Penalty Amount
$12,000,000
The FTC alleged that payment processor Humboldt Merchant Services knowingly processed payments for more than 1,000 shell merchant entities serving as fronts for fraudulent companies engaged in unauthorized billing scams, despite red flags including chargeback rates nearly 10 times higher than card-brand thresholds. Under the proposed stipulated order filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Humboldt will pay $12 million for consumer redress and is permanently banned from processing payments for merchants with a heightened risk of potential fraud.
Humboldt must pay $12 million for consumer redress and is permanently banned from: engaging in or assisting credit card laundering; processing payments for four high-risk merchant categories (straw companies, merchants on the Mastercard MATCH list for excessive chargebacks/laundering/fraud, merchants subject to law enforcement action, and certain e-commerce entities using third-party mailbox providers that use negative option billing or lack processing history); making or assisting false or misleading statements to obtain payment processing; and engaging in tactics to evade fraud and risk monitoring, including load balancing.
In-house teams should review merchant services agreements, payment processing/gateway contracts, acquirer and bank sponsorship agreements, and any affiliate arrangements for payment routing. Key clauses to scrutinize include merchant underwriting and KYC representations, chargeback monitoring thresholds and termination triggers, express prohibitions on credit card laundering and load balancing (including routing transactions through affiliated or lower-risk BINs), restrictions on negative option billing, use-of-proceeds and pass-through account restrictions, representations that the entity is not a shell or straw company, and indemnification for chargebacks and fraud losses. Companies operating as payment facilitators or aggregators should also review onboarding diligence obligations, ongoing monitoring and audit rights over sub-merchants, termination rights tied to MATCH list placement or law enforcement action, and compliance-with-card-network-rules covenants, since the FTC's order effectively makes these risk controls a regulatory expectation for the payments industry.
Entity
Humboldt Merchant Services
Industry
Financial ServicesOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/09/ftc-takes-action-against-payment-processor-humboldt-merchant-services-knowingly-facilitating-payment
Humboldt Complaint
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/Humboldt-Complaint.pdf
Humboldt StipulatedOrder
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/Humboldt-StipulatedOrder.pdf
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"Payment processing company Humboldt Merchant Services will pay $12 million and be permanently banned from processing payments for merchants with a heightened risk of potential fraud to settle allegations that Humboldt processed payments for merchants that defrauded consumers."
"In addition to paying $12 million for consumer redress"
"September 8, 2026"
"Under proposed order, defendant will be required to pay $12 million, stop payment processing for certain categories of merchants"
"shell entities that served as fronts or pass-throughs for fraudulent companies engaged in unauthorized billing scams"
"Humboldt was processing payments for companies despite red flags indicating they were scamming consumers"
The FTC rescinded its 2021 Policy Statement on Breaches by Health Apps and Other Connected Devices, which had purported to apply the Health Breach Notification Rule to health apps and connected devices that collect consumer health information. The rescission follows the Commission's 2024 update to the Health Breach Notification Rule, which already covers health apps and connected devices like fitness trackers, and implements an executive order directing agencies to eliminate obsolete guidance documents. No company was charged or penalized; this is a deregulatory action.
$4.8M
The FTC charged Canada-based payment processor Nuvei Corporation and its subsidiaries with knowingly processing payments for fraudulent merchants, including more than $30 million in payments for the Reimage tech support scam from 2017 to 2023, as well as merchants making false earnings claims and impersonating government tax authorities. Under the stipulated order filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Nuvei will pay $4.85 million for consumer redress, is banned from serving tech support telemarketers, and must implement robust merchant screening and chargeback monitoring practices. Note: this is a payments-fraud facilitation action under the FTC Act and Telemarketing Sales Rule, not a data privacy violation.
The FTC announced a seven-day extension of the public comment period on its proposed enforcement policy statement regarding personalized pricing, pushing the deadline from Sept. 18, 2026 to Sept. 25, 2026. Personalized pricing refers to using personal data to set prices based on what the company believes an individual consumer is willing to spend. This is a procedural announcement about draft agency guidance, not an enforcement action against any company, and no entity was named, no violation found, and no penalty imposed.
Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser joined the FTC and 22 state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit against Amazon for manipulating the auctions used to set advertising prices, replacing actual auction results with higher prices since 2019 and overcharging nearly 1.2 million U.S. advertising customers. The FTC estimates total improper surcharges from 2018 to 2026 exceed $20 billion, with costs ultimately passed to shoppers through higher prices. The states seek a permanent injunction and monetary relief; no penalty has been imposed yet as this is a newly filed complaint.
$930K
The FTC finalized orders requiring CMG Media Corporation (doing business as Cox Media Group), MindSift LLC, and 1010 Digital Works LLC to pay a total of $930,000 for falsely claiming they offered an AI-powered service that could target ads based on conversations captured from consumers' smart devices, and that consumers had opted into such targeting. The orders also prohibit the companies from making misrepresentations about their advertising services, voice data collection, and consumer consent.
The FTC announced it is seeking public comment on a proposed enforcement policy statement regarding personalized pricing, which is the use of personal data to set prices based on what a company believes an individual consumer is willing to spend. The statement warns that undisclosed collection or use of personal data for personalized pricing could violate the FTC Act's prohibition on unfair or deceptive practices. The Commission voted 2-0 to authorize the Federal Register notice.