Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Consent DecreeCritical Risk

FTC Settles with Midwest Recovery for $24.3M Over Debt Parking Scheme

Midwest Recovery SystemsNovember 30, 2020Federal Trade Commission

Penalty Amount

$24,300,000

Summary

The FTC settled with Midwest Recovery Systems for engaging in 'debt parking,' where it placed inaccurate debts on consumers' credit reports to force payment. The company collected over $24 million from such debts. The settlement requires it to delete all reported debts, stop the practice, and pay a $24.3 million monetary judgment.

Remedy

Midwest Recovery must cease debt parking, delete all debts it reported to credit bureaus, and pay a monetary judgment of $24.3 million, with $56,748 due immediately and the rest suspended.

Monetary PenaltyInjunctionConsent DecreeData Deletion

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review all vendor and third-party service agreements, particularly those with debt collection agencies, data furnishers, and credit reporting service providers. Specific clauses to scrutinize include data accuracy warranties, credit reporting and furnishing obligations, dispute resolution mechanisms, indemnification provisions for Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) violations, and audit rights. Agreements may require amendments to mandate pre-reporting debt validation, immediate deletion of disputed or inaccurate information, regular compliance certifications, and robust record-keeping requirements to prevent 'debt parking' or similar practices.

Contract Search Terms

debt validation requirementscredit report dispute processfurnisher accuracy obligationsFCRA compliance certificationdata furnishing agreementconsumer notification proceduresaudit rights for data accuracy

Laws Cited

FTC ActFair Debt Collection Practices ActFair Credit Reporting ActFCRA Furnisher Rule

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Midwest Recovery Systems

Also known as: Midwest Recovery

Industry

Financial Services

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Midwest Recovery Systems"
Fine Amount
"monetary judgment of $24.3 million"
Laws Cited
"FTC Act"
Laws Cited
"Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA)"
Laws Cited
"Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA)"
Laws Cited
"FCRA’s Furnisher Rule"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

GovAssist LLC, Entry LLC, and Scott Zuckerman

The FTC filed a complaint alleging that GovAssist LLC, Entry LLC, and Scott Zuckerman used deceptive paid search ads, misleading service and pricing claims, and fake reviews to deceive consumers seeking passport services. The complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act, the Impersonation Rule, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; the case will be decided by the court, and no penalty or remedy is reported as imposed.

FTC

Federal Trade Commission

The FTC issued its annual report to Congress describing fraud trends affecting older adults and the agency’s enforcement, education, and outreach efforts. The report is not a specific privacy enforcement action and announces no penalty or remedy.

FTC

REPS & Company Inc.

The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.

FTC

Accelerated Debt Settlement Inc.; ADS Resolve LLC; Financial Solutions Group LLC; Unified Capital Services LLC; Mediwerks; Resolution Specialists LLC; and Futura Capital

$106.8M

A federal court entered a $106.8 million default judgment against corporate defendants in an alleged debt-relief scheme that impersonated banks and government entities and targeted seniors and veterans. The judgment permanently bans the defendants from the debt-relief industry and imposes additional prohibitions, including on impersonation, telemarketing, and misrepresentations.

FTC

Digital Forensics Corporation LLC

The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.

FTC

Greenway Auto Group

The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.