Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Enforcement ActionMedium Risk

FTC Alleges COPPA Violations by Disney in Children's Privacy Enforcement Action

Disney Worldwide ServicesSeptember 2, 2025Federal Trade Commission

Summary

The FTC released a statement by Chairman Ferguson, joined by Commissioners Holyoak and Meador, regarding the enforcement action against Disney Worldwide Services for alleged violations of the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). The statement addresses the case involving children's privacy protections.

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review all agreements involving the collection or use of data from children under 13, including customer-facing terms of service, privacy policies, vendor contracts (especially with ad-tech or analytics providers), and any data processing agreements. Focus on clauses governing consent mechanisms (ensuring they are verifiable and parental), data collection purposes, data sharing with third parties (particularly for advertising), data retention and deletion policies for minors' data, and advertising practices targeting children. Contracts may need amendments to explicitly incorporate COPPA requirements, restrict profiling of children, mandate clear parental consent flows, limit data retention to the necessary period, and prohibit unauthorized data sharing. Ensure all marketing, analytics, and platform agreements with services potentially accessed by children contain robust COPPA-compliant provisions.

Contract Search Terms

parental consentchildren's privacy policydata collection from minorsCOPPA compliance clauseage verificationdata retention for minorsthird-party data sharing with children's dataadvertising to childrenverifiable parental consentchildren's data processing addendum

Laws Cited

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Disney Worldwide Services

Also known as: Disney

Industry

Media & Entertainment

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Disney Worldwide Servs."
Laws Cited
"Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)"
Violation Types
"Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

GovAssist LLC, Entry LLC, and Scott Zuckerman

The FTC filed a complaint alleging that GovAssist LLC, Entry LLC, and Scott Zuckerman used deceptive paid search ads, misleading service and pricing claims, and fake reviews to deceive consumers seeking passport services. The complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act, the Impersonation Rule, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; the case will be decided by the court, and no penalty or remedy is reported as imposed.

FTC

Federal Trade Commission

The FTC issued its annual report to Congress describing fraud trends affecting older adults and the agency’s enforcement, education, and outreach efforts. The report is not a specific privacy enforcement action and announces no penalty or remedy.

FTC

REPS & Company Inc.

The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.

FTC

Accelerated Debt Settlement Inc.; ADS Resolve LLC; Financial Solutions Group LLC; Unified Capital Services LLC; Mediwerks; Resolution Specialists LLC; and Futura Capital

$106.8M

A federal court entered a $106.8 million default judgment against corporate defendants in an alleged debt-relief scheme that impersonated banks and government entities and targeted seniors and veterans. The judgment permanently bans the defendants from the debt-relief industry and imposes additional prohibitions, including on impersonation, telemarketing, and misrepresentations.

FTC

Digital Forensics Corporation LLC

The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.

FTC

Greenway Auto Group

The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.