Court Rules
All enforcement actions
GuidanceLow Risk

FTC Seeks Public Comment on Policy Statement Addressing AI Accuracy

Federal Trade CommissionJuly 1, 2026Federal Trade Commission

Summary

The FTC is seeking public comment on a proposed policy statement addressing concerns that AI companies may be manipulating AI system outputs contrary to consumer expectations for objectivity and accuracy. The statement explains that such conduct could be considered deceptive under Section 5 of the FTC Act. The public comment period runs until July 31, 2026.

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review vendor agreements related to AI systems, particularly clauses governing AI output accuracy, objectivity, and compliance with consumer protection laws. Contracts with AI developers and providers should include representations that AI outputs will not be manipulated for undisclosed ideological purposes. Additionally, teams should assess any state-specific AI law compliance obligations, such as those under the Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act, and ensure contracts address potential preemption by federal law. Customer-facing agreements may need updates to disclose any limitations on AI objectivity.

Contract Search Terms

AI accuracyAI output manipulationdeceptive AI practicesFTC Act Section 5ideological bias in AIstate AI laws preemptionColorado Artificial Intelligence Actconsumer expectations AI

Laws Cited

15 U.S.C. 45

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Federal Trade Commission

Industry

Other

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Federal Trade Commission"
Laws Cited
"Section 5 of the FTC Act"
Violation Types
"AI companies that distort their systems’ outputs to achieve undisclosed ideological objectives could be deceiving consumers"
Event Type
"proposed policy statement"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

Federal Trade Commission

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced it submitted a draft Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) regarding online food delivery service fees to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review on April 10, 2026. The ANPRM is classified as a 'significant regulatory action' under Executive Orders 12866 and 14215, requiring review by OIRA before public issuance. This press release does not describe an enforcement action against a private entity, nor any privacy-related violations or penalties.

FTC

Federal Trade Commission

On March 20, 2026, FTC Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson directed FTC staff to form a Healthcare Task Force to coordinate healthcare enforcement and advocacy efforts. The task force will focus on targeted enforcement initiatives, agencywide investigation strategies, amicus opportunities, and identifying emerging enforcement priorities. It will also seek partnerships with other federal agencies including HHS and DOJ to advance healthcare competition and consumer protection.

FTC

Federal Trade Commission

Attorney General William Tong of Connecticut led a bipartisan coalition of 30 state attorneys general in submitting comments to the Federal Trade Commission. The comments aim to improve collaboration between the FTC and state AGs to prevent and prosecute unfair and deceptive practices, addressing issues raised by the AMG Capital decision that may limit restitution. The coalition emphasizes the importance of joint efforts for national consumer protection.

FTC

Vanilla Chip LLC

$750K

The FTC finalized an order against Vanilla Chip LLC (doing business as TruHeight) and its principals for deceptively advertising height-enhancing supplements for children and teens without scientific evidence. The company also used fake reviews and incentivized 5-star ratings. The order requires a $750,000 payment and prohibits false health claims and deceptive review practices.

FTC

RentGrow Inc.

$2.3M

The FTC alleged that RentGrow, a tenant screening company, violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by failing to use reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy of its reports, including by reporting duplicate records and failing to disclose data sources. RentGrow agreed to pay a $2.25 million penalty and is prohibited from further FCRA violations and from misrepresenting dispute outcomes.

FTC

Handy Technologies

The FTC and New York Attorney General took action against Handy Technologies for deceptive earnings claims and failure to disclose fees and fines that led to millions of dollars being withheld from workers' wages. The FTC is sending over $2.7 million in refunds to 62,893 affected consumers.