Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementHigh Risk

FTC Penalizes Cerebral $7M for Health Data Sharing and Deceptive Practices

Cerebral, Inc.April 15, 2024Federal Trade Commission

Penalty Amount

$7,000,000

Consumers Affected

3,200,000

Summary

The FTC settled with telehealth firm Cerebral, Inc. for sharing sensitive consumer mental health data with third parties like LinkedIn, Snapchat, and TikTok for advertising without proper consent, employing sloppy security practices, and misleading consumers about cancellation policies. Cerebral must pay over $7 million (with $2 million due upfront), is permanently banned from using health information for most advertising, must implement a comprehensive privacy program, delete unnecessary data, and provide easy cancellation.

Remedy

Cerebral must pay $7 million total ($5.1 million for consumer refunds and a $10 million suspended civil penalty after a $2 million payment). The company is permanently banned from using or disclosing personal and health information for most marketing/advertising without consent, must implement a comprehensive privacy and data security program, delete most consumer data not needed for treatment/payment/operations, provide an easy cancellation mechanism, post a corrective notice on its website, and face ongoing monitoring and reporting requirements.

Monetary PenaltyInjunctionConsent DecreeAudit RequirementCompliance ProgramData DeletionConsumer RefundsReporting RequirementsCorrective Notice

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review all vendor agreements where Cerebral shares data with third parties (e.g., LinkedIn, Snapchat, TikTok) for advertising, focusing on data sharing clauses and consent requirements. Customer agreements, including terms of service and privacy policies, must be examined for provisions on health data usage, advertising consent, cancellation policies, and data security standards. Data processing agreements should be checked for compliance with health data protection. Required changes include adding explicit opt-in consent for using health information in advertising, prohibiting such use entirely per the order, enhancing security measures, ensuring easy cancellation processes, and updating data retention and breach notification clauses to align with the settlement.

Contract Search Terms

health data sharing consentadvertising consent mechanismthird-party data sharingcancellation policy claritydata security practicessensitive health informationtelehealth data protectionconsumer deceptiondata retention schedulebreach notification clause

Laws Cited

FTC Act Section 5Opioid Addiction Recovery Fraud Prevention Act of 2018 (OARFPA)Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act (ROSCA)

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Cerebral, Inc.

Also known as: Cerebral

Industry

Healthcare

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Cerebral, Inc. has agreed to an order"
Fine Amount
"require it to pay $7 million"
Fine Amount
"pay more than $7 million"
Violation Types
"disclosed consumers’ sensitive personal health information and other sensitive data to third parties for advertising purposes"
Violation Types
"failed to deploy adequate safeguards for the sensitive data collected from consumers and engaged in sloppy security practices"
Violation Types
"failed to clearly disclose all material terms of Cerebral’s cancellation policies before charging consumers"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

Vanilla Chip LLC

$750K

The FTC finalized an order against Vanilla Chip LLC (doing business as TruHeight) and its principals for deceptively advertising height-enhancing supplements for children and teens without scientific evidence. The company also used fake reviews and incentivized 5-star ratings. The order requires a $750,000 payment and prohibits false health claims and deceptive review practices.

FTC

RentGrow Inc.

$2.3M

The FTC alleged that RentGrow, a tenant screening company, violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by failing to use reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy of its reports, including by reporting duplicate records and failing to disclose data sources. RentGrow agreed to pay a $2.25 million penalty and is prohibited from further FCRA violations and from misrepresenting dispute outcomes.

FTC

Handy Technologies

The FTC and New York Attorney General took action against Handy Technologies for deceptive earnings claims and failure to disclose fees and fines that led to millions of dollars being withheld from workers' wages. The FTC is sending over $2.7 million in refunds to 62,893 affected consumers.

FTC

Hopper Inc.

$35.0M

The FTC alleged that Hopper, a travel booking app, charged consumers hidden and pre-selected fees (Tip and VIP Support) without their consent, misrepresented the benefits of VIP Support and Price Freeze services, and failed to clearly disclose total prices. Hopper agreed to pay $35 million for consumer redress and is prohibited from misrepresenting fees under a proposed order.

FTC

Publishing.com LLC

$1.5M

The FTC finalized a settlement with Publishing.com LLC and its principals for misleading consumers about potential earnings from self-publishing products. The company will pay $1.5 million and is prohibited from making unsubstantiated earnings claims, failing to disclose refund terms, and misrepresenting endorsements and reviews.

FTC

Federal Trade Commission

The FTC is seeking public comment on a proposed policy statement addressing concerns that AI companies may be manipulating AI system outputs contrary to consumer expectations for objectivity and accuracy. The statement explains that such conduct could be considered deceptive under Section 5 of the FTC Act. The public comment period runs until July 31, 2026.