Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Consent DecreeCritical Risk

FTC Settles with Midwest Recovery for $24.3M Over Debt Parking Scheme

Midwest Recovery SystemsNovember 30, 2020Federal Trade Commission

Penalty Amount

$24,300,000

Summary

The FTC settled with Midwest Recovery Systems for engaging in 'debt parking,' where it placed inaccurate debts on consumers' credit reports to force payment. The company collected over $24 million from such debts. The settlement requires it to delete all reported debts, stop the practice, and pay a $24.3 million monetary judgment.

Remedy

Midwest Recovery must cease debt parking, delete all debts it reported to credit bureaus, and pay a monetary judgment of $24.3 million, with $56,748 due immediately and the rest suspended.

Monetary PenaltyInjunctionConsent DecreeData Deletion

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review all vendor and third-party service agreements, particularly those with debt collection agencies, data furnishers, and credit reporting service providers. Specific clauses to scrutinize include data accuracy warranties, credit reporting and furnishing obligations, dispute resolution mechanisms, indemnification provisions for Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) violations, and audit rights. Agreements may require amendments to mandate pre-reporting debt validation, immediate deletion of disputed or inaccurate information, regular compliance certifications, and robust record-keeping requirements to prevent 'debt parking' or similar practices.

Contract Search Terms

debt validation requirementscredit report dispute processfurnisher accuracy obligationsFCRA compliance certificationdata furnishing agreementconsumer notification proceduresaudit rights for data accuracy

Laws Cited

FTC ActFair Debt Collection Practices ActFair Credit Reporting ActFCRA Furnisher Rule

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Midwest Recovery Systems

Also known as: Midwest Recovery

Industry

Financial Services

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Midwest Recovery Systems"
Fine Amount
"monetary judgment of $24.3 million"
Laws Cited
"FTC Act"
Laws Cited
"Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA)"
Laws Cited
"Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA)"
Laws Cited
"FCRA’s Furnisher Rule"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

Vanilla Chip LLC

$750K

The FTC finalized an order against Vanilla Chip LLC (doing business as TruHeight) and its principals for deceptively advertising height-enhancing supplements for children and teens without scientific evidence. The company also used fake reviews and incentivized 5-star ratings. The order requires a $750,000 payment and prohibits false health claims and deceptive review practices.

FTC

RentGrow Inc.

$2.3M

The FTC alleged that RentGrow, a tenant screening company, violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by failing to use reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy of its reports, including by reporting duplicate records and failing to disclose data sources. RentGrow agreed to pay a $2.25 million penalty and is prohibited from further FCRA violations and from misrepresenting dispute outcomes.

FTC

Handy Technologies

The FTC and New York Attorney General took action against Handy Technologies for deceptive earnings claims and failure to disclose fees and fines that led to millions of dollars being withheld from workers' wages. The FTC is sending over $2.7 million in refunds to 62,893 affected consumers.

FTC

Hopper Inc.

$35.0M

The FTC alleged that Hopper, a travel booking app, charged consumers hidden and pre-selected fees (Tip and VIP Support) without their consent, misrepresented the benefits of VIP Support and Price Freeze services, and failed to clearly disclose total prices. Hopper agreed to pay $35 million for consumer redress and is prohibited from misrepresenting fees under a proposed order.

FTC

Publishing.com LLC

$1.5M

The FTC finalized a settlement with Publishing.com LLC and its principals for misleading consumers about potential earnings from self-publishing products. The company will pay $1.5 million and is prohibited from making unsubstantiated earnings claims, failing to disclose refund terms, and misrepresenting endorsements and reviews.

FTC

Federal Trade Commission

The FTC is seeking public comment on a proposed policy statement addressing concerns that AI companies may be manipulating AI system outputs contrary to consumer expectations for objectivity and accuracy. The statement explains that such conduct could be considered deceptive under Section 5 of the FTC Act. The public comment period runs until July 31, 2026.