Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Consent DecreeHigh Risk

FTC Bans Monument from Health Data Advertising, Imposes $2.5M Fine

Monument, Inc.April 11, 2024Federal Trade Commission

Penalty Amount

$2,500,000

Consumers Affected

84,000

Summary

Monument, Inc., an alcohol addiction treatment firm, shared consumers' health data with third-party advertising platforms like Meta and Google without consent, despite promising confidentiality. The FTC settled with a consent order that bans Monument from disclosing health data for advertising, requires affirmative consent for other sharing, imposes a $2.5 million suspended fine, and mandates data deletion, consumer notification, and a privacy program.

Remedy

Monument is banned from disclosing health information for advertising and must obtain affirmative consent before sharing health information for any other purpose. The company must pay a $2.5 million civil penalty (suspended), delete user data shared with third parties, notify affected consumers, and implement a comprehensive privacy program with data retention limits.

BanMonetary PenaltyData DeletionCorrective NoticeCompliance ProgramConsent Decree

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review all agreements involving consumer health data, particularly vendor contracts with advertising platforms (e.g., Meta, Google), customer Terms of Service/Privacy Policies, and Data Processing Agreements (DPAs). Specific clauses to scrutinize include: (1) data sharing and licensing provisions to ensure they explicitly prohibit using sensitive health information for advertising/targeting; (2) consent mechanisms to verify they require clear, affirmative, and separate consent for any health data sharing beyond core service delivery; (3) confidentiality and data security clauses to align with promised protections; and (4) audit and compliance reporting requirements. Changes needed will likely involve adding explicit bans on using health data for ads, implementing granular consent flows, strengthening data deletion protocols, and mandating regular privacy program assessments and reporting.

Contract Search Terms

health data sharing clauseaffirmative consent requirementadvertising disclosure prohibitionthird-party data sharingsensitive health informationconfidentiality promisedata processing addendumprivacy program implementationconsumer notification obligationdata deletion mandate

Laws Cited

FTC ActOpioid Addiction Recovery Fraud Prevention Act of 2018

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Monument, Inc.

Also known as: Monument

Industry

Healthcare

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"New York-based Monument, Inc."
Fine Amount
"imposes a $2.5 million civil penalty"
Laws Cited
"FTC Act’s prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices"
Laws Cited
"Opioid Addiction Recovery Fraud Prevention Act of 2018 (OARFPA)"
Violation Types
"FTC says Monument shared consumers’ health data with third-party advertising platforms without consent"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

Vanilla Chip LLC

$750K

The FTC finalized an order against Vanilla Chip LLC (doing business as TruHeight) and its principals for deceptively advertising height-enhancing supplements for children and teens without scientific evidence. The company also used fake reviews and incentivized 5-star ratings. The order requires a $750,000 payment and prohibits false health claims and deceptive review practices.

FTC

RentGrow Inc.

$2.3M

The FTC alleged that RentGrow, a tenant screening company, violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by failing to use reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy of its reports, including by reporting duplicate records and failing to disclose data sources. RentGrow agreed to pay a $2.25 million penalty and is prohibited from further FCRA violations and from misrepresenting dispute outcomes.

FTC

Handy Technologies

The FTC and New York Attorney General took action against Handy Technologies for deceptive earnings claims and failure to disclose fees and fines that led to millions of dollars being withheld from workers' wages. The FTC is sending over $2.7 million in refunds to 62,893 affected consumers.

FTC

Hopper Inc.

$35.0M

The FTC alleged that Hopper, a travel booking app, charged consumers hidden and pre-selected fees (Tip and VIP Support) without their consent, misrepresented the benefits of VIP Support and Price Freeze services, and failed to clearly disclose total prices. Hopper agreed to pay $35 million for consumer redress and is prohibited from misrepresenting fees under a proposed order.

FTC

Publishing.com LLC

$1.5M

The FTC finalized a settlement with Publishing.com LLC and its principals for misleading consumers about potential earnings from self-publishing products. The company will pay $1.5 million and is prohibited from making unsubstantiated earnings claims, failing to disclose refund terms, and misrepresenting endorsements and reviews.

FTC

Federal Trade Commission

The FTC is seeking public comment on a proposed policy statement addressing concerns that AI companies may be manipulating AI system outputs contrary to consumer expectations for objectivity and accuracy. The statement explains that such conduct could be considered deceptive under Section 5 of the FTC Act. The public comment period runs until July 31, 2026.