Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementCritical RiskMultistate

FTC, DOJ Ban MyLife's Negative Option Marketing, Secure $21M for Consumers

MyLife.com, Inc.December 15, 2021Federal Trade Commission

Penalty Amount

$33,900,000

Summary

The FTC and DOJ settled with MyLife.com, Inc. and its CEO for deceiving consumers with misleading background reports that falsely implied criminal records and for engaging in difficult-to-cancel subscription practices. MyLife violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act, and Telemarketing Sales Rule. The settlement includes a permanent ban on negative option marketing, $33.9 million in judgments for consumer refunds, and a monitoring program.

Remedy

Permanent ban on negative option marketing, $33.9 million in judgments for consumer refunds (with $16 million partially suspended), and requirement for MyLife to implement a monitoring program for FCRA compliance.

BanMonetary PenaltyConsent DecreeCompliance ProgramConsumer Refunds

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review all customer-facing subscription agreements, service terms, and any vendor/data provider contracts where background reports are involved. Key clauses to scrutinize include: negative option/auto-renewal provisions, cancellation and termination procedures (ensuring they are simple and not 'difficult-to-cancel'), disclosures related to report content and limitations (especially regarding criminal/arrest records), billing and payment terms, refund policies, and any representations about data accuracy. Given the FCRA violation, contracts involving consumer reports must include robust compliance warranties and indemnification clauses. Changes may be needed to simplify cancellation processes, add clear, non-misleading disclosures about what reports contain (or do not contain), implement explicit consent for billing cycles, and strengthen FCRA-related obligations and audit rights.

Contract Search Terms

negative option marketingauto-renewing subscriptioncancellation mechanismbackground report disclosureFCRA complianceteaser reportbilling transparencysubscription termsconsumer consent for billingrefund policy

Laws Cited

Fair Credit Reporting ActRestore Online Shoppers’ Confidence ActTelemarketing Sales Rule

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

MyLife.com, Inc.

Also known as: MyLife.com

Industry

Data Broker

Multistate Coalition

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"MyLife.com, Inc."
Fine Amount
"Tinsley and MyLife agreed to separate judgments totaling $33.9 million."
Laws Cited
"violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA)"
Laws Cited
"violated the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act"
Laws Cited
"violated the Telemarketing Sales Rule"
Violation Types
"deceived consumers with misleading 'teaser background reports'"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

MyLife.com, Inc.

The FTC filed a complaint against MyLife.com, Inc. and its CEO for deceiving consumers with 'teaser background reports' that falsely claimed to include criminal and arrest records, and for violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act by failing to ensure accuracy and permissible purpose. The company also engaged in misleading billing practices under the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act and Telemarketing Sales Rule.

FTC

Vanilla Chip LLC

$750K

The FTC finalized an order against Vanilla Chip LLC (doing business as TruHeight) and its principals for deceptively advertising height-enhancing supplements for children and teens without scientific evidence. The company also used fake reviews and incentivized 5-star ratings. The order requires a $750,000 payment and prohibits false health claims and deceptive review practices.

FTC

RentGrow Inc.

$2.3M

The FTC alleged that RentGrow, a tenant screening company, violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by failing to use reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy of its reports, including by reporting duplicate records and failing to disclose data sources. RentGrow agreed to pay a $2.25 million penalty and is prohibited from further FCRA violations and from misrepresenting dispute outcomes.

FTC

Handy Technologies

The FTC and New York Attorney General took action against Handy Technologies for deceptive earnings claims and failure to disclose fees and fines that led to millions of dollars being withheld from workers' wages. The FTC is sending over $2.7 million in refunds to 62,893 affected consumers.

FTC

Hopper Inc.

$35.0M

The FTC alleged that Hopper, a travel booking app, charged consumers hidden and pre-selected fees (Tip and VIP Support) without their consent, misrepresented the benefits of VIP Support and Price Freeze services, and failed to clearly disclose total prices. Hopper agreed to pay $35 million for consumer redress and is prohibited from misrepresenting fees under a proposed order.

FTC

Publishing.com LLC

$1.5M

The FTC finalized a settlement with Publishing.com LLC and its principals for misleading consumers about potential earnings from self-publishing products. The company will pay $1.5 million and is prohibited from making unsubstantiated earnings claims, failing to disclose refund terms, and misrepresenting endorsements and reviews.