Penalty Amount
$48,597,538
Consumer fraud case where the FTC settled with Growth Cave defendants for operating a deceptive business opportunity and credit repair scheme that cost consumers nearly $50 million. The settlement permanently bans them from such activities, requires asset liquidation to pay a $48.6 million judgment, and prohibits misleading earnings claims and AI use.
The settlement includes permanent bans on marketing business opportunities and credit repair programs, prohibitions on misleading earnings claims and AI use, a $48.6 million judgment partially satisfied through asset liquidation (including a house and luxury vehicles), and funds directed for consumer redress.
In-house legal teams should review all vendor, customer, and partnership agreements where the company sells or markets business opportunities, credit repair services, or any income-generating programs. Specifically scrutinize clauses governing earnings representations, marketing and advertising commitments, use of AI in customer communications or content creation, and dispute resolution/judgment enforcement provisions. Given the permanent ban and $48.6 million judgment, contracts may need amendments to include explicit disclaimers about earnings potential, prohibit the use of AI for deceptive claims, and incorporate compliance mechanisms aligned with the settlement's prohibitions against misleading conduct. Asset liquidation terms in any related settlement or payment plans should also be assessed for enforceability.
Entity
Growth Cave, LLC
Also known as: Growth Cave
Industry
Financial ServicesOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/01/ftc-secures-settlement-banning-growth-cave-defendants-marketing-selling-business-opportunities
GrowthCave FinalOrder
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/GrowthCave-FinalOrder.pdf
Batte FinalOrder
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/Batte-FinalOrder.pdf
StipOrder Marksberry
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/StipOrder-Marksberry.pdf
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"Growth Cave"
"$48,597,538"
"deceptive business opportunity, credit repair scheme"
The FTC filed a complaint alleging that GovAssist LLC, Entry LLC, and Scott Zuckerman used deceptive paid search ads, misleading service and pricing claims, and fake reviews to deceive consumers seeking passport services. The complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act, the Impersonation Rule, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; the case will be decided by the court, and no penalty or remedy is reported as imposed.
The FTC issued its annual report to Congress describing fraud trends affecting older adults and the agency’s enforcement, education, and outreach efforts. The report is not a specific privacy enforcement action and announces no penalty or remedy.
The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.
$106.8M
A federal court entered a $106.8 million default judgment against corporate defendants in an alleged debt-relief scheme that impersonated banks and government entities and targeted seniors and veterans. The judgment permanently bans the defendants from the debt-relief industry and imposes additional prohibitions, including on impersonation, telemarketing, and misrepresentations.
The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.
The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.