The FTC settled with InMarket Media for unlawfully collecting and using consumers' precise location data without adequate notice and consent. The order prohibits InMarket from selling or sharing precise location data, requires deletion of collected data, and mandates consumer consent mechanisms and privacy programs.
InMarket is banned from selling or sharing precise location data, must delete previously collected location data unless consent is obtained or data is deidentified, must provide a way for consumers to withdraw consent and request deletion, and must create sensitive location data and privacy programs.
In-house legal teams should review all vendor agreements (particularly those involving SDK integrations or third-party data sources), customer contracts, and data processing addendums. Focus on clauses governing data collection scope, consent mechanisms, data sharing/licensing rights, data retention, and breach notification. Changes will likely be needed to explicitly prohibit the collection, use, or sharing of 'precise location data' without granular, informed consent; mandate data deletion protocols; require robust privacy programs; and impose obligations on any third-party SDK providers to obtain valid consumer consent.
Entity
InMarket Media
Also known as: InMarket
Industry
Data BrokerOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/05/ftc-finalizes-order-inmarket-prohibiting-it-selling-or-sharing-precise-location-data
InMarketMedia Complaint
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/InMarketMedia-Complaint.pdf
InMarketMedia DecisionandOrder
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/InMarketMedia-DecisionandOrder.pdf
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"InMarket Media"
"failed to fully inform consumers about how their location data—which can include sensitive information about where they live, work and worship—would be used"
"failed to ensure that third-party apps that use its SDK obtained informed consent from consumers."
"precise location data"
"unlawfully collected and used consumers’ location data"
$750K
The FTC finalized an order against Vanilla Chip LLC (doing business as TruHeight) and its principals for deceptively advertising height-enhancing supplements for children and teens without scientific evidence. The company also used fake reviews and incentivized 5-star ratings. The order requires a $750,000 payment and prohibits false health claims and deceptive review practices.
$2.3M
The FTC alleged that RentGrow, a tenant screening company, violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by failing to use reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy of its reports, including by reporting duplicate records and failing to disclose data sources. RentGrow agreed to pay a $2.25 million penalty and is prohibited from further FCRA violations and from misrepresenting dispute outcomes.
The FTC and New York Attorney General took action against Handy Technologies for deceptive earnings claims and failure to disclose fees and fines that led to millions of dollars being withheld from workers' wages. The FTC is sending over $2.7 million in refunds to 62,893 affected consumers.
$35.0M
The FTC alleged that Hopper, a travel booking app, charged consumers hidden and pre-selected fees (Tip and VIP Support) without their consent, misrepresented the benefits of VIP Support and Price Freeze services, and failed to clearly disclose total prices. Hopper agreed to pay $35 million for consumer redress and is prohibited from misrepresenting fees under a proposed order.
$1.5M
The FTC finalized a settlement with Publishing.com LLC and its principals for misleading consumers about potential earnings from self-publishing products. The company will pay $1.5 million and is prohibited from making unsubstantiated earnings claims, failing to disclose refund terms, and misrepresenting endorsements and reviews.
The FTC is seeking public comment on a proposed policy statement addressing concerns that AI companies may be manipulating AI system outputs contrary to consumer expectations for objectivity and accuracy. The statement explains that such conduct could be considered deceptive under Section 5 of the FTC Act. The public comment period runs until July 31, 2026.