Court Rules
All enforcement actions
CoalitionLow RiskMultistate

Attorney General Davenport Leads Bipartisan Multistate Call for Federal Action on Rental Housing Fee Abuses, Puts New Jersey Landlords on Notice of State’s Application Fee Cap

New Jersey Landlords (general population, no specific entity named)April 13, 2026New Jersey Attorney General

Summary

New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport led a bipartisan coalition of 27 state attorneys general in submitting a comment letter to the Federal Trade Commission urging federal rulemaking to regulate hidden and deceptive rental housing fees. The AG also issued guidance clarifying New Jersey’s new $50 rental application fee cap, effective May 1, 2026, warning that deceptive fee practices may violate the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act. No specific enforcement action against a named individual entity was announced, with enforcement of the fee cap set to begin May 1, 2026.

Remedy

The multistate coalition urged the FTC to propose rules requiring full rental price disclosure, prohibiting deceptive rental fee practices, and preserving state regulatory authority. The NJ AG issued guidance clarifying that the $50 application fee cap applies to all associated costs including administrative and screening fees, and that charging fees for unavailable units, collecting fees from unqualified applicants, or soliciting excessive applications may violate the Consumer Fraud Act. Enforcement of the fee cap begins May 1, 2026.

Corrective Notice

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams for real estate and property management companies should review lease agreements, rental application forms, and fee disclosure documents to ensure compliance with New Jersey’s $50 rental application fee cap effective May 1, 2026. Clauses related to application fees, administrative or screening costs, and fee disclosure must be updated to include all associated costs and cap total fees at $50. Teams should also add prohibitions on charging fees for unavailable rental units, collecting fees from knowingly unqualified applicants, or soliciting excessive applications, as these practices may violate the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act. For multi-state operators, review fee practices across all jurisdictions to align with the bipartisan coalition’s call for transparent, non-deceptive rental fee practices.

Contract Search Terms

rental application fee caphidden rental fee disclosuretotal rental price disclosuredeceptive fee practicesNew Jersey Consumer Fraud Actapplication fee screening costsunavailable unit rental feesexcessive rental application fees

Laws Cited

New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act (CFA)

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

New Jersey Landlords (general population, no specific entity named)

Industry

Real Estate

Multistate Coalition

ColoradoPennsylvaniaTennesseeAlaskaArizonaCaliforniaConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaHawaiiIllinoisMaineMarylandMassachusettsMinnesotaNevadaNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaOregonRhode IslandVermontVirginiaWashingtonWisconsin

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Title
"Attorney General Davenport Leads Bipartisan Multistate Call for Federal Action on Rental Housing Fee Abuses, Puts New Jersey Landlords on Notice of State’s Application Fee Cap"
Event Date
"For Immediate Release: April 13, 2026"
Jurisdiction
"Office of The Attorney General"
Event Type
"leading a bipartisan coalition of 27 attorneys general urging the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to propose a rule"
Event Type
"publishing guidance putting landlords on notice"
Entity Name
"New Jersey Landlords"

Related Enforcement Actions

NJ

Trump Administration

A multistate coalition co-led by New Jersey won a federal court order rejecting the Trump Administration’s decision not to request funding for the CFPB. The order struck down that decision and directed the Administration to follow the law and fund the agency; no monetary penalty or privacy violation is described.

NJ

Mitragynine pseudoindoxyl, MGM-15, and MGM-16

New Jersey’s Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs alerted the public that three synthetic kratom-related compounds became illegal to possess or sell in the state under a temporary federal scheduling order. The release describes a controlled-substance alert, not a privacy enforcement action, and identifies no company, privacy violation, or monetary penalty.

NJ

Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LabCorp)

$2.3M

Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings agreed to pay $2,287,455 to participating states and strengthen its security and vendor-management practices following an investigation into the 2019 breach at its debt-collection vendor, AMCA. The breach potentially exposed information of more than 27.5 million people nationwide, including sensitive information belonging to approximately 10.2 million LabCorp patients.

NJ

Credit Acceptance Corporation (CAC)

$694.0M

New Jersey's Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs, along with 41 Attorneys General, reached a $694 million settlement with subprime auto lender Credit Acceptance Corporation over allegations it originated unaffordable loans its own systems predicted borrowers could not repay, employed aggressive debt-collection tactics, and failed to prevent deceptive vehicle-service contract and GAP product 'packing' by dealers. The multistate settlement stepped in after the CFPB permanently dropped its 2023 enforcement action against CAC in 2025. CAC will provide $60 million in cash restitution, $634 million in debt relief, an additional $15 million to the states, and implement injunctive lending reforms including loan off ramps, pre-loan disclosures, add-on packing safeguards, and a seven-year vehicle price cap. Note: this is a consumer-protection lending enforcement action, not a privacy matter; violation categories are best-fit mappings from the available taxonomy.

NJ

Match Group, Inc.

$650K

The New Jersey Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs announced that Match Group, Inc. will pay $650,000 and change its business practices to settle allegations that it misrepresented or failed to disclose its criminal background screening policies and practices to New Jersey users, violating the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and the Internet Dating Safety Act. Under a Consent Order, Match must accurately represent its screening policies, notify existing New Jersey members of updated disclosures within 150 days, and post clear and conspicuous disclosures and safety notifications about the limitations of criminal background screenings.

NJ

Glenmark, Lannett, Bausch, Apotex, Heritage, and Emcure

$96.5M

New Jersey and a coalition of states and territories obtained preliminary approval for a plan to distribute funds from settlements with generic drug manufacturers accused of conspiring to raise drug prices. The settlements total approximately $96.5 million, and eligible consumers may submit claims for compensation.