Consumer fraud and advertising enforcement action where the FTC sent warning letters to 97 auto dealership groups for deceptive pricing practices, such as advertising prices that exclude mandatory fees, misleading consumers about total costs. The letters stress the need for truthful and transparent pricing in the automotive industry.
No formal remedies imposed; the FTC issued warning letters urging dealers to ensure advertised prices include all mandatory fees and to review practices for compliance with the FTC Act.
In-house legal teams at automotive dealerships should review all advertising vendor agreements and consumer sales contracts to ensure compliance with FTC pricing rules. Vendor agreements with marketing firms must include clauses requiring all mandatory fees to be included in advertised vehicle prices, clear disclosure of rebate eligibility requirements, and prohibitions on conditioning prices on dealer financing. Customer sales contracts should be audited to confirm final prices match advertised rates with no undisclosed charges, and internal compliance policies should mandate regular review of marketing materials against FTC Act standards.
Entity
97 Auto Dealership Groups
Also known as: Auto Dealership Groups
Industry
AutomotiveOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/03/ftc-warns-97-auto-dealership-groups-about-deceptive-pricing
template auto warning letter
https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/warning-letters/template-auto-warning-letter
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"to 97 auto groups nationwide"
"compliance with the FTC Act and other rules"
"advertising a price that does not reflect all required fees,"
The FTC filed a complaint alleging that GovAssist LLC, Entry LLC, and Scott Zuckerman used deceptive paid search ads, misleading service and pricing claims, and fake reviews to deceive consumers seeking passport services. The complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act, the Impersonation Rule, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; the case will be decided by the court, and no penalty or remedy is reported as imposed.
The FTC issued its annual report to Congress describing fraud trends affecting older adults and the agency’s enforcement, education, and outreach efforts. The report is not a specific privacy enforcement action and announces no penalty or remedy.
The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.
$106.8M
A federal court entered a $106.8 million default judgment against corporate defendants in an alleged debt-relief scheme that impersonated banks and government entities and targeted seniors and veterans. The judgment permanently bans the defendants from the debt-relief industry and imposes additional prohibitions, including on impersonation, telemarketing, and misrepresentations.
The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.
The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.