Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementHigh RiskMultistate

Minnesota-led multistate settlement with General Motors over driver data

General MotorsOctober 29, 2026Minnesota Attorney General

Penalty Amount

$7,095,664

Summary

A bipartisan coalition of 36 attorneys general settled allegations that General Motors collected and sold drivers’ driving-behavior and location data to data brokers, whose customers included insurance companies. GM will pay $220 million nationally, with Minnesota receiving $7,095,664, and must obtain affirmative express consent before collecting or disclosing driving and location data.

Remedy

GM must pay Minnesota $7,095,664 as part of the $220 million national settlement, obtain affirmative express consent before collecting or disclosing consumer driving and location data, limit the driving data it collects, and protect personal information through a comprehensive privacy program. The settlement also requires internal and external privacy-program assessments and dealership oversight and training.

Monetary PenaltyConsent DecreeInjunctionAudit RequirementCompliance Program

Contract Impact

Review connected-vehicle, telematics, data-processing, and data-sharing agreements with vendors and data brokers for clear limits on collection, disclosure, onward sale, and insurance-related use of driving and location data, and require affirmative express consent where applicable. Review customer-facing privacy notices and consent flows to ensure they accurately describe tracking and sharing, and check dealership agreements and employee procedures for safeguards against enrolling customers without consent. Add or strengthen audit and assessment rights, data-minimization and retention obligations, privacy-program controls, and oversight and training requirements; verify that downstream recipients are bound to equivalent restrictions.

Contract Search Terms

affirmative express consentdriving behavior dataprecise location datadata sharing with data brokersinsurance data use restrictionsconnected vehicle privacy noticedealer enrollment consentprivacy program assessmentsdata minimization and retention

Laws Cited

Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act (MCDPA)

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

General Motors

Industry

Automotive

Multistate Coalition

Washington Attorney GeneralOregon Attorney GeneralAlabama Attorney GeneralAlaska Attorney GeneralArizona Attorney GeneralDistrict of Columbia Attorney GeneralFlorida Attorney GeneralHawai’i Attorney GeneralIdaho Attorney GeneralKansas Attorney GeneralMaine Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Attorney GeneralMichigan Attorney GeneralMississippi Attorney GeneralNevada Attorney GeneralNew Hampshire Attorney GeneralNew York Attorney GeneralNorth Carolina Attorney GeneralNorth Dakota Attorney GeneralOhio Attorney GeneralOklahoma Attorney GeneralPennsylvania Attorney GeneralSouth Carolina Attorney GeneralSouth Dakota Attorney GeneralVirginia Attorney GeneralWisconsin Attorney GeneralColorado Attorney GeneralConnecticut Attorney GeneralDelaware Attorney GeneralIllinois Attorney GeneralKentucky Attorney GeneralMaryland Attorney GeneralNew Jersey Attorney GeneralUtah Attorney GeneralVermont Attorney General

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"settlement with General Motors (“GM”)."
Fine Amount
"Minnesota will receive $7,095,664 from the settlement."
Laws Cited
"Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act (MCDPA)"
Violation Types
"Settles allegations General Motors sold consumers’ private driver behavior data and location information to third parties, including data brokers who sold data to insurance companies"
Consent Failure
"The settlement also requires GM to obtain affirmative express consent from consumers before collecting or disclosing consumer driving and location data."
Remedy Summary
"The settlement also requires GM to limit the driving data it collects from consumers and protect their personal information going forward as part of a comprehensive data privacy program."

Related Enforcement Actions

CO

General Motors

$220.0M

General Motors agreed to a nationwide $220 million settlement over allegations that it sold drivers’ identifiable driving behavior and location data to data brokers, which then sold it to insurers. The settlement requires affirmative express consent before collecting or disclosing driving and location data, limits data collection, and imposes privacy-program assessments and dealership oversight and training.

VA

General Motors

$220.0M

General Motors agreed to pay $220 million to resolve allegations that it sold identifiable driver behavior and location data to data brokers and insurers without adequately disclosing the practice or obtaining consumers’ consent. The settlement requires affirmative express consent before collecting or disclosing driving and location data, limits data collection, and imposes privacy-program assessments and dealership oversight and training.

CA

General Motors

$12.8M

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, along with multiple district attorneys and the California Privacy Protection Agency, announced a $12.75 million settlement with General Motors for illegally selling hundreds of thousands of Californians' location and driving data to data brokers Verisk and LexisNexis without notice or consent. The settlement includes the largest CCPA penalty to date, a five-year ban on selling driving data to consumer reporting agencies, and requirements to delete retained data and implement a robust privacy program.

CPPA

General Motors

$12.8M

CalPrivacy and the California Attorney General secured a $12.75 million settlement from General Motors for data sharing practices from connected vehicles. The settlement includes injunctive terms to change business practices.

TX

General Motors

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit against General Motors for unlawfully collecting private driving data from over 1.5 million Texas drivers without consent and selling the data to third parties including insurance companies. GM allegedly deceived customers into enrolling in products like OnStar Smart Driver by falsely claiming enrollment was required to retain vehicle safety features, while concealing that enrollment authorized systematic collection and sale of detailed driving data. The action follows an investigation launched in June 2024 as part of the Texas AG’s data privacy initiative, and seeks to hold GM accountable for violating state privacy laws.

MN

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison joined a multistate coalition suing to block a FinCEN rule that exempted nearly all businesses from Corporate Transparency Act reporting and announced that it would delete existing ownership information. The coalition alleges violations of federal law and asks the court to invalidate the rule and require FinCEN to continue collecting and maintaining the database; no penalty or court order is reported.