Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Enforcement ActionLow RiskMultistate

Bipartisan Multistate Lawsuit Against OneMain Financial for Hidden Loan Add-On Junk Fees

OneMain Financial, Inc.March 16, 2026New Jersey Attorney General

Summary

New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport, joined by a bipartisan coalition of 12 other state attorneys general, filed a multistate lawsuit against OneMain Financial, Inc. for allegedly hiding junk fees for add-on loan products in dense fine print, pressuring borrowers to accept unwanted products, and violating state consumer protection laws. The coalition seeks consumer refunds, civil penalties, disgorgement of profits, and a court order halting the illegal practices, correcting credit reports, and dropping collection actions related to the add-ons.

Remedy

The bipartisan coalition of 13 state attorneys general seeks consumer refunds for unlawfully charged add-on products, civil penalties for state law violations, disgorgement of all profits derived from the alleged scheme, an injunction to halt illegal sales practices, an order requiring OneMain to withdraw negative credit reporting related to the add-ons, and dismissal of all collection actions and lawsuits against consumers for the add-on products.

Monetary PenaltyConsumer RefundsInjunctionCorrective Notice

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams at consumer lending institutions should review loan agreements with borrowers to ensure all add-on products, fees, and terms are clearly disclosed in plain language, not buried in fine print, and that explicit, uncoerced consent is obtained for any add-ons. Vendor agreements with third-party add-on providers (e.g., credit insurance, membership programs) should be reviewed to ensure fee transparency, cancellation rights for consumers, and compliance with state consumer protection laws. Employee contracts and compensation policies should be audited to remove incentives that pressure employees to sell unwanted add-ons to borrowers. Additionally, credit reporting clauses should be updated to ensure accurate reporting and processes for correcting negative information related to unauthorized add-ons.

Contract Search Terms

add-on product feeloan add-on clauseundisclosed feeconsent to add-onsnegative credit reportingcancellation of add-onsrefund junk feesfine print disclosure

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

OneMain Financial, Inc.

Industry

Financial Services

Multistate Coalition

Pennsylvania Attorney GeneralNew York Attorney GeneralColorado Attorney GeneralMaryland Attorney GeneralNevada Attorney GeneralNew Hampshire Attorney GeneralNorth Dakota Attorney GeneralOklahoma Attorney GeneralSouth Dakota Attorney GeneralVirginia Attorney GeneralWashington Attorney GeneralWisconsin Attorney General

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"OneMain Financial, Inc."
Event Date
"For Immediate Release: March 16, 2026"
Event Date
"today sued one of the nation’s largest subprime installment lenders, OneMain Financial, Inc."
Jurisdiction
"Office of The Attorney General"
Violation Types
"charged consumers junk fees for add-ons to the installment loans they sold. The complaint alleges that the products were frequently hidden from borrowers or snuck into loans without their consent."
Violation Types
"borrowers are also rushed through in-person loan closings and are provided with even less of an opportunity to adequately review loan disclosures in remote closings. These loan disclosures are often displayed in tiny, hard-to-read print. Even when borrowers spotted the add-ons and tried to decline, OneMain’s alleged policy was to continue to pressure borrowers until they explicitly said “no” three times."

Related Enforcement Actions

NJ

Trump Administration

A multistate coalition co-led by New Jersey won a federal court order rejecting the Trump Administration’s decision not to request funding for the CFPB. The order struck down that decision and directed the Administration to follow the law and fund the agency; no monetary penalty or privacy violation is described.

NJ

Mitragynine pseudoindoxyl, MGM-15, and MGM-16

New Jersey’s Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs alerted the public that three synthetic kratom-related compounds became illegal to possess or sell in the state under a temporary federal scheduling order. The release describes a controlled-substance alert, not a privacy enforcement action, and identifies no company, privacy violation, or monetary penalty.

NJ

Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LabCorp)

$2.3M

Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings agreed to pay $2,287,455 to participating states and strengthen its security and vendor-management practices following an investigation into the 2019 breach at its debt-collection vendor, AMCA. The breach potentially exposed information of more than 27.5 million people nationwide, including sensitive information belonging to approximately 10.2 million LabCorp patients.

NJ

Credit Acceptance Corporation (CAC)

$694.0M

New Jersey's Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs, along with 41 Attorneys General, reached a $694 million settlement with subprime auto lender Credit Acceptance Corporation over allegations it originated unaffordable loans its own systems predicted borrowers could not repay, employed aggressive debt-collection tactics, and failed to prevent deceptive vehicle-service contract and GAP product 'packing' by dealers. The multistate settlement stepped in after the CFPB permanently dropped its 2023 enforcement action against CAC in 2025. CAC will provide $60 million in cash restitution, $634 million in debt relief, an additional $15 million to the states, and implement injunctive lending reforms including loan off ramps, pre-loan disclosures, add-on packing safeguards, and a seven-year vehicle price cap. Note: this is a consumer-protection lending enforcement action, not a privacy matter; violation categories are best-fit mappings from the available taxonomy.

NJ

Match Group, Inc.

$650K

The New Jersey Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs announced that Match Group, Inc. will pay $650,000 and change its business practices to settle allegations that it misrepresented or failed to disclose its criminal background screening policies and practices to New Jersey users, violating the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and the Internet Dating Safety Act. Under a Consent Order, Match must accurately represent its screening policies, notify existing New Jersey members of updated disclosures within 150 days, and post clear and conspicuous disclosures and safety notifications about the limitations of criminal background screenings.

NJ

Glenmark, Lannett, Bausch, Apotex, Heritage, and Emcure

$96.5M

New Jersey and a coalition of states and territories obtained preliminary approval for a plan to distribute funds from settlements with generic drug manufacturers accused of conspiring to raise drug prices. The settlements total approximately $96.5 million, and eligible consumers may submit claims for compensation.