensure contracts comply with emerging state laws on youth social media addiction and include provisions for data reporting and default protections.

Contract Search Terms

parental consentaddictive algorithmsdefault settingsusage limitsnotification restrictionsminor protectionsocial media regulationalgorithm transparencyyouth safetycompliance reporting

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Social Media Companies

Industry

Social Media

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"social media companies"
Violation Types
"exposing minors to harmful and addictive algorithms and notifications"

Related Enforcement Actions

CT

SunRun, Inc.

$500K

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced settlements with SunRun, Inc., Elevate Solar Solutions, and two salespeople over allegations of deceptive solar sales, including impersonating consumers and locking homeowners into long-term contracts without consent. SunRun must pay $300,000 and provide consumer relief; Elevate and the salespeople face a stated $200,000 penalty, with $100,000 suspended subject to ongoing compliance.

CT

Mylan

$8.0M

Connecticut announced an $8 million settlement with Mylan over allegations that it used agreements to delay generic EpiPen competitors and took other actions that inflated prices. Mylan also agreed to provide 10,000 free EpiPens; the release states that Mylan denies wrongdoing.

CT

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined a coalition of 22 attorneys general in filing an amicus brief challenging DHS’s policy and practice of conducting warrantless civil immigration arrests. The press release describes a court challenge, not a privacy enforcement action or monetary penalty.

CT

Frontier Communications Parent Inc.

$625K

Connecticut reached a $625,000 settlement with Frontier Communications Parent Inc. over an April 2024 breach in which compromised employee and vendor credentials were used to access internal systems and exfiltrate unencrypted personal information of 58,841 Connecticut residents. The settlement requires Frontier to strengthen its security program, implement specific safeguards and training, and obtain an independent third-party assessment.

CT

Boston Children’s Health Physicians and XTIUM

$2.6M

Connecticut and New York found that Boston Children’s Health Physicians and its security vendor, XTIUM, failed to use reasonable safeguards, resulting in hackers accessing sensitive personal, medical, and employee information. The companies agreed to pay penalties totaling $2.64 million and implement enhanced cybersecurity measures.

CT

Character Technologies, Inc.

Connecticut joined a coalition of state attorneys general filing a notice in Character Technologies, Inc.’s bankruptcy proceedings, raising concerns about the company’s safety and privacy practices and the sensitive information it holds. The states seek protections for children and consumers if the company’s business or assets are sold or transferred; the filing does not impose a fine or other remedy.