Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementMedium Risk

FTC Settles Golden Sunrise Nutraceutical for $103K Over False Health Claims

Golden Sunrise Nutraceutical, Inc.September 1, 2025Federal Trade Commission

Penalty Amount

$103,420

Summary

The FTC distributed refunds to consumers who purchased deceptively marketed treatment plans from Golden Sunrise Nutraceutical. The company and its medical director were barred from making unsupported health claims about curing COVID-19, cancer, and Parkinson's disease after a court order in September 2025. Over $40,700 was sent to 578 consumers, with additional claims possible until May 2026.

Remedy

Defendants were ordered to pay $103,420 in monetary penalties, barred from making unsupported health claims in the future, and required to provide refunds to affected consumers totaling over $40,700.

Monetary PenaltyInjunctionConsumer Refunds

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review all customer-facing agreements (including sales contracts, terms of service, and marketing partnership agreements) and vendor agreements where marketing materials or product descriptions are provided. Focus on representations and warranties clauses regarding the accuracy of marketing claims, compliance with FTC Act Section 5, and product efficacy statements. Specific clauses to scrutinize include those governing marketing material approval processes, indemnification for regulatory actions, and termination rights for breach of compliance obligations. Changes may be needed to require pre-approval of any health-related claims, mandate documented scientific evidence for efficacy statements, and include explicit prohibitions against claiming products can cure specific diseases like COVID-19, cancer, or Parkinson's without FDA review and approval.

Contract Search Terms

health claims representation warrantyscientific substantiation requirementtreatment plan marketing clausecure claims prohibitionFTC compliance warrantyproduct efficacy disclaimermarketing material pre-approvalregulatory compliance indemnityfalse advertising clauseconsumer protection adherence

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Golden Sunrise Nutraceutical, Inc.

Also known as: Golden Sunrise Nutraceutical

Industry

Healthcare

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Golden Sunrise Nutraceutical, Inc."
Fine Amount
"ordered to pay $103,420"
Violation Types
"deceptively advertising a $23,000 treatment plan as a scientifically proven way to treat COVID-19, and used false or unproven claims that other treatment plans could cure cancer and Parkinson’s disease"
Consumers Affected
"578 affected consumers"
Event Date
"In September 2025"
Remedy Types
"barred them from making unsupported health claims in the future"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

Vanilla Chip LLC

$750K

The FTC finalized an order against Vanilla Chip LLC (doing business as TruHeight) and its principals for deceptively advertising height-enhancing supplements for children and teens without scientific evidence. The company also used fake reviews and incentivized 5-star ratings. The order requires a $750,000 payment and prohibits false health claims and deceptive review practices.

FTC

RentGrow Inc.

$2.3M

The FTC alleged that RentGrow, a tenant screening company, violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by failing to use reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy of its reports, including by reporting duplicate records and failing to disclose data sources. RentGrow agreed to pay a $2.25 million penalty and is prohibited from further FCRA violations and from misrepresenting dispute outcomes.

FTC

Handy Technologies

The FTC and New York Attorney General took action against Handy Technologies for deceptive earnings claims and failure to disclose fees and fines that led to millions of dollars being withheld from workers' wages. The FTC is sending over $2.7 million in refunds to 62,893 affected consumers.

FTC

Hopper Inc.

$35.0M

The FTC alleged that Hopper, a travel booking app, charged consumers hidden and pre-selected fees (Tip and VIP Support) without their consent, misrepresented the benefits of VIP Support and Price Freeze services, and failed to clearly disclose total prices. Hopper agreed to pay $35 million for consumer redress and is prohibited from misrepresenting fees under a proposed order.

FTC

Publishing.com LLC

$1.5M

The FTC finalized a settlement with Publishing.com LLC and its principals for misleading consumers about potential earnings from self-publishing products. The company will pay $1.5 million and is prohibited from making unsubstantiated earnings claims, failing to disclose refund terms, and misrepresenting endorsements and reviews.

FTC

Federal Trade Commission

The FTC is seeking public comment on a proposed policy statement addressing concerns that AI companies may be manipulating AI system outputs contrary to consumer expectations for objectivity and accuracy. The statement explains that such conduct could be considered deceptive under Section 5 of the FTC Act. The public comment period runs until July 31, 2026.