Penalty Amount
$4,250,000
AppFolio, Inc., a tenant background report provider, settled with the FTC for $4.25 million over allegations it violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act by failing to implement reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy of its screening reports and by including eviction and non-conviction criminal records older than seven years. The settlement prohibits including old records and requires maintaining accuracy procedures.
AppFolio must pay $4.25 million, is prohibited from including non-conviction criminal or eviction records older than seven years in its reports, and must maintain reasonable procedures to ensure the maximum possible accuracy of its background reports.
In-house legal teams should review all vendor and customer agreements where the company either provides or consumes tenant/background screening reports. Specifically examine clauses governing data accuracy, FCRA compliance certifications, data sourcing from third parties, and restrictions on the age of reported records (e.g., evictions, non-convictions). Agreements with property management clients (as vendors) may require amendments to mandate adherence to FCRA's 'reasonable procedures' standard and prohibit inclusion of records older than seven years. Contracts with third-party data providers should be scrutinized for warranties of accuracy and compliance. Consider adding audit rights, indemnification for FCRA violations, and explicit requirements for maintaining up-to-date accuracy procedures.
Entity
AppFolio, Inc.
Also known as: AppFolio
Industry
Data BrokerOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2020/12/tenant-background-report-provider-settles-ftc-allegations-it-failed-follow-accuracy-requirements
ecf 1 us v appfolio complaint
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/ecf_1_-_us_v_appfolio_complaint.pdf
ecf 2 us v appfolio stipulated order
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/ecf_2_-_us_v_appfolio_stipulated_order.pdf
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"AppFolio, Inc."
"$4.25 million"
"Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA)"
"failed to implement reasonable procedures to ensure that criminal and eviction records it received from a third party vendor were accurate before including such information in its tenant screening reports."
"including eviction or non-conviction criminal records more than seven years old in its reports."
The FTC filed a complaint alleging that GovAssist LLC, Entry LLC, and Scott Zuckerman used deceptive paid search ads, misleading service and pricing claims, and fake reviews to deceive consumers seeking passport services. The complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act, the Impersonation Rule, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; the case will be decided by the court, and no penalty or remedy is reported as imposed.
The FTC issued its annual report to Congress describing fraud trends affecting older adults and the agency’s enforcement, education, and outreach efforts. The report is not a specific privacy enforcement action and announces no penalty or remedy.
The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.
$106.8M
A federal court entered a $106.8 million default judgment against corporate defendants in an alleged debt-relief scheme that impersonated banks and government entities and targeted seniors and veterans. The judgment permanently bans the defendants from the debt-relief industry and imposes additional prohibitions, including on impersonation, telemarketing, and misrepresentations.
The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.
The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.