Penalty Amount
$103,420
The FTC distributed refunds to consumers who purchased deceptively marketed treatment plans from Golden Sunrise Nutraceutical. The company and its medical director were barred from making unsupported health claims about curing COVID-19, cancer, and Parkinson's disease after a court order in September 2025. Over $40,700 was sent to 578 consumers, with additional claims possible until May 2026.
Defendants were ordered to pay $103,420 in monetary penalties, barred from making unsupported health claims in the future, and required to provide refunds to affected consumers totaling over $40,700.
In-house legal teams should review all customer-facing agreements (including sales contracts, terms of service, and marketing partnership agreements) and vendor agreements where marketing materials or product descriptions are provided. Focus on representations and warranties clauses regarding the accuracy of marketing claims, compliance with FTC Act Section 5, and product efficacy statements. Specific clauses to scrutinize include those governing marketing material approval processes, indemnification for regulatory actions, and termination rights for breach of compliance obligations. Changes may be needed to require pre-approval of any health-related claims, mandate documented scientific evidence for efficacy statements, and include explicit prohibitions against claiming products can cure specific diseases like COVID-19, cancer, or Parkinson's without FDA review and approval.
Entity
Golden Sunrise Nutraceutical, Inc.
Also known as: Golden Sunrise Nutraceutical
Industry
HealthcareOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/02/ftc-sends-checks-consumers-who-bought-certain-products-golden-sunrise-nutraceutical-between-2017
promoter 23000 covid 19 treatment plan barred making bogus h
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2021/06/promoter-23000-covid-19-treatment-plan-barred-making-bogus-health-claims
GoldenSunrise Order
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/GoldenSunrise-Order.pdf
ftc announces refund claims process consumers who bought dec
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/01/ftc-announces-refund-claims-process-consumers-who-bought-deceptively-marketed-golden-sunrise
GoldenSunrise
https://www.ftc.gov/GoldenSunrise
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"Golden Sunrise Nutraceutical, Inc."
"ordered to pay $103,420"
"deceptively advertising a $23,000 treatment plan as a scientifically proven way to treat COVID-19, and used false or unproven claims that other treatment plans could cure cancer and Parkinson’s disease"
"578 affected consumers"
"In September 2025"
"barred them from making unsupported health claims in the future"
$930K
The FTC finalized orders requiring CMG Media Corporation (doing business as Cox Media Group), MindSift LLC, and 1010 Digital Works LLC to pay a total of $930,000 for falsely claiming they offered an AI-powered service that could target ads based on conversations captured from consumers' smart devices, and that consumers had opted into such targeting. The orders also prohibit the companies from making misrepresentations about their advertising services, voice data collection, and consumer consent.
The FTC announced it is seeking public comment on a proposed enforcement policy statement regarding personalized pricing, which is the use of personal data to set prices based on what a company believes an individual consumer is willing to spend. The statement warns that undisclosed collection or use of personal data for personalized pricing could violate the FTC Act's prohibition on unfair or deceptive practices. The Commission voted 2-0 to authorize the Federal Register notice.
$4.0M
The FTC and Connecticut secured a $4 million settlement with Chase Nissan LLC (doing business as Manchester City Nissan) over allegations the dealership charged consumers unauthorized fees, including double-charging for 'certified pre-owned' vehicles and inserting charges like total loss protection into financing agreements without consent. The settlement requires $4 million in consumer redress, prohibits misrepresentations about vehicle certification and warranties, mandates prominent disclosure of the maximum total vehicle price, and requires express informed consent for all charges.
The FTC filed a complaint against Credit Glory LLC and related entities for deceptive credit repair practices, including false promises, impersonating debt collectors, charging illegal upfront fees, and using negative option billing without consent. A federal court temporarily halted the operation.
The FTC issued a policy statement abandoning disparate-impact liability, stating it will no longer bring claims based on this theory. It also modified compliance obligations for several companies based on past decisions.
The FTC, along with Utah and California, filed a complaint against Hims & Hers alleging the telehealth provider shared consumers' sensitive health information with third-party advertising platforms without consent, and deceived consumers about billing and cancellation practices. The complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act and the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act.