Penalty Amount
$1,375,000,000
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton secured a $1.375 billion settlement with Google for unlawfully tracking Texans' geolocation data, incognito browsing activity, and biometric identifiers without consent. This is the largest single-state privacy settlement against Google, significantly larger than multistate settlements. The agreement resolves two major privacy enforcement actions brought by Texas.
Google must pay $1.375 billion to the State of Texas as part of the settlement agreement.
In-house legal teams should review vendor agreements with technology providers, particularly those offering location-based services, biometric data processing, or web analytics tools, to ensure explicit user consent is obtained for all data collection. Contracts should include clear prohibitions on tracking users in private or incognito browsing modes, require specific opt-in consent for geolocation and biometric data collection, and mandate compliance with state deceptive trade practices and privacy laws. Teams should also verify that vendors do not use dark patterns or deceptive practices to obtain user consent, and that all data collection is limited to purposes explicitly disclosed and consented to by users.
Entity
Industry
TechnologyOfficial Press Release
attorney general ken paxton secures historic 1375 billion se
https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/attorney-general-ken-paxton-secures-historic-1375-billion-settlement-google-related-texans-data
Texas Attorney General Enforcement Page
https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/consumer-protection/privacy
"Google has signed the historic $1.375 billion settlement agreement with the State of Texas"
"$1.375 billion"
"unlawfully tracking and collecting users’ private data regarding geolocation, incognito browsing activity, and biometric identifiers"
"October 31, 2025"
"State of Texas"
"settlement agreement"
$700.0M
Antitrust enforcement action where Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield secured a $700 million settlement from Google for anticompetitive practices in the Google Play Store. The settlement will provide automatic payouts to consumers who made purchases between August 2016 and September 2023, and requires Google to change its practices to stop the anticompetitive conduct. The settlement is pending court approval as of April 30, 2026.
$1.4B
Attorney General Ken Paxton sued Google for unlawfully tracking and collecting Texans' private data, including geolocation, incognito searches, and biometric data. The case resulted in a $1.375 billion settlement, the largest ever against Google for state privacy enforcement, marking a major win for data privacy rights.
$93.0M
California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced a $93 million settlement with Google resolving allegations that the company violated state consumer protection laws through deceptive location-privacy practices. Google was accused of falsely telling users that turning off the “Location History” setting would stop location data collection, while continuing to collect and use location data for user profiling and targeted advertising without informed consent. In addition to the monetary penalty, Google must implement several injunctive measures to increase transparency and user control over location tracking.
$391.5M
Google settled with 40 state attorneys general over allegations that it misled consumers about location tracking practices. Google will pay $391.5 million and must enhance transparency and user controls for location data collection.
$391.5M
Connecticut and 39 other states secured a $391.5 million settlement with Google for misleading consumers about location tracking and continuing to collect data after users opted out. The settlement mandates Google to enhance transparency and user controls for location settings, including clear disclosures and user-friendly account controls.
Attorney General William Tong of Connecticut joined a multistate coalition of 37 attorneys general in filing a lawsuit against Google alleging antitrust violations related to the Google Play Store and Google Billing. The lawsuit claims Google used its dominance to restrict competition, force developers to use Google Billing, and charge high commissions up to 30%. The action seeks to restore competition in the app market and halt Google's anticompetitive practices.