The FTC finalized an order against IntelliVision Technologies Corp. for making deceptive claims about its facial recognition software's accuracy and lack of bias. The company must now back up any claims with competent testing and is prohibited from misrepresenting the software's performance. No monetary penalty was imposed.
IntelliVision is prohibited from making false or unsubstantiated claims about its facial recognition software's accuracy, bias, and anti-spoofing capabilities. The company must rely on competent and reliable testing before making any representations about the technology.
In-house legal teams should review vendor and customer agreements, particularly those involving AI or biometric software licensing or services, for clauses related to representations, warranties, and performance standards. Focus on terms governing accuracy claims, bias testing, and validation requirements. Agreements may need amendments to mandate competent testing to substantiate any claims about software accuracy or lack of bias, explicitly prohibit misrepresentations, and incorporate specific validation protocols. Additionally, ensure compliance clauses align with FTC standards to avoid deceptive practices, and consider adding audit rights for verifying claims.
Entity
IntelliVision Technologies Corp.
Also known as: IntelliVision Technologies
Industry
TechnologyOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/cases-proceedings/232-3023-intellivision-matter
2323023c4809intellivisionfinalconsent
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/2323023c4809intellivisionfinalconsent.pdf
2323023c4809intellivisionfinalorder
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/2323023c4809intellivisionfinalorder.pdf
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"IntelliVision Technologies Corp."
"lacked evidence to back up its claims that its software had one of the highest accuracy rates on the market and performs with zero gender or racial bias."
The FTC filed a complaint alleging that GovAssist LLC, Entry LLC, and Scott Zuckerman used deceptive paid search ads, misleading service and pricing claims, and fake reviews to deceive consumers seeking passport services. The complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act, the Impersonation Rule, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; the case will be decided by the court, and no penalty or remedy is reported as imposed.
The FTC issued its annual report to Congress describing fraud trends affecting older adults and the agency’s enforcement, education, and outreach efforts. The report is not a specific privacy enforcement action and announces no penalty or remedy.
The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.
$106.8M
A federal court entered a $106.8 million default judgment against corporate defendants in an alleged debt-relief scheme that impersonated banks and government entities and targeted seniors and veterans. The judgment permanently bans the defendants from the debt-relief industry and imposes additional prohibitions, including on impersonation, telemarketing, and misrepresentations.
The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.
The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.