Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Enforcement ActionLow RiskMultistate

Attorney General James Wins Court Order Protecting SNAP Recipients’ Sensitive Personal Information

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)September 19, 2025New York Attorney General

Summary

A coalition of 21 state attorneys general led by New York Attorney General Letitia James obtained a temporary restraining order from the District Court for the Northern District of California blocking the USDA from demanding personally identifiable information of all SNAP recipients, including Social Security numbers, home addresses, and immigration statuses. The lawsuit argued that the USDA’s demand violated federal and state laws prohibiting disclosure of SNAP data except in narrow circumstances, and that the data would be used for immigration enforcement against recipients. The order also prohibits the USDA from withholding SNAP funding from plaintiff states that refuse to comply with the data demand.

Remedy

The District Court issued a temporary restraining order blocking the USDA from demanding plaintiff states turn over personally identifiable information of SNAP recipients, and prohibited the USDA from withholding SNAP funding from states that refuse to comply with the data demand.

Injunction

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams, particularly those at organizations that administer or contract with state or federal social services programs like SNAP, should review all contract clauses related to data sharing with government agencies, disclosure of beneficiary personally identifiable information (PII), and compliance with agency data demands. Teams should verify that contracts prohibit sharing PII except as explicitly permitted by applicable federal and state privacy laws, restrict use of beneficiary data to program administration purposes (excluding immigration enforcement), and include protections against funding withholding for refusing unlawful data demands. Additionally, clauses governing required PII disclosures should be updated to align with court-ordered restrictions on agency data collection.

Contract Search Terms

SNAP data sharing agreementsfederal agency data demandspersonally identifiable information disclosureimmigration enforcement data useSocial Security number sharingstate SNAP privacy lawsSNAP funding withholding clauses

Laws Cited

Federal laws prohibiting SNAP data disclosureState laws prohibiting SNAP data disclosure

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)

Industry

Other

Multistate Coalition

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)"
Laws Cited
"Both federal and state laws prohibit states from disclosing personally identifying SNAP data except under narrow circumstances."
Violation Types
"this highly sensitive data, which includes home addresses, Social Security numbers, recent locations, immigration statuses, and more, would likely be shared across federal agencies and used for immigration enforcement, in violation of the law."
Event Date
"September 19, 2025"
Jurisdiction
"New York Attorney General Letitia James"
Is Multistate
"Attorney General James and a coalition of 20 other attorneys general and the state of Kentucky"

Related Enforcement Actions

CA

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)

New York Attorney General Letitia James joined a multistate coalition of 21 attorneys general and Kentucky in filing a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) challenging its illegal demand for personally identifiable information of over 40 million SNAP recipients. The coalition alleges the USDA’s requirement that states turn over SNAP recipients’ Social Security numbers, addresses, and immigration statuses violates federal and state laws prohibiting disclosure of SNAP data for non-program purposes, and that the data will be shared across federal agencies for unauthorized immigration enforcement. The coalition seeks a declaratory judgment declaring the policy illegal and a nationwide injunction preventing enforcement of the data demand.

NY

Cal-Maine Foods, Versova/Centrum, and Hickman's Egg Ranch

$3.3M

New York Attorney General James announced a multistate settlement with three major egg producers for illegally coordinating to influence a daily egg price index, artificially inflating prices for consumers. The companies will deliver 53 million eggs to food banks and pay $3.3 million, along with adopting compliance measures.

NY

Cal-Maine Foods, Versova/Centrum, Hickman's Egg Ranch

$3.3M

New York Attorney General Letitia James, along with the U.S. Department of Justice and 16 other states, reached a settlement with three major egg producers—Cal-Maine Foods, Versova/Centrum, and Hickman's Egg Ranch—for illegally coordinating to manipulate the Urner Barry price index, artificially inflating egg prices nationwide. The companies will deliver 53 million eggs to food banks across participating states, pay $3.3 million, and adopt compliance measures to prevent future violations.

NY

N/A

New York Attorney General Letitia James issued a consumer alert warning New Yorkers about gold bar scams targeting seniors, where scammers trick victims into converting money into gold bars. The alert provides tips to help consumers avoid falling victim to these scams.

NY

Cal-Maine Foods, Versova/Centrum, and Hickman's Egg Ranch

$3.3M

New York Attorney General Letitia James announced a multistate settlement with Cal-Maine Foods, Versova/Centrum, and Hickman's Egg Ranch for illegally coordinating to manipulate the Urner Barry egg price index, artificially inflating egg prices. The companies will deliver 53 million eggs to food banks and pay $3.3 million, along with compliance measures.

NY

Cal-Maine Foods, Versova/Centrum, and Hickman's Egg Ranch

$3.3M

New York Attorney General Letitia James and a bipartisan multistate coalition, alongside the U.S. Department of Justice, settled with three major egg producers for illegally coordinating to manipulate the Urner Barry daily price index, artificially inflating egg prices for retailers and consumers. The companies will deliver 53 million eggs to food banks nationwide, including 4,968,000 eggs to New York, and pay a combined $3.3 million, along with adopting compliance measures to prevent future violations.