Penalty Amount
$700,000
CRI Genetics, LLC was charged by the FTC and California Attorney General for deceptive marketing of DNA testing services, including false accuracy claims, fake reviews, and using dark patterns in billing. The company agreed to a settlement, paying a $700,000 civil penalty, and is prohibited from deceptive practices, must obtain consent for data sharing, and allow data deletion for consumers who requested it.
CRI Genetics must pay a $700,000 civil penalty, cease all deceptive marketing practices, disclose total costs and charging practices, obtain explicit consent before sharing DNA information, and delete genetic data for consumers who received refunds and requested deletion.
In-house legal teams should review customer-facing agreements (terms of service, billing authorizations, and marketing materials) and vendor/data processor agreements. Key clauses to scrutinize include: 1) representations and warranties regarding product/service accuracy and performance claims; 2) provisions governing the use and authenticity of reviews, testimonials, and endorsements; 3) billing and payment terms, especially those involving automatic renewals, negative option marketing, or 'dark pattern' design elements that could mislead consumers; 4) data processing and sharing clauses, ensuring explicit, granular consent is obtained for sharing biometric/genetic data; and 5) consumer rights sections, guaranteeing a clear, accessible mechanism for data deletion requests. Agreements may need amendments to remove unsubstantiated accuracy claims, implement unambiguous consent mechanisms for data sharing, establish a compliant data deletion process, and redesign any billing interfaces or terms that employ deceptive patterns.
Entity
CRI Genetics, LLC
Also known as: CRI Genetics
Industry
HealthcareOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/11/ftc-california-obtain-order-against-dna-testing-firm-over-charges-it-made-myriad-misrepresentations
crigeneticscomplaint
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/crigeneticscomplaint.pdf
crigeneticsstipulatedorder
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/crigeneticsstipulatedorder.pdf
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"CRI Genetics, LLC (CRI)"
"$700,000 civil penalty"
"FTC Act"
"California’s Unfair Competition Law"
"False Advertising Law"
"used 'dark patterns' in its online billing process to trick consumers into paying for products they did not want and did not agree to buy"
$930K
The FTC finalized orders requiring CMG Media Corporation (doing business as Cox Media Group), MindSift LLC, and 1010 Digital Works LLC to pay a total of $930,000 for falsely claiming they offered an AI-powered service that could target ads based on conversations captured from consumers' smart devices, and that consumers had opted into such targeting. The orders also prohibit the companies from making misrepresentations about their advertising services, voice data collection, and consumer consent.
The FTC announced it is seeking public comment on a proposed enforcement policy statement regarding personalized pricing, which is the use of personal data to set prices based on what a company believes an individual consumer is willing to spend. The statement warns that undisclosed collection or use of personal data for personalized pricing could violate the FTC Act's prohibition on unfair or deceptive practices. The Commission voted 2-0 to authorize the Federal Register notice.
$4.0M
The FTC and Connecticut secured a $4 million settlement with Chase Nissan LLC (doing business as Manchester City Nissan) over allegations the dealership charged consumers unauthorized fees, including double-charging for 'certified pre-owned' vehicles and inserting charges like total loss protection into financing agreements without consent. The settlement requires $4 million in consumer redress, prohibits misrepresentations about vehicle certification and warranties, mandates prominent disclosure of the maximum total vehicle price, and requires express informed consent for all charges.
The FTC filed a complaint against Credit Glory LLC and related entities for deceptive credit repair practices, including false promises, impersonating debt collectors, charging illegal upfront fees, and using negative option billing without consent. A federal court temporarily halted the operation.
The FTC issued a policy statement abandoning disparate-impact liability, stating it will no longer bring claims based on this theory. It also modified compliance obligations for several companies based on past decisions.
The FTC, along with Utah and California, filed a complaint against Hims & Hers alleging the telehealth provider shared consumers' sensitive health information with third-party advertising platforms without consent, and deceived consumers about billing and cancellation practices. The complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act and the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act.