Penalty Amount
$15,000,000
The FTC and CFPB settled with Trans Union LLC and its subsidiary for violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act by including inaccurate and incomplete eviction records in tenant screening reports, harming consumers' ability to obtain housing. The settlement requires Trans Union to pay $15 million, with $11 million for consumer compensation and $4 million as a civil penalty, and to implement measures to ensure report accuracy and disclose data sources.
Trans Union must pay $15 million ($11 million to compensate affected consumers and $4 million civil penalty), implement procedures to ensure accuracy of tenant screening reports, prevent inclusion of problematic records, disclose sources of information, provide consumers with their file upon request, and make an adverse action notice letter available on their website.
In-house legal teams should review vendor agreements with data providers (e.g., court record vendors) to ensure they include robust data accuracy warranties, audit rights, and requirements for the vendor to correct inaccuracies. Customer agreements with landlords, property managers, and screening service clients must be examined for clauses guaranteeing FCRA-compliant report generation, mandatory disclosure of all data sources used, and clear procedures for handling consumer disputes and reinvestigations. Data processing addendums (DPAs) should be updated to mandate specific accuracy metrics, regular data source validation, and protocols for promptly removing incomplete or outdated eviction records. Necessary changes include adding express certifications of FCRA compliance, requiring TransUnion to provide clients with summaries of data sourcing methodologies, and strengthening indemnification provisions to cover liabilities from inaccurate reporting.
Entity
Trans Union LLC
Also known as: TransUnion
Industry
Data BrokerOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/10/ftc-cfpb-settlement-require-trans-union-pay-15-million-over-charges-it-failed-ensure-accuracy-tenant
tu turss complaint final
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/tu_turss_complaint_final.pdf
tu turss order final
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/tu_turss_order_final.pdf
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"Trans Union LLC"
"pay a total of $15 million"
"violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA)"
"failed to ensure the accuracy of the information included in their tenant background screening reports"
$750K
The FTC finalized an order against Vanilla Chip LLC (doing business as TruHeight) and its principals for deceptively advertising height-enhancing supplements for children and teens without scientific evidence. The company also used fake reviews and incentivized 5-star ratings. The order requires a $750,000 payment and prohibits false health claims and deceptive review practices.
$2.3M
The FTC alleged that RentGrow, a tenant screening company, violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by failing to use reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy of its reports, including by reporting duplicate records and failing to disclose data sources. RentGrow agreed to pay a $2.25 million penalty and is prohibited from further FCRA violations and from misrepresenting dispute outcomes.
The FTC and New York Attorney General took action against Handy Technologies for deceptive earnings claims and failure to disclose fees and fines that led to millions of dollars being withheld from workers' wages. The FTC is sending over $2.7 million in refunds to 62,893 affected consumers.
$35.0M
The FTC alleged that Hopper, a travel booking app, charged consumers hidden and pre-selected fees (Tip and VIP Support) without their consent, misrepresented the benefits of VIP Support and Price Freeze services, and failed to clearly disclose total prices. Hopper agreed to pay $35 million for consumer redress and is prohibited from misrepresenting fees under a proposed order.
$1.5M
The FTC finalized a settlement with Publishing.com LLC and its principals for misleading consumers about potential earnings from self-publishing products. The company will pay $1.5 million and is prohibited from making unsubstantiated earnings claims, failing to disclose refund terms, and misrepresenting endorsements and reviews.
The FTC is seeking public comment on a proposed policy statement addressing concerns that AI companies may be manipulating AI system outputs contrary to consumer expectations for objectivity and accuracy. The statement explains that such conduct could be considered deceptive under Section 5 of the FTC Act. The public comment period runs until July 31, 2026.