Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Consent DecreeLow Risk

FTC Bars IntelliVision from Deceptive Facial Recognition Claims

IntelliVision Technologies Corp.January 13, 2025Federal Trade Commission

Summary

The FTC finalized an order against IntelliVision Technologies Corp. for making deceptive claims about its facial recognition software's accuracy and lack of bias. The company must now back up any claims with competent testing and is prohibited from misrepresenting the software's performance. No monetary penalty was imposed.

Remedy

IntelliVision is prohibited from making false or unsubstantiated claims about its facial recognition software's accuracy, bias, and anti-spoofing capabilities. The company must rely on competent and reliable testing before making any representations about the technology.

InjunctionConsent Decree

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review vendor and customer agreements, particularly those involving AI or biometric software licensing or services, for clauses related to representations, warranties, and performance standards. Focus on terms governing accuracy claims, bias testing, and validation requirements. Agreements may need amendments to mandate competent testing to substantiate any claims about software accuracy or lack of bias, explicitly prohibit misrepresentations, and incorporate specific validation protocols. Additionally, ensure compliance clauses align with FTC standards to avoid deceptive practices, and consider adding audit rights for verifying claims.

Contract Search Terms

accuracy representationsbias testing requirementsperformance standardsmisrepresentation prohibitiontesting and validation protocolswarranty of software capabilitiesAI validation clausecompliance with accuracy claimsnon-discrimination in AIrepresentation and warranty

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

IntelliVision Technologies Corp.

Also known as: IntelliVision Technologies

Industry

Technology

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"IntelliVision Technologies Corp."
Violation Types
"lacked evidence to back up its claims that its software had one of the highest accuracy rates on the market and performs with zero gender or racial bias."

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

Vanilla Chip LLC

$750K

The FTC finalized an order against Vanilla Chip LLC (doing business as TruHeight) and its principals for deceptively advertising height-enhancing supplements for children and teens without scientific evidence. The company also used fake reviews and incentivized 5-star ratings. The order requires a $750,000 payment and prohibits false health claims and deceptive review practices.

FTC

RentGrow Inc.

$2.3M

The FTC alleged that RentGrow, a tenant screening company, violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by failing to use reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy of its reports, including by reporting duplicate records and failing to disclose data sources. RentGrow agreed to pay a $2.25 million penalty and is prohibited from further FCRA violations and from misrepresenting dispute outcomes.

FTC

Handy Technologies

The FTC and New York Attorney General took action against Handy Technologies for deceptive earnings claims and failure to disclose fees and fines that led to millions of dollars being withheld from workers' wages. The FTC is sending over $2.7 million in refunds to 62,893 affected consumers.

FTC

Hopper Inc.

$35.0M

The FTC alleged that Hopper, a travel booking app, charged consumers hidden and pre-selected fees (Tip and VIP Support) without their consent, misrepresented the benefits of VIP Support and Price Freeze services, and failed to clearly disclose total prices. Hopper agreed to pay $35 million for consumer redress and is prohibited from misrepresenting fees under a proposed order.

FTC

Publishing.com LLC

$1.5M

The FTC finalized a settlement with Publishing.com LLC and its principals for misleading consumers about potential earnings from self-publishing products. The company will pay $1.5 million and is prohibited from making unsubstantiated earnings claims, failing to disclose refund terms, and misrepresenting endorsements and reviews.

FTC

Federal Trade Commission

The FTC is seeking public comment on a proposed policy statement addressing concerns that AI companies may be manipulating AI system outputs contrary to consumer expectations for objectivity and accuracy. The statement explains that such conduct could be considered deceptive under Section 5 of the FTC Act. The public comment period runs until July 31, 2026.