Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementHigh Risk

FTC Settles with Paddle for $5 Million Over Unfair Payment Processing Practices

PaddleJune 1, 2025Federal Trade Commission

Penalty Amount

$5,000,000

Summary

The FTC entered into a settlement with U.K.-based payment processor Paddle to resolve allegations that its unfair payment processing practices facilitated tech support scammers operating in Cyprus. Paddle agreed to pay a $5 million monetary penalty as part of the settlement.

Remedy

Paddle must pay $5 million to resolve the allegations; no additional remedies are detailed in the referenced 2025 press release.

Monetary Penalty

Contract Impact

This enforcement action involves non-privacy unfair payment processing practices facilitating fraud rather than privacy violations. In-house legal teams should review payment processor and vendor agreements for clauses related to fraud liability, unfair practice waivers, and due diligence requirements for downstream clients. No privacy-specific contract clauses require updating based on this action.

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Paddle

Industry

Financial Services

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Paddle"
Fine Amount
"5-million"
Violation Types
"unfair-payment-processing-practices-facilitation"
Event Date
"2025/06"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

Progress Residential and Pretium Partners

$49.8M

The FTC and four states alleged that Progress Residential and Pretium Partners misled renters about rental prices and fees, improperly withheld security deposits, and engaged in other unlawful conduct. Under a proposed settlement, the companies will pay $49.75 million and must change their pricing, deposit, and customer-service practices.

FTC

Amazon.com, Inc.

The FTC and 22 state attorneys general filed an updated complaint alleging that Amazon secretly added surcharges to advertising auction prices and misled advertisers about the reasons for price increases. The release describes newly unredacted allegations; it does not report a judgment, settlement, or monetary penalty.

FTC

Riverside Payments Inc.

$600K

The FTC and Washington alleged that Riverside Payments and affiliates misrepresented savings and cancellation terms, concealed fees and auto-renewing contracts, and obtained consumers’ financial information using false or fraudulent statements. The proposed stipulated order requires a $600,000 payment, customer notice and a period to rescind agreements without penalty, and prohibits deceptive claims while requiring clear disclosures, informed consent for negative-option billing, and a simple cancellation method.

FTC

25 companies that market or generate sales leads for healthcare plans (recipients not named)

FTC staff announced warning letters to 25 healthcare plan marketers and lead generators about deceptive or unfair claims concerning plan benefits, coverage, costs, and enrollment incentives. The letters do not allege wrongdoing by their recipients or impose penalties; they encourage companies to review their advertisements for compliance.

FTC

Multiple impersonation-scam operators

The FTC summarized enforcement actions and other efforts targeting businesses and individuals allegedly impersonating government agencies or legitimate businesses. The release reports more than $80 million in consumer redress across prior actions and takedowns of 19 websites, but it does not announce a new settlement or impose a specific penalty.

FTC

Toast Inc.

The FTC and state and local co-plaintiffs filed a lawsuit alleging Toast imposed hidden and unauthorized fees, enrolled restaurants in add-ons without consent, obstructed subscription cancellations, and misrepresented customer support availability. The complaint is pending in federal court; the press release announces no monetary penalty or imposed remedy.