Consumers Affected
130,000
SkyMed International, Inc. settled FTC allegations that it failed to secure sensitive consumer data, including health information, leaving a cloud database with 130,000 records exposed to the public. The FTC also alleged that SkyMed misrepresented HIPAA compliance on its website. As part of the settlement, SkyMed must implement a comprehensive security program, undergo biennial third-party assessments, and send notices to affected consumers.
SkyMed is required to establish and maintain a comprehensive information security program, obtain regular third-party audits, notify affected consumers about the data breach, and cease making false claims about its data security and HIPAA compliance.
In-house legal teams should review all agreements involving the processing of consumer health data, including vendor contracts, customer membership agreements, and data processing addendums. Specific clauses to examine are data security provisions, HIPAA compliance representations, breach notification obligations, and audit rights. Changes may be needed to mandate robust security measures like encryption and access controls, require regular third-party assessments, ensure accurate compliance certifications, and establish clear, timely breach notification procedures to protect sensitive health information.
Entity
SkyMed International, Inc.
Also known as: SkyMed International
Industry
HealthcareOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2020/12/company-provides-travel-emergency-services-settles-ftc-allegations-it-failed-secure-sensitive
skymed complaint
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/skymed_-_complaint.pdf
skymed consent order ftc signed
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/skymed_-_consent_order_ftc_signed.pdf
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"SkyMed International, Inc."
"HIPAA"
"failed to take reasonable steps to secure sensitive consumer information"
The FTC finalized a settlement with SkyMed International, Inc., an emergency travel services provider, for failing to secure sensitive consumer data and deceiving consumers about HIPAA compliance. The company left a cloud database with 130,000 membership records unsecured, containing personal and health information. Under the settlement, SkyMed must notify affected consumers, implement a security program, undergo biennial assessments, and is prohibited from misrepresenting its data practices.
$930K
The FTC finalized orders requiring CMG Media Corporation (doing business as Cox Media Group), MindSift LLC, and 1010 Digital Works LLC to pay a total of $930,000 for falsely claiming they offered an AI-powered service that could target ads based on conversations captured from consumers' smart devices, and that consumers had opted into such targeting. The orders also prohibit the companies from making misrepresentations about their advertising services, voice data collection, and consumer consent.
The FTC announced it is seeking public comment on a proposed enforcement policy statement regarding personalized pricing, which is the use of personal data to set prices based on what a company believes an individual consumer is willing to spend. The statement warns that undisclosed collection or use of personal data for personalized pricing could violate the FTC Act's prohibition on unfair or deceptive practices. The Commission voted 2-0 to authorize the Federal Register notice.
$4.0M
The FTC and Connecticut secured a $4 million settlement with Chase Nissan LLC (doing business as Manchester City Nissan) over allegations the dealership charged consumers unauthorized fees, including double-charging for 'certified pre-owned' vehicles and inserting charges like total loss protection into financing agreements without consent. The settlement requires $4 million in consumer redress, prohibits misrepresentations about vehicle certification and warranties, mandates prominent disclosure of the maximum total vehicle price, and requires express informed consent for all charges.
The FTC filed a complaint against Credit Glory LLC and related entities for deceptive credit repair practices, including false promises, impersonating debt collectors, charging illegal upfront fees, and using negative option billing without consent. A federal court temporarily halted the operation.
The FTC issued a policy statement abandoning disparate-impact liability, stating it will no longer bring claims based on this theory. It also modified compliance obligations for several companies based on past decisions.