Consumers Affected
443,048
The FTC is distributing over $10.9 million in refunds to 443,048 consumers harmed by Financial Education Services (FES), a credit repair pyramid scheme that defrauded consumers through false promises of credit score fixes and illegal pyramid recruitment. The refunds follow a 2024 settlement with FES and its owners that banned them from fraudulent practices and required turnover of funds for consumer restitution.
Settlement requires FES and its owners to permanently end fraudulent credit repair and pyramid scheme practices, turn over funds to provide $10.9 million in refunds to 443,048 affected consumers, and imposes permanent bans on the owners from operating credit repair or similar services.
In-house legal teams should review all vendor agreements with financial service providers, particularly credit repair, debt relief, or consumer finance vendors, to ensure they prohibit pyramid scheme structures, false advertising of service outcomes, and unauthorized recruitment of customers as independent salespeople. Contracts should include explicit refund and restitution clauses, termination rights for fraudulent conduct, and representations warranties against deceptive marketing practices. For agreements with individual owners or operators, include non-compete and ban provisions aligned with regulatory restrictions on future participation in similar industries.
Entity
Financial Education Services (FES) d/b/a United Wealth Education, United Credit Education Services, Youth Financial Literacy Foundation
Industry
Financial Services"a credit repair operation known by multiple names including Financial Education Services (FES), United Wealth Education, United Credit Education Services, and Youth Financial Literacy Foundation"
"The FTC secured settlements with FES and its owners and operators in 2024"
"443,048 affected customers"
"preyed on consumers with low credit scores by luring them in with the false promise of an easy fix to their credit score and then recruiting them to join a pyramid scheme selling the credit repair services to others"
"requiring them to end their fraudulent practices and turn over funds for injured consumers"
"permanent bans for scammers behind sprawling credit repair pyramid scheme"
The FTC issued a policy statement abandoning disparate-impact liability, stating it will no longer bring claims based on this theory. It also modified compliance obligations for several companies based on past decisions.
The FTC, along with Utah and California, filed a complaint against Hims & Hers alleging the telehealth provider shared consumers' sensitive health information with third-party advertising platforms without consent, and deceived consumers about billing and cancellation practices. The complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act and the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act.
$300K
The FTC alleged that Elite Events and Tickets LLC, doing business as Smart Scalpers, violated the Better Online Ticket Sales Act by circumventing security measures to bypass ticket purchase limits for over 2,400 events, reselling tickets at a profit. The proposed order requires payment of $300,000 (with a total penalty of $10.7 million partially suspended) and permanently prohibits the company and its owners from engaging in such circumvention tactics.
$45.9M
The FTC permanently banned Dennise Merdjanian from the debt relief industry and telemarketing after she and Superior Servicing LLC allegedly ran a student loan forgiveness scam that took more than $45.9 million from consumers. The proposed stipulated order imposes a partially suspended monetary judgment and resolves the FTC's litigation against the remaining defendants.
$16.5M
The FTC charged the founders of Celsius Network with deceiving consumers by falsely promising that cryptocurrency deposits were safe and always available. The founders agreed to pay $16.5 million and are banned from marketing or selling products that can be used to deposit or withdraw assets, among other restrictions.
$750K
The FTC finalized a settlement with Vanilla Chip LLC (doing business as TruHeight) and its principals over allegations that they deceptively advertised height-enhancing supplements for children and teenagers without competent and reliable scientific evidence. The FTC also alleged that TruHeight used fake social media bot profiles and relied on reviews written by employees, vendors, or consumers who received free products or discounts for 5-star reviews. Under the final order, TruHeight must pay $750,000 and is barred from making unsupported health claims or misrepresenting reviews.